US, Pakistan 'need each other': Gates

US Defense Secretary says it is critical for the US to maintain ties with Pakistan.


Express June 30, 2011

WASHINGTON: Outgoing US Defense Secretary Robert M Gates said on Thursday that it was critical for the United States to maintain ties with Pakistan despite growing anti-Americanism in the Pakistani military and the worst relationship between the two countries in years.

Gates was speaking during a news conference along with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of StafF Admiral Mike Mullen.

“The long history of the US-Pakistani relationship has had its ebbs and flows,” said Gates. “We need each other, and we need each other more than just in the context of Afghanistan.”

Gates declined to say that the was “winning” the war, despite US claims of recent military gains. “I have learned a few things in four and a half years, and one of them is to try to stay away from loaded words like ‘winning’ and ‘losing,’ ” he said. "Our military operations are being successful in denying the Taliban control of populated areas, degrading their capabilities and improving the capabilities of the Afghan national security forces.”

Both Gates and Mullen deflected a question on whether they were concerned that General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani might be in danger of losing his position.

Pakistan-US ties reached their lowest point in recent history after American Seals conducted a unilateral raid in Abbottabad to kill al Qaeda's chief Osama Bin Laden.

COMMENTS (14)

Mark | 12 years ago | Reply @David: What? Starving... We have places that feed the homeless for free. The only way an American is going to die from starvation at the moment is intentional suicide or an eating disorder. There are unemployment concerns in the US. Though many unemployed get assistance in terms of food. Most complaints in regard to that are just "barely" making ends meet or a concern in regard to if it drags on for too much longer. We have flaws, but at least use the real things rather than what sounds good. This is coming from someone who isn't anywhere in the "privileged" rankings of society or whatever you would like to call it. You also forget the government wouldn't be "invaders" if every last citizen rejected it. Speak for yourself. I'd happily go hungry if it meant shutting the mouths of people like you and forcefully reminding your little militant factions of their rightful place in the world. That place being on the run with only fear and regret to keep them company.
Vinayak | 12 years ago | Reply Master needs a slave to whip.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ