APML rally: Musharraf backtracks on return plans

Musharraf says he will come back only if his party is successful in a ‘show of strength’.


Abdul Manan April 18, 2011

LAHORE:


In an apparent backtracking from his party’s earlier stance, former President Pervez Musharraf has linked his return to Pakistan to the level of support his political party, the All Pakistan Muslim League (APML), is able to muster.


The statement is in contrast to what a party spokesperson said on Friday when he announced that Musharraf would be returning to Pakistan by the end of the year, without giving any qualifying conditions for the return.

The former president was addressing a rally of APML workers in Lahore on Sunday and laid out the party’s three-stage strategy for making headway in national politics.

In the first stage, said Musharraf, the party would create liaison committees at the district and provincial level. In the second stage, the party would decide to conduct a “show of strength” across the country. If the first two stages are successful, then the former president would make the decision to return to Pakistan.

In the third phase, Musharraf said he would lead the party in a campaign for the 2013 general elections. He claimed that the party would be able to win an absolute majority in the National Assembly, though he hinted that the party was open to alliances with other “like-minded” political parties.

APML leaders attended a rally in Lahore organised by the Karachi-based Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), in what many saw as the beginnings of a potential alliance. Musharraf had cordial relations with the MQM when he was president.

Musharraf denied rumours that he had been trying to meet Nawaz Sharif, who was in London for medical treatment.

“Nawaz used to give enmity in exchange of sympathies and I never expect anything good from him,” said the former president of the PML-N chief.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 18th,  2011.

COMMENTS (64)

Ahmad | 13 years ago | Reply @Adeel: After all the bluster of me distorting facts, all you could come up was one point. A single point. Which doesn't really negate mine. Just because industry grew because of increased commodity prices doesn't mean we're not going to accept that money. Why is industry hamstrung? Maybe because Mush didnt add a single MW to the grid in a decade. Electricity generation isnt increasing because of circular debt, debt left to us by Mush. You see, not everyone can be a dictator and get free dollars. The democrats always get loans while dictators get 'aid' and free equipment. WAPDA's chairman went to your leader, and told him about the dire need of adding electricity. He was, quite literally, told to shut up. And when Mush's electricity wizards were asked why they didnt expand the grid, their answer was: How were we to know that silting would take place? And increasing international commodity prices help growers and suppliers in agriculture, who are much better off, but we never read about that in the paper do we? As to your education point, here's India's definition of literacy, and remember, we were formed at the same time; they've had exactly the same amount of time as us. The working definition of literacy in the Indian census since 1991 is as follows: Literacy rate: The total percentage of the population of an area at a particular time aged seven years or above who can read and write with understanding. Here the denominator is the population aged seven years or more. Crude literacy rate: The total percentage of the people of an area at a particular time aged seven years or above who can read and write with understanding, taking the total population of the area (including below seven years of age) as the denominator. And naturally, you could go on, but you dont do you? That tells me something. And, fyi, its dumb, not 'damb'.
Amer | 13 years ago | Reply Mushy uncle you are playing games with us just like uncle Sam plays games!! Stop fooling us, we weren't born yesterday (at least not all of us ;) ), you are nothing more then a common criminal on the run now! What a pathetic existance! I bet your dogs enjoy living in London more then you do! LOL
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ