Sunny
High: 34°C
Low: 28°C
Alerts
 
< >

The disturbing case of Faisal Shahzad

Published: May 11, 2010

The writer is a professor at Montclair State University in New Jersey, US (fawzia.khan@tribune.com.pk)

As a Pakistani-American who has lived, studied and worked in the US for 30 years and raised a family with a man who, like me, came here from Pakistan as a student, the case of Faisal Shahzad has raised more disturbing questions than any others involving accusations of terrorism against Pakistani-American citizens. The most prominent accusation in the news recently has been the case of Dr Aafia Siddiqui, a neuro (not nuclear) scientist trained at MIT and taught at Brandeis University. According to most accounts, she was kidnapped on the streets of Karachi and resurfaced in Bagram where she was tortured, possibly raped, lost her children and ended up in US prisons — mentally, physically and emotionally destroyed. The US government’s case against her, which was based on nothing more than unproven allegations of chemicals found in her purse and later charges of her pulling a heavy rifle at US soldiers at the Afghani base – a ridiculous assertion given her slight weight (90 pounds) – and no forensic evidence whatsoever, was such a travesty of justice that it unequivocally called forth rightful condemnation from the Pakistani-American community as well as informed Americans of all ethnicities and backgrounds. The case of Faisal Shahzad, however, is very different, puzzling, and downright scary in its implications for us all.

Here is a young man who was raised in what appears to have been a fairly liberal, well-off, well-connected and well-educated family in Pakistan. His father is a retired air marshall in the Pakistani Air Force. Then he comes to the US for higher studies, goes to a respectable university and marries a young Pakistani-American woman who it seems may have grown up here. From a photograph on the net, she appears to be an attractive, well put-together, non-hijabi woman. They have two young kids. For a while they lead a pretty good life, living in an upscale suburb of Connecticut, in a house that proved to be too expensive to maintain mortgage payments on once the recession hit, affecting countless folks like them who were already living beyond their means and then got laid off — as did Mr Shahzad.

This is the bare-bone narrative of Mr Shahzad’s life prior to becoming a recruit for the Pakistani Tehreek-i-Taliban, and it reads like one many in the Pakistan-American community would be familiar with. It is the post-scenario that is scary because the question it raises for many of us is: how did he go from being part of the immigrant American dream to a poster-child for terrorism? The usual explanations such as those of class, race, religion, gender or ethnic oppression simply do not apply here. The only thesis that suggests itself is one involving loss of economic security, leading to a sense of shame and loss of face within the community — particularly acute for a man in a patriarchal class system, where his worth is assessed by the number of toys he can acquire and retain. Such a psychological state can become an easy recruiting tool for extremist ideology, particularly one rooted in an obscurantist and hate-driven interpretation of religion, in this case Islam — a return to which is portrayed by extremists as the cure for all ills emanating from western capitalist societies like the US.

While there are serious problems of class oppression, racism, and sexism which are endemic to a world dominated by a capitalist, patriarchal order that has to date benefited colonial and imperial powers and the neo-colonial elites, Mr Shahzad’s case hardly proffers a solution. Quite the contrary: he is part of the very elite his behaviour hypocritically condemns. Planting bombs in crowded places where intended victims are innocent folks representing all creeds and classes, is not going to change the system. Rather, his criminal thoughtlessness will bring more, not less harassment of those at the bottom of the economic heap from all backgrounds — and to Muslim Americans of all classes and ethnicities, particularly those from Pakistan.

Published in the Express Tribune, May 11th, 2010.

Reader Comments (11)

  • Meekal Ahmed
    May 11, 2010 - 1:06AM

    I agree with you Madam that it was the economics of it and the sense of shame he felt. That made him vulnerable and susceptible to doing something rash and extreme.

    Not only did he default on his mortgage but he had been summoned to court over some other financial matter and there was a notice from a debt collector according to stuff found in his garbage bin.

    I have written a short piece entitled: “Shattered Dreams”. I think it is an apt title (apart from being a great song!).Recommend

  • Rana Taimoor
    May 11, 2010 - 9:47AM

    Its a drama, just like the Swat video justifying operation in Swat. Just like the terror attacks in Lahore on FIA building (that was already destroyed because of a suicide bombing earlier in the year), Elite Force training school that leads to operation in South Waziristan. Here is another Drama plotted by the agencies for justifying drone strikes in Pakistan and providing yet another “credible” reason for north waziristan operation.Recommend

  • Muhammad Ramzan
    May 11, 2010 - 1:25PM

    We don’t know excactly what motive has triggered Shahzad to go for such an extreme step. But we can say that it was a totally reckless step which has landed the whole Muslim community and especially Pakistani in clouds of suspecisions and troubles. Being an educated person, he should have thought on the repercussions of such drastic act. Already 9/11 has destroyed the lives of many Muslim in the whole world apart from badly tarnishing the image of Islam.

    Being Muslim, we should set an example for others that Islam never allows playing havoc with the life of humanity irrespective of race, cast, creed and religion.Recommend

  • Meekal Ahmed
    May 11, 2010 - 4:37PM

    Well said Mr Ramzan but look at the comment just above you.Recommend

  • May 11, 2010 - 6:45PM

    Yes most accounts (in pakistan) claim Aafia was kidnapped and raped and tortured for 7 year. You forgot to mention that all these accounts are based on nothing but rumours. The “heavy” gun she picked up weighed 4 lbs.
    She lost her case because she had 7 eye witnesses against her and was caught lying more than once.Recommend

  • May 11, 2010 - 6:47PM

    It’s easy to see how Faisal could be radicalized when he is exposed to the hundreds of Pakistani news sources and bloggers that feed on anti-americanism and conpiracies that demonize the west.Recommend

  • Bangash
    May 11, 2010 - 10:14PM

    @Rana Taimoor

    The Swat video of flogging the girl was genuine, and if for some reason you call it fake, then you can watch many other videos in which Taliban flog Pakistanis, behead people and burn equipment. There are also many videos available of the Taliban proudly acknowledging their bomb attacks all over Pakistan.

    So wake up and smell the roses.Recommend

  • Dr. Ghulam Murtaza Khuhro
    May 12, 2010 - 9:31AM

    We can and we must delve deeper to reflect the causes and environment creating Shahzad’s, for it is must to divert the road of more Shahazad’s waiting in the wings to better options, yet any act leading to or helping happening of terrorist act cannot and should not be condoned. However, it will not be out of place to mention that outburst in favour of guiltiness is also equally damaging and distracting.
    A balanced approach will help distinguish you from Madam Hillary’s impulsive reaction.Recommend

  • Ammar
    May 12, 2010 - 1:02PM

    @ Rana Taimor, I fail to understand the acute denial syndrome of your creed. As terrorism is a global and imminent threat and rather than seeking refuge in bizarre conspiracy theories we need to embark upon corrective measures for countering terrorism.

    @Bangash Thank you for the reality check!Recommend

  • May 13, 2010 - 11:46PM

    There are many reported cases in which educated, urbane people like Faisal did things they weren’t supposed to do. You can easily recall the case of Muhammad Ata, the chief operations manager of 9/11 plane attacks in USA. He was educated, well-off, clean shaven and attended regular dance parties in Germany. I am sure someone somewhere must have got hold of him and told him, ‘Hey, Ata, do Islam a favor: Blow up the Americans’. And that’s what he and others did. Kill and maim in the name of Islam without learning the true concepts of Islam or what it teaches. Faisal is no different.Recommend

  • M. Shahbaz Butt
    May 16, 2010 - 3:58PM

    it is true that deprived economic condition of a person trigger to do some terrible acts.
    but this theory is not apply on faisal’s case.he belong to rich family and his family may bear his mortgage payments.
    now study this case categorically.
    when US government declare that they caught a terrorist during planting a bomb at times square, within one our pak foreign minister announces that it is reaction against drone attacks which means that US and Pak foreign minister already decided that Faisal is a terrorist.
    after one day US foreign minister said that if this is done again then we will take operation in Pkistan.this is open threat by US to our country and our sovereignty but our leaders just doing nothing they fawn on upon in front of US government.
    it a drama and create it for putting pressure on Pak army to take operation in waziristan and other areas of pakistan.so be careful about your country and your nation…Recommend

More in Opinion

X