China’s economic future

Published: September 13, 2015
Email
The writer is a former caretaker finance minister and served as vice-president at the World Bank

The writer is a former caretaker finance minister and served as vice-president at the World Bank

There is impressive and ongoing change in the global, political and economic systems of which the policymakers in Islamabad should take cognisance. There is a marked slowdown in the rate of increase in global output. This is partly the consequence of the 30 per cent decline in the rate of increase in China’s national product. There is growing tension between Washington and Beijing as each attempts to protect what are considered to be its national interests in the western part of the Pacific Ocean. This has led to a realignment of nations around the Pacific Rim with the United States seeking close collaboration with Japan, India, and Australia, and China looking west and developing close relations with Russia, Pakistan, the Central Asian republics and possibly, Afghanistan. There is turmoil in the Middle East with four ongoing civil wars displacing almost four million people from their homes. A large number of these people, having given up all hope of returning to their homes, are heading towards Europe. The Middle East crisis has spilt over into Europe. This has reaffirmed once again, what has been described as the process of globalisation.

Change almost always is disruptive and the one occurring now in 2015 is no exception. In addition to the wars in the Middle East and the refugee crisis in Europe, the past several weeks have seen enormous turbulence in the world’s financial markets. This has been attributed to the secular decline in the rates of growth in the old economies of Europe and North America, and the significant structural changes that are underway in China. The latter is of enormous significance for Pakistan given its increasingly close relations with Beijing. If China stumbles, Pakistan will stumble along with it. In the article today, I will examine what was expected of China in the decade and a half to the year 2030. I will follow that discussion next week with an analysis of whether the recent events in the global financial market should be the cause for reassessing China’s economic prospects.

In 2013, about the time the reins of government in China passed into the powerful hands of President Xi Jinping, the World Bank published a report titled “China 2030”. The authors asked two questions: can China’s growth rate still be among the highest in the world even if it slows from its current rapid pace; and can it maintain the rapid growth with little disruption to the world, the environment and the fabric of its own society? Its answer to the two questions was a qualified ‘yes’. The qualification was whether China will be able to transition from the policies that served it so well in the past to ones that address the very different challenges of a very different future.

Over the past four decades, China had broken the trend of the past two centuries and had moved to where it was half a millennium ago. From the early 1500s until the early 1800s, China’s economy was the world’s largest. By 1820, it was again one-fifth as big as Europe’s and accounted for a third of the world’ combined gross domestic product. But the next two centuries were tumultuous, largely because of the intrusion of several European states as well as the United States in its affairs. The country went through catastrophic decline from 1820 to 1980. However, that trend was reversed by the careful adoption of growth inducing policies. An average rate of growth of 9.9 per cent was achieved over the last 35 years. In 2015, the size of the Chinese economy was 32 times larger than in 1980. During this period, some 500 million people had been lifted out of poverty and into the middle class. But that breakneck speed could not be maintained. Even a rate of growth of seven per cent a year in the next half decade, which President Xi has called the “new normal”, will require hard policy work. What are the policies that should be adopted? In its report, the World Bank proposes six areas of policy attention.

The first is the implementation of structural reforms to strengthen the foundations for a market-based economy. That has been done to a considerable degree but more will be needed. The second is to adopt a set of policies that will be friendly to the environment. This is required to save its own citizens from developments such as atmospheric pollution, which is so severe in some cities that it has begun to seriously affect citizens’ health. China also has to meet its obligations to the international community to control the emissions of greenhouse gases to reduce global warming. Third, China will need to accelerate the pace of innovation and create an open innovation system. The fourth area will require expanding the opportunities and promotion of social security for all citizens. Without this, the Chinese will continue to save more than they should and not spend enough on current consumption to add another driver of economic growth. The fifth area requires strengthening of the fiscal system so that the state can pay for providing better health and education to the rapidly growing middle class. Sixth, China will need to focus on developing mutually beneficial relations with the world. But for that to happen, the world will have to be less grudging in accommodating China.

With these changes in place, the World Bank estimates that the rate of growth of the Chinese economy will decline to seven per cent a year in 2016-26, and to five per cent in 2026-30.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 14th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (8)

  • Mahakaalchakra
    Sep 14, 2015 - 1:23AM

    Author, please share your thoughts and predictions about China’s territorial disputes with surrounding democracies such as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Myanmar, Bhutan, and India, and impact of Chinese economic downturn on CPEC in your next series of articleRecommend

  • os
    Sep 14, 2015 - 3:24AM

    There was absolutely no point to this article .we could have read the executive summary for the report mentioned and learnt moreRecommend

  • rk singh
    Sep 14, 2015 - 6:14AM

    china was never a stable nation in all of history. I believe it never will be.Recommend

  • Union Jack
    Sep 14, 2015 - 11:57AM

    With economic development, China started thinking it is entitled to be bully. Instead of amicably resolving issues it is flexing muscles on countries less than one tenth its own size. This does not go well for the nation trying to create an image of responsible world power. It is turning too many apple carts with it’s arrogance and that has only resulted in most nations devising economical strategy to contain it. World forgets many many times that Russia was broken into pieces for it’s similar arrogance. Same will be fate of China if does not learn quick and make right friends. Using Pakistan to contain India is futile and waste of it’s time and money. Making friends with India and strengthening BRICS economic co-operation will be the right way to sustain it’s own growth and have partnership with stable nations. Most importantly it has to stop it’s expansionist goals. Through out history borders have been drawn many time. Countries have grown and empires had shrunk. Recommend

  • Feroz
    Sep 14, 2015 - 1:08PM

    The Chinese will be able to take care of themselves with a much slower growth rate. However the question to be asked is whether a boxed in and slow growing China will have enough resources to bale out its all weather friends. Commodity producers are already being ravaged by dropping prices from the slowdown in China. This is a golden opportunity for all of them to diversify their export portfolio and dependence on China.Recommend

  • KSS
    Sep 14, 2015 - 3:23PM

    Its known and accepted by most Economists around the world that Chinese had been fudging their figures for long time.

    Even 7% mentioned for current year is more likely 5%.

    Nevertheless, even with fudging figures, one can not deny overall success of China and its impact on rest of the world.

    KSSRecommend

  • Adam S
    Sep 15, 2015 - 4:43AM

    While I hear how Chi and India had the largest GDPs before Western colonialists arrived, surely one must take this with a large grain of salt. GDP, economics, globalization and other measures as we understand them are modern Western concepts. So, such statements are bogus and unrealistic.Recommend

  • globalobserver
    Sep 15, 2015 - 8:54AM

    “Sixth, China will need to focus on developing mutually beneficial relations with the world. But for that to happen, the world will have to be less grudging in accommodating China.”

    China has picked fights with all its neighbors and the western world due to its aggressive geopolitical revisionist polities. Why shouldn’t China’s neighbors and the world be less “grudging” and accommodate Chinese aggression? It is China that is flexing its muscles and seeks confrontation. All the major countries with the exception of Pakistan have a deep mistrust with china.Recommend

More in Opinion