Reviewing our counter-terrorism policy


Asad Munir July 12, 2010

The 17-member parliamentary committee on national security recently urged the government to change its strategy for combating terrorism. The chairman of the committee, Senator Raza Rabbani, made the statement after the director general of military operations briefed the committee on the progress of operations in Fata and Malakand. On July 8 the DG ISI said that foreign elements are involved in increasing terrorism incidents in the country, that Pakistan would review its policy as per its national interest and that its security forces were committed to crush the terrorists in the country.

On August 14 2001, a month before 9/11, sectarian organisations were banned. Post 9/11, Pakistan banned jihadi outfits that were once used for insurgency in Kashmir. Pakistan was a sincere ally as far as al Qaeda was concerned. The army moved to the inaccessible areas of Tirah and Kurram Agency to seal the east side of Tora Bora in coordination with US Special Forces. More than 200 hardcore al Qaeda militants fleeing Tora Bora were apprehended in Kurram. Conspiracy theorists, including a non-Pashtun journalist considered an authority on Taliban, are wrong when they say that the borders of South and North Waziristan were intentionally left unmanned to facilitate the entry of Afghan Taliban and al Qaeda into Pakistan. No operations were being conducted at that time in the Khost, Paktia and Paktika provinces of Afghanistan bordering Waziristan. Army units moved to North Waziristan by the end of 2001 and to South Waziristan in the spring of 2002. In Peshawar alone about 27 raids were conducted in 2002-2003. The Haqqani madrassa in Miranshah was raided thrice. The reported hideouts of Mullah Kabir and Osmani were raided as well.

The DG ISI has implied that army operations are likely to continue until the terrorists lay down their arms and guarantee that they will not interfere in state affairs. The government should provide proof to the world community about the involvement of foreign hands in terrorist activities the way India has convinced the world about Lashkar-e-Taiba’s involvement in the Mumbai attacks.

The Afghans and the US want to negotiate with the insurgents. We have done it many times, starting from 2004; each year peace agreements are signed with the Taliban operating in different area but the Taliban always violate them. If they are willing to lay down their arms the government may consider announcing general amnesty to the foot soldiers. Pakistan would like a peaceful and stable Afghanistan, one not under Indian influence. Pakistan would never want the system of government that was run by the Taliban until 2001, because we know through experience that it directly affects the internal security of Fata and Khyber-Pakhtunkwa. Pakistan should be made part of any negotiations held with the Afghan Taliban by the US and Afghan President Hamid Karzai. Afghanistan and the US should understand this ground reality.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 13th, 2010.

COMMENTS (24)

Farukh Sarwar | 13 years ago | Reply Counter terrorism must involve an all inclusive approach that involves the use of all tactics to fight insurgency.
Khan | 13 years ago | Reply FATA and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is a very perplexing area. After the british left Hindustan and the Muslims acquired their own free land, it was the tribal laskhars who went to fight for Pakistan in Kashmir. As for the rest of khyber pakhtunkhwa, go to any remote village and you'll find the people are hardcore pakistanis who love the pakistan army and the national flag (perhaps they don't have access to enough subversive media). Its safe to say that if today there is a war with India there would be massive number of volunteers moving to the borders to fight from these pashtun areas. On the other hand there are ties between the tribals of FATA and bordering Afghanistan and if you ask any Pashtun from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, he'll tell you that deep inside he has love for Afghanistan. For example the Yousafzais would call themselves Afghans till recent times (their roots being from Kandahar). The meaning of the word of Afghan has changed. Previously when you said Afghan it was synonymous to the word pashtun. Now since the pashtuns have ruled for so long in afghanistan, the country is called afghanistan and any uzbeks, tajiks or hazara are also afghan nationals. The point I'm trying to make is that the Pahstuns of Pakistan are loyal citizens, but to think that Pakistan shouldn't be part of any NATO/US negotiations with the Taliban (pahstuns), is silly. Its not interference, its common sense for Pakistan to be a part of it. The Pakistan Army has done more in the fight against terrorism than NATO or US. They pressurise Pakistan to do more when they are thinking of peace talks. I understand some pushtun dislike towards the punjabis. It's not just punjabis, this feeling has existed through out history for sikhs or Mughals, for understandable reasons. But to say that the punjabis created the Al-Qaeeda or the Taliban? Conspiracy theory! Next thing we'll hear is there was no 911 or that it was staged by the free masons or something. Pakistan army has a large number of Pushtuns who are fighting the Taliban. And in their free time they dance the attanr and sing pushto songs. It's not a war against pushtuns, though the pushtuns must suffer because we have been proud of hundreds of years of history full of war and ironically the saga must continue.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ