Development budget cuts

Editorial April 28, 2010

The revelation that the federal government plans to cut its allocation towards the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) by 30 per cent should not necessarily be seen in bad light. The primary reason given for the cut is that the federal government no longer needs to budget for provincial allocations, since provincial governments will now be given a larger share of the overall revenues of the government. In essence, the federal government is simply making good on its promise to transfer more fiscal control towards the provinces, thus reducing its own outlays.

This re-allocation of resources is expected to have the dual effect of increasing provincial financial autonomy while reducing the federal government’s budget deficit. One anticipates this measure as being good for the political economy of the nation. It is up to the provinces to maintain the right balance between fiscal discipline and spending as necessary, in order to encourage development and growth. This is a task for which the provincial governments are not yet prepared, and teething problems are to be expected. Nevertheless, this measure, while likely to be somewhat chaotic at the outset, was necessary in order to move the nation towards a more representative and functional democracy.

We recommend focusing on programmes that are likely to deliver long-term economic gains rather than boosting the short-term political popularity of elected officials, admittedly a temptation difficult to resist for most politicians. They should, however, realise that they have been sent to their respective political capitals to do what is best for the country and not their own political careers. This necessarily means greater transparency in the allocation of PSDP funds to various projects, especially keeping in mind relevance and need.


Nadir El Edroos | 13 years ago | Reply The actual sum of the PSDP is not necessarily important. What is more important is the quality of the allocation of whatever sums are available. If the PSDP is being cut, then it is the responsibility of the government to reduce waste and inefficiencies to make sure that as much of the budgeted amount receives the intended recipient. This of course means tackling corruption, however, business cannot continue as usual. Too much is at stake to allow projects to be delayed, for contractors to miss deadlines, for delays in tendering and bidding.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ