Foul-mouthed Kvyat puts Red Bull on top

Russian clocked fastest time with Ferrari’s Raikkonen finishing second.


Afp September 18, 2015
Red Bull driver Daniil Kvyat of Russia takes a corner during the practice session of the Formula One Singapore Grand Prix in Singapore on September 18, 2015. AFP

SINGAPORE: Red Bull’s Daniil Kvyat stole the limelight and upstaged record-seeking Lewis Hamilton when he timed quickest in smog-hit free practice for the Singapore Grand Prix on Friday.

The 21-year-old Russian was the surprise pace-setter with a leading time of 1min 46.142 sec at the Marina Bay Street Circuit, ahead of Ferrari’s Kimi Raikkonen in second.

Daniel Ricciardo was third quickest in the second Red Bull with Hamilton, bidding to equal a clutch of milestones set by the late Ayrton Senna, down in fourth on the timesheets.

The unusual make-up of the leaderboard, in a season dominated by the Mercedes cars of Hamilton and Nico Rosberg, hints at an unpredictable weekend in prospect.

“We’re not happy with the performance today,” fumed Mercedes boss Toto Wolff. “We haven’t really made the tyres in the way we should on the one-lap performance.”

Championship leader Hamilton is trying to equal Senna’s record of eight straight pole positions as well as the late Brazilian’s career tally of 41 wins from 161 races.

The Briton leads the standings by 53 points from Rosberg, putting him well on course to match his boyhood idol Senna’s haul of three world titles.

Haze caused by Southeast Asian forest fires was measured at unhealthy levels during Friday’s practice sessions, held under floodlights at the downtown layout. The smog could cause concern for the weekend, after Jenson Button warned earlier of the potential health risks of strenuous driving in polluted air.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 19th,  2015.

Like Sports on Facebook, follow @ETribuneSports on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ