Taliban threaten second Afghan provincial capital as insurgency spreads

Taliban warn motorists to avoid the key transport corridor linking the capital to the south


Reuters October 12, 2015
Taliban warned motorists to avoid the key transport corridor linking the capital to the south. PHOTO: AFP

KABUL: Fighting intensified around the Afghan city of Ghazni on Monday, as Taliban militants threatened to seize a second provincial capital after briefly occupying Kunduz in the north last month.

The clashes around Ghazni, some 130 km southwest of Kabul, underlined the worsening security situation across Afghanistan, where national soldiers and police are struggling to cope now the bulk of foreign forces have withdrawn.

Monday's violence followed days of sporadic fighting near Ghazni, and prompted most shops, schools and universities there to close.

Many residents attempted to flee to the capital Kabul or nearby districts, adding to a growing number of internally displaced people within Afghanistan.

Government officials said they still had the upper hand.

"Hundreds of Taliban attacked from two directions and the fighting is still on some 7 km away from the provincial capital," Ghazni's Deputy Governor Mohammad Ali Ahmadi told Reuters.

Read: Taliban suicide attack targets NATO convoy in Kabul

"The Taliban planned to attack and seize the capital but we were on the alert and repelled them," he said.

The hardline militant movement, seeking to topple the Western-backed government in Kabul and restore its regime 14 years after being toppled, also said it had blocked the highway from Kabul to the southern city of Kandahar.

The Taliban warned motorists to avoid the key transport corridor linking the capital to the south, which was rebuilt with the help of Western aid. There was no independent confirmation of their claim to have blocked the route.

Earlier on Monday, a local UN staffer was shot and killed by two gunmen on a motorbike as she was on her way to work in Kandahar.

"She was fatally wounded and later died in hospital," said Mujib ur Rahman, a UN press officer in Kandahar.

On Sunday, a suicide bomber attacked a convoy of foreign troops during Sunday morning rush hour in Kabul, wounding at least three civilians.

Kunduz warning

Since the withdrawal of international troops from most combat operations at the end of last year, the brunt of fighting has been borne by Afghan forces.

Read: Rare new picture surfaces of Taliban founder Mullah Omar

Any hopes of a negotiated settlement with the Taliban were dealt a blow earlier this year, when a power struggle broke out following confirmation that the movement's founder, Mullah Omar, had died two years earlier.

Under new leader Mullah Akhtar Mansour, the Taliban have mounted a wave of attacks in Kabul and beyond, culminating in the seizure of Kunduz in a carefully orchestrated offensive.

While some areas in mountainous regions near Pakistan and in the southern province of Helmand have long been under the control of the Taliban, the fall of once sleepy Kunduz, some 230 km from Kabul, represented a sharp escalation.

It was the first time the Taliban, which imposed harsh Islamic law when in power including public executions and denying women the right to education and work, had taken a major provincial capital since 2001. Government forces have since wrested back control of most of Kunduz.

It was also a stark warning of how far the Taliban has extended its reach into regions once thought secure, stretching government forces and piling pressure on President Ashraf Ghani's fragile national unity government.

Read: Reconciliation with Taliban: Precondition set for Islamabad’s role in peace talks

The worsening violence has caused alarm in Washington, where President Barack Obama must decide on whether or not to stick to an earlier decision to cut US troop levels in Aghanistan to a small US embassy-based force after 2016.

COMMENTS (2)

Saira Khan | 9 years ago | Reply whatever strategy US follows, it has historically shown itself to be incompetent when it comes to understanding how to deal with afghanistan. we dont want our neighbors to live under US occupied forces that do nothing but steal opium. it might be better to send in the russians to deal this time.
Stranger | 9 years ago | Reply then Afghan forces will take over then T will come then Afghan forces will take over and ...
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ