Corruption in the IPL

The Indian court’s verdict provides an acid test for the ICC’s zero-tolerance policy towards corruption in the game


Editorial July 16, 2015
In this photograph taken on May 12, 2012, Chennai SuperKings (CSK) captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni (R), CSK owner Gurunath Meiyappan (C) and cricketer Ben Hilfenhaus (L) attend the presentation ceremony during the IPL Twenty20 cricket match between Chennai Super Kings and Delhi Daredevils at The M.A.Chidambaram Stadium in Chennai. PHOTO: AFP

Two years after the damning 2013 Indian Premier League (IPL) corruption scandal emerged, the fate of the tournament now hangs in the balance. After a lengthy legal process, the Indian Supreme Court suspended two former champion teams — Chennai Super Kings (CSK) and Rajasthan Royals — for two years, and slapped their owners with lifelong bans preventing them from participating in any cricket-related activity. Since the advent of the IPL in 2008, allegations of corruption, spot- and match-fixing have marred the tournament. The glamour, the larger-than-life parties and night life have all been an integral feature of the league. While these elements supposedly help glamourise the event, they also provide an opportunity for the infamous Indian underworld to flex its muscles.

Doubts over the source of wealth of some of the owners of various franchises had emerged in the past, however, the BCCI turned a blind eye to this aspect. The IPL now faces a possible crippling blow both to its reputation and business. At the same time, the Indian court’s verdict provides an acid test for the ICC’s zero-tolerance policy towards corruption in the game. At the helm of the body sits N Srinivasan, the father-in-law of one of the banned owners, and a co-owner of CSK. Mr Srinivasan is the ICC chairman and is set to serve out at least one more year of his two-year tenure. He has often been perceived to be a major stumbling block in the attempts that have been made in the past to cleanse both the BCCI and the sport in general, of various wrongdoings. Furthermore, he was one of the driving forces behind the Big Three — India, England and Australia — virtually taking over the sport last year. The ICC needs to demonstrate that it takes corruption in the sport seriously and Mr Srinivasan needs to be asked about his role in the entire IPL saga, regardless of the position he currently enjoys at the ICC. Anything short of this will call into question the independence of the ICC, which has often been accused of operating under the shadow of the BCCI.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 17th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (2)

bharat | 5 years ago | Reply @Mr Cricket: Exactly, have you ever seen Times of India reporting on Pakistan domestic cricket tournaments ? It will never happen. IPL is a private tournament in India. It does not represent Indian cricket. Its only for entertainment
Mr Cricket | 5 years ago | Reply Mr Editor, why do you care? Your paper intentionally does not report on the IPL matches or scores. You continuously downplay the impact and scope of IPL. Since your country is not invited you ignore it. What has ICC got to do with it? It is a private event organized by BCCI in its private capacity. The Govt. of India and our law courts are dealing with what needs to dealt with. It is amusing to see your concern.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ