Comments (12)
Share this article
Print this page
The writer is founder of Pakistan-based Khudi, a platform to counter extremism
Rehman Baba’s shrine. Jamia-e-Naeemi. Data Sahib’s shrine. Scores of Muslims killed in places of worship meant to be a sanctuary for believers. And so it seems that dark forces using the name of Islam have started attacking the very people they claim to be fighting for. While it is not my purpose to speculate on which group carried out what attack, it certainly is my purpose to state that there are some among us who are seeking to force their version of Islam upon all others, even going so far as attacking places of worship and religious symbols in pursuit of this aim. I know this because I have spent years living and debating with many of them as a political prisoner in Egypt. I was imprisoned for being a member of Hizb ut Tahrir (HT), an extremist organisation seeking to establish an expansionist ‘Khilafat’ via military coups in Muslim-majority states.
So why would anyone seek to attack a place of worship? Surely this only serves to alienate them from the very society they claim to be fighting for. Occupation and oppression alone cannot be cited as reasons behind such terrorism. True, occupation breeds anger and frustration, but mosques never occupied anyone. Grievances plague us all, but many of us respond with legal and non-sectarian initiatives. Why then must some of us exploit those grievances to force one brand of Islam onto everyone else? What does the occupation of Afghanistan have to do with forcing men to grow beards, women to cover their faces, and the destruction of shrines?
Grievances will always exist — instead, the answer lies in the extremists’ perception of these grievances. While most of us understand the world and its wars through a geo-political lens, extremists insist there is some grand and global war against Islam and Muslims. In response, this obliges a global ‘jihad’ by Muslims against ‘infidels’ in ‘defence’ of Islam. Muslim versus ‘kafir’: choose your side! And just like that, the extremist narrative is born.
The trouble is, polarising the world in such a way requires defining exactly who is a Muslim, and who is a ‘kafir’. And so the first seeds of puritanism and sectarianism are sown. The resulting tensions sustain the flames of extremist recruitment; and the thirst to feed this narrative by seeking out the enemy leads to bloodshed. Defining the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’ believer results in society declaring war on itself. Lest we forget, the Kharijites killed Imam Ali in pursuit of the very same slogan we hear being preached today; ‘The rule is for none but God’.
Extremists do not just insist on fighting the ‘kafir’ — by defining the ‘legitimate Muslim’, then forcing their definition upon everyone — they seek to draw battle lines to suit their interpretation of the grievances. In this way, dress codes and beards become symbols of the persecuted ‘true Islam’.
Weakness in these represents weakness in Islam, which means losing the war. Thus, those not deemed to be true Muslims are automatically aligned with the ‘kafir’, and attacking them symbolises a blow to the enemy.
As a person who has been down the path of extremism and back, I take every opportunity to stress that challenging extremism involves more than just addressing grievances and arresting terrorists. The government needs to start facilitating plans for a national counter-narrative, one that clearly differentiates the Islamic faith from the ideology of the extremists which necessitates the forced imposition of one interpretation of Islam over society either through violence or through law. Without such a counter-narrative, there will be little hope in stopping Pakistani Muslims killing fellow Pakistani Muslims (amongst others) in their quest to ‘defend Islam’.
The National Counter Terrorism Authority (Nacta) has been established to do just this. Let’s hope that Nacta is soon able to adopt a strategy that seeks to tackle the causes of extremism – grievances, identity, recruiters and ideology – together in a coordinated and informed way.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 6th, 2010.
More in Opinion
The gains from GST
Grievances ..? or more like frustration ?
You might call extremism a branch of religion but one has to understand first the reason it exist. While it is true all faith might have some sort of extremist ideologies , islam for one is very much Political. To make a very bold statement , “Muslims and Democracy will always fail”. The mere concept of Democracy is the battleground of Al-Quaida. Since you mentioned Egypt , you must then be well acquainted with the ideology of the Al-Quaida of the Arab peninsula which happens to be a partial ideology of hisbut tahrir. Both call to revert towards Khilafaah , democracy is kufr.
This very principle is new and not related to the times of Kharjites as popularly labelled in the Middle east to any one who declares their Kingdoms or Governments as illegal. The times this ideology is closer to is that of Ibn Taymiyyah (May ALLAH be pleased with him). The only period before this one where Caliphate was destroyed , back then by the invading Mongols.
A country like Pakistan is not enough to address extremism unless a global Islamic entity comes into being. To relate it to kharjites or by waging war against this kind of belief is pointless. It is simple, good governance is possible only through the ways of Quran, Sunnah and the ways of the Companions. Anyone who negates this view is labelled as a kafir, not only by ‘extremists’ but by the texts of contemporary scholars. The task at hand is not as simple as it sounds. Extremism is here to stay , it is very much embedded in the Islam that reached our generation.Recommend
Well said. However unfortunately the main stream media, especially Urdu one, is a playing a very negative role and has become a tool in the hands of terrorists, with some journalist even involved with terrorists. And not to forget the entire Pakistani education system is based on spreading hatred for “others”. I can’t believe now what we were taught in Social Studies and Islamiat in the name of Islam and Pakistan. Most of that stuff is purely anti-Islam and as a result breeding terrorists at a fast rate.Recommend
It wasnt khilafat, it was monarchy, please study some historyRecommend
So what is your point man?….All this has been said much more eloquently many times before…:)Recommend
Mullahs and terrorists are becomes social evil and they are murdering innocent persons in the worship places in the name of Islam.Media plays a duel role.Some tv anchors project and protect them.Recommend
There is poverty in India and Africa, but people of these 2 places dont go and blow themselves up, not only killing themselves, but innocent Civilians.
The problem lies with the ideology of the state and its system. The first step is the negation of 2 nation theory and establishment of a secular constitution and govt.Recommend
There’s a difference between a mosque & a shrine. These people follow Salafi fiqh, according to which shrines are not kosher. They consider such places as dens of paganism because of some acts/rituals that some people perform there, which even the dominant Hanafi, Hunbli & the Shia fiqhs frown upon.Recommend
Bravo!!! Well Said. It needs to said loud and clear, and repeated, and repeated again and again.
@Hyder – Good stuff needs to be repeated again and again. If you don’t have a good point, no need to score points, man!Recommend
@Hyder
I think the point here is that we, as a society, need to stop blaming ‘foreign policy’ for all our ills. Of course the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq has been disastrous, but how can we say that people are killing women and children in marketplaces and targetting Shias and other minorities because of what’s happening in Iraq and Afghanistan? Obviously something more is afoot, and that ‘something more’ is the self-given right that certain groups have awarded themselves to impose their interpretation of Islam on the rest of us. That’s why men were being punished for not growing beards and women were being flogged for ‘impropriety’ in Swat. And somehow those who disagree with them are automatically counted as friends of/agents for ‘the West’!!
Let’s wake up people, and make it absolutely clear that there’s NO ROOM for extremism and intolerance within our society. We want a country free from the horrors of the Taliban and free from the dictates of the US, but the only way we’ll manage that is if we take a good, hard look at ourselves…
P.s. great article by the author, by the way. We definitely need more of this!Recommend
Now-a-days the question in Pakistan is who is a true Muslim?
Every one think that he or she is a perfect Muslim and do not hesitate to say to the other person that “He or she is a Kafir”?
What kind of Islam Muslims are following? The biggest threat to Islam is the illiterate or semi-literate Mullahs who give speeches without knowing the fact that what will be its consequences.
A person who is not a graduate in Islam should not be allowed to address the religious gathering.Recommend
Excellent! We need to say this more LOUDLY! We have to stop killing period. I believe in all people as equal regardless of religion, race, ethnicity especially worship. Do not bear witness to injustices, and i will not!Recommend
Jews r doing this and their stoogesRecommend