Drug money continues to fund Taliban operations: Maria Sultan

US contributing to Taliban cause by failing to stifle money streams funding terrorists.


April 27, 2011

Defence analyst Maria Sultan claimed on last night’s Express 24/7 show Witness with Quatrina Hosain that the US was contributing to the Taliban in part by allowing the poppy trade to flourish.

Quatrina Hosain hosted former ambassador Asif Ezdi, Editor of Blue Chip magazine Humayun Gohar and Director of South Asian Strategic Stability Institute Maria Sultan in the program to talk about the Pakistan-America relationship and the recent Wikileaks cables.

The cables released over the weekend reveal that the US had the ISI listed as a terrorist organisation.

Sultan questioned the US approach towards controlling the booming poppy cultivation in Afghanistan which was undoubtedly one source for the Taliban to fund its continued operations on both sides of the Durand line.  Furthermore there was a ready supply of weapons and other supplies available from raiding NATO supply lines.

Another source of funding, Sultan revealed, was how payment to Afghan contractors was landing into Taliban hands. Local contractors hired by Afghan government and security forces were in fact local warlords who also paid their dues to the Taliban, hence the U.S. money was ultimately part-funding the enemy, she said.

Ezdi believed that stopping the money trail would include freezing foreign donations. He said that guerrilla organisations like Talibans did not require massive funding to conduct its operations. However its network ensured that there was a steady stream of money coming in from other countries.

Gohar quoted a book “Mr. Nice” which talked about how the Americans were involved in establishing a trade conduit for Afghan drugs from the fields in Kandahar, all the way to buyers in Europe via Continental lines. The US had already half financed the war during the Soviet invasion in this manner, he said, implying a similar strategy was at work currently.

Sultan further commented on the strained ties between Pakistan and America in light of the recent Wikileaks expose that this may in fact be a ploy where by US can leave the region, leaving behind its private contractors to continue the fight. The only way ISI could be made to accept this change in nature  of the war, was to demonise the ISI, and recent visit of Gen. David Petraeus was to flame anti-ISI sentiments.

The guests, who rejected the Wikileaks cables as "staged" believed that the ISI was being singled out by US as a primary scapegoat to its lack of success in the war.

COMMENTS (4)

John | 12 years ago | Reply @Usman: "Who is supporting terrorism?" The corrupt, Kandahar based Afghanis who are in bed with corrupt Kabul officials through the corrupt Pakistan border security force are supporting the terrorism, if that is not clear from the report. When asked by the reporter, the ISAF commander said “We are completely aware that there are a number of illicit activities being run out of that border station.”......“He(drug lord, tribal leader, security man of the province) runs effective security ops that are designed to make sure that the business end of his life runs smoothly, and there is a collateral effect on public order,”...“Ideally, it should be the other way around. The tragedy of Kandahar is that it’s hard to find that paragon of civic virtue." The shipping containers of acetic anhydride from China used in heroin manufacturing passes through Karachi to Afghanistan, and PAK customs clears it. Is Afghanistan producing pharmaceuticals to use this in such an industrial scale? China ships it via Dubai and knows where it is going, and the finished product also leaves via Karachi ( one of the main routes). The region has been producing opium long before Taliban, and the chaos of war only makes the drug lord to grease his way from Kandahar to Karachi. Let us not loose side of the fact, where the unrest is in Afghanistan. Kandahar! And Pakistan is the immediate victim of heroin export from Afghanistan . And to be very clear, it is not US/NATO running the drug trade or cultivating poppy, clearing chemicals for drug production, and forging shipping invoices of smuggled goods, as per the 2009 Harper magazine article quoted by you.
John | 12 years ago | Reply Eliminating poppy fields initially came with lot of IEDs and Karzai gov was not in favor during initial phase of war. Now we all know such remote control IED training came with blessings of "rogue" ISI fellows. NATO efforts were not focused on substitute farming, until recently which is now handled quiet well by others, in case if some one cares. The opinion is one sided and frankly no one believes that to be true. It is like the same tale that PAK army funded its Nuclear weapons program party through drug tales. "Local contractors hired by Afghan government and security forces were in fact local warlords who also paid their dues to the Taliban, hence the U.S. money was ultimately part-funding the enemy, she said."- Logic? If I hire a contractor and pays him for his work, and if he gives part of his earning to his neighborhood bully as protection money, am I the one to blame for the bully mafia in the contractors neighborhood- her logic is based on this theory. Only in PAK television such views are entertained without questioning the authenticity or veracity of the claims. Anything anti-US sells in PAK , so it is not surprising that she became an expert in Afghanistan conflict.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ