Nine dead, dozens wounded in air strike on Kunduz hospital

At the time of the bombing, 105 patients and over 80 international and local MSF staff were in the hospital


Afp October 03, 2015
PHOTO: AFP/FILE

KABUL: A suspected US air strike on a hospital in Kunduz Saturday left nine Doctors Without Borders staff dead and dozens of others seriously wounded, the charity said, days after Taliban insurgents overran the northern Afghan city.

The MSF facility is seen as a key medical lifeline in the region and has been running "beyond capacity" during recent fighting that saw the Taliban seize control of the northern provincial capital for several days.

The strike early Saturday left the building engulfed in flames, with photos posted by MSF on Twitter showing shocked and dazed staff in the aftermath of the bombing.

"At 2:10 am (2040 GMT) local time... the MSF trauma centre in Kunduz was hit several times during sustained bombing and was very badly damaged," it said in a statement.

"It is with deep sadness that we confirm so far the death of nine MSF staff during the bombing... 37 people were seriously wounded... There are many patients and staff who remain unaccounted for."

Read: MSF says gave location of hospital bombed by airstrike to Afghan, US forces

Kunduz has seen heavy fighting since Taliban insurgents overran it on Monday. It was the first major city to be captured by militants since 2001.

MSF said some 105 patients and their caregivers, as well as more than 80 international and local MSF staff were in the hospital at the time of the bombing.

The charity had stated Friday it was treating 59 children at the facility.

NATO conceded that US forces may have been behind the strike.

"US forces conducted an air strike in Kunduz city at 2:15 am (local time)... against individuals threatening the force," a NATO statement said.

"The strike may have resulted in collateral damage to a nearby medical facility. This incident is under investigation."

The destroyed MSF building was filled with the smell of burning flesh and some bodies were charred beyond recognition, said Qiamudeen, a 31-year-old shopkeeper whose neighbour was killed in the strike.

"I was shocked, emotional and in tears when I reached the hospital," Qiamudeen, who goes by one name, told AFP.

Read: Islamabad says Taliban takeover of Kunduz unacceptable

"I had to get permission from Taliban insurgents blocking several parts of the city, desperately pleading with them to let me go to the hospital as my neighbour had been killed."

Another resident said he was anxiously trying to contact six of his friends, all doctors and nurses at MSF, but their cellphones were unreachable.

"I don't have any news from them and they may have been killed," he told AFP.

He said many people with wounded relatives at the facility were too afraid to step out of their homes to check on them amid erratic firefights between troops and Taliban snipers lurking in the city.

The Afghan government insists the city is firmly in their control.

The MSF trauma centre in Kunduz is the only medical facility in the whole northeastern region of Afghanistan that can deal with major injuries.

"We are deeply shocked by the attack, the killing of our staff... and the heavy toll it has inflicted on healthcare in Kunduz," MSF director of operations Bart Janssens said in a statement.

"We do not yet have the final casualty figures, but our medical team are providing first aid and treating the injured patients. We urge all parties to respect the safety of health facilities and staff."

Kunduz is facing a humanitarian crisis, with thousands of civilians caught in the crossfire between government forces and insurgents.

Precise losses in the fighting were not known, but health authorities said Friday that at least 60 people have been killed and 400 wounded.

"This is an appalling tragedy," the International Committee of the Red Cross said about Saturday's strike.

Read: Afghan forces retake control of Kunduz from Taliban

"Such attacks against health workers and facilities undermine the capacity of humanitarian organisations to assist the Afghan people at a time when they most urgently need it."

As fighting spreads in neighbouring Badakhshan, Takhar and Baghlan provinces, concerns are mounting that the seizure of Kunduz was merely the opening gambit in a new, bolder Taliban strategy to tighten the insurgency's grip across northern Afghanistan.

The Taliban's offensive in Kunduz, their biggest tactical success since 2001, marks a major blow for Afghanistan's Western-trained forces, who have largely been fighting on their own since last December.

Civilian and military casualties caused by NATO forces have been one of the most contentious issues in the 14-year campaign against Taliban insurgents, provoking harsh public and government criticism.

In a statement, the Taliban accused "barbaric American forces" of deliberately carrying out Saturday's strike, which "killed and wounded tens of doctors, nurses and patients".

US-led NATO forces ended their combat mission in Afghanistan last December, though a 13,000-strong residual force remains for training and counter-terrorism operations.

But there has been an escalation in air strikes by NATO forces in recent months despite the drawdown.

COMMENTS (2)

shahid | 9 years ago | Reply Country with technology to do Precision Bombing including passing missile or bomb thru a window of a house; states "MAY HAVE HIT" Hospital ????? It this a joke that people are so stupid they dont know that it is a deliberate hit to kill people; I would have agreed if it was a british or US hospital then it could be believed as a 'may have hit' story. Then we would see how the press would be full of sorry stories and condolences.
Muhammad Khan | 9 years ago | Reply If this hospital has been hit by the US Air Force, then it is going to be dubbed as collateral loss of life and damage to properties. No one will be held responsible or punished for this.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ