Escalation of violence

As we approach 2014, Pakistanis will face increasing attacks in Fata, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan and Karachi.

Khalid Aziz December 21, 2010
Escalation of violence

The US has just concluded its review of the AfPak policy. There is hardly any change of direction. However, it has noted that more has to be done by Pakistan, specifically by launching a counterterrorist operation in North Waziristan and removing safe havens. Apparently, the Pentagon has prevailed and the US will continue to advance a militaristic approach to the Taliban problem. Secondly, the review has effectively negated Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s attempt to reconcile with the Taliban — this would have failed in any case without a genuine attempt at reconciliation based on power sharing. Thirdly, US Vice President Joe Biden has said that US forces will withdraw by 2014. The date was established by Nato leaders in their recent conference in Lisbon. So what does this mean for Pakistan?

Some indications are available from recent military activity in Kandahar and Helmand provinces in Afghanistan, as well as the expansion of drone attacks into Tirah — which is situated about 25km west of Peshawar. These two policies clearly indicate that General Petraeus has been given the go ahead to use the full muscle of the ‘surge’ strategy and stabilise the hot spots of Taliban militancy by force and to hit their safe havens in Fata.

Thus, all bets are off and if the nature of current operations is an indicator, we are likely to see an escalation of violence by Nato in the region before it departs in 2014. There are already reports of demolition of homes and habitations around Kandahar and in Helmand. This, coupled with night operations by Special Operations Forces on Afghan homes is a sure recipe for making enemies and not friends. Thirdly, Pakhtuns do not react generically to violence — something that escapes many analysts — they react within their tradition, according to which one becomes a lesser Pakhtun if a wrong done to one, is not avenged. Honour demands revenge. This may have increased the pressure on the militants but such operations cause a backlash. The surge will be of no avail in the final analysis.

On the Pakistani front there has been an escalation in drone attacks against safe havens of militants. This escalation was in two parts. It began with an exponential increase in the number of drone attacks on North Waziristan in the last four months, particularly in Mirali and Datta Khel tehsils. Apparently, there appears to be an Ibrahim Khel and Daur tribe centrality in this resistance and their association with the Haqqani network.

However, what should be a matter of deep concern to us is the escalation of the drone war to Afridi Tirah, only a few miles from Peshawar. According to available information, there have been four drone attacks so far in Tirah on December 16 and 17. These attacks were followed by helicopter gunship sorties that destroyed homes, killed about 55 people and injured many more. There were 25 collateral deaths.

The intervention in Tirah indicates Nato’s as well as the Pakistan military’s resolve to secure the Nato logistic supply line through Khyber. It has been the target of frequent attacks. As we approach 2014, Pakistanis will face increasing attacks in Fata, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan and Karachi.

It is, thus, advisable for parliament to review the situation and monitor the implementation of the joint resolution passed on October 22, 2008 — increasing attacks on Pakistani territory will cause many problems and will cause a political crisis in the days to come.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 22nd, 2010.


R S JOHAR | 13 years ago | Reply The writer has written a very thought provoking article. He has however not touched upon Pak army's strategy on providing safe havens to Afghan Talebans whom they want back as rulers of Afghanistan despite their past record of barbaric rule and their refusal to co-operate with Pak govt. The present situation is far worse now with Pak Taleban fighting army and with its infrastructure still intact is most likely to join hands with Afghan Taleban to complete their unfinished agenda of enforcing sharia by force in Pakistan. Notwithstanding above, there is every likelyhood of Panjab terror outfits joining the above duo making it the most deadly combination which Pak army will have to contend with. Moreover, they will be mounting mass suicide and surprise attacks all over in Pakistan resulting in bloodshed of innocent civilians creating unrest in the whole country. It will be in the interest of Pakistan to revisit the whole issue by its army, ruling party along with opposition and not commit this harakiri which may not only spell doom for Pakistan but for the whole region.
Saira Humayun | 13 years ago | Reply Author presents very astute analysis of current security situation in region. Now it’s time for Pakistan to handle this power game more intelligently and should not compromise on its national interest and national security. Pakistan Policy makers should wisely make policies to cope with the post US withdrawal challenges .Hope, we will see more articles from author
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ