Looking forward: Grand nephew struggles to answer why Muhammad Ali Jinnah is relevant today

Liaquat Merchant gives lecture on Pakistan's founder at AKU.


Hamna Zubair January 20, 2011

KARACHI: SI Senior Advocate Liaquat H Merchant, the grandson of Jinnah’s sister Mariambai, struggled to answer why Jinnah is relevant today, even though he was invited by Aga Khan University to speak on the topic.

A large crowd of mostly senior citizens but also students, faculty and journalists, had gathered to hear Merchant speak. Rida Turabi, who helped promote the event, said the lecture was part of a series of talks on issues relevant to Pakistani society.

Merchant is the president of the Jinnah Society and the founder and managing trustee of the Jinnah Foundation. Due to his family links, Merchant possessed a wealth of information on Jinnah’s life, his family and his estate.

“We ought to develop leadership on the values of private honour and public integrity, according to the precedent set by Jinnah,” he said. In an attempt to show the audience the impact of Jinnah’s personality on other leaders, Merchant read out a series of tributes to Jinnah collected by the Jinnah Society. Sir Sultan Mohammad Shah, Aga Khan III, former US President Harry S Truman, Akbar A Ahmed and Lieutenant General (retd) Sahabzada Yaqub Khan were among those who praised Jinnah’s “incorruptible” nature.

Merchant also tried to clear up lingering confusions about Jinnah’s actual birthplace. When an audience member said he had heard Jinnah was actually born in Jhirk, a town in Sindh, Merchant admitted that this could be possible, but added: “The most important thing is that he was born in this part of the world and that he was a leader”.

“He seems like a nice man,” whispered an audience member during the speech. “But I don’t see how this discussion relates to the topic at all.”

Much of Merchant’s presentation was, however, spent highlighting Jinnah’s ideology and personal achievements rather than analysing the great man’s relevance in today’s world.

Issues such as education and Pakistan’s current-day political stability were only addressed in the question-and-answer session that followed the lecture. It was at this point that Merchant allowed that “had Jinnah concentrated solely on creating an appropriate Constitution before his death, we might have been in a better place.”

In response to a question about Pakistan’s educational system, Merchant said the education board should introduce a subject that teaches children about Jinnah’s ideals and values, so that he may serve as a more accessible role model.

The affection that Pakistanis still feel for their founding father was evident in the abundant applause that followed the mention of each of Jinnah’s achievements. The question of his significance today can be judged by the fact that when a faculty member leaned into the microphone at the end of the lecture to ask: “How many of you think Jinnah is relevant today?” Only half the audience members raised their hands.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 21st, 2011.

COMMENTS (12)

QUASIR AMIR | 13 years ago | Reply he leader of not only pakistan but of the world his ideology z of same importance today as it was in past in my view he z above all leaders as he has not only brought revolution in the history but also created a new state in land of those people who were even not familiar to his language as Jinnah used to talk in English n people were familiar with Urdu....
Grasshopper | 13 years ago | Reply @jahangir Really? Gandhi over Jinnah? Here's a paragraph from the wall street journal published nov. 9, 2010: "Above all, I don't mean Mr. Obama's reverential bows to the memory of Mahatma Gandhi, whose "message of love and peace," as the president put it, is just a little marred by the details of his biography. Among them, his support for the caste system; his refusal to allow his wife to get a penicillin shot that might have saved her life; the "Dear Friend" letter he addressed to Adolf Hitler, whom he also described as "not a bad man"; and his belief that the British—and the Czechs, and the Jews—should have offered no more than nonviolent resistance to the Nazis." really?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ