Sugar import: ECC brushes aside price rise fears while increasing duty

Regulatory duty increased from 20 per cent to 40 per cent on the demand of millers

Zafar Bhutta June 23, 2015
9,811 tons of sugar was imported from July-April 2014-15 at an average price of $580 per ton, according to PBS data. STOCK IMAGE

ISLAMABAD: The government has again bowed to the pressure from sugar millers who have taken control of the market with the help of economic managers as prices have increased in a month when demand for the sweetener goes up sharply.

According to officials of the Ministry of Industries, the sugar millers have not only increased prices in the domestic market, but they have also been able to convince the government to increase regulatory duty on the import of sugar. This will make the imported commodity costly in line with the increase in prices of sugar produced in the country.

The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC), in its meeting held on June 17, ignored warnings of the increase in sugar prices after the rise in regulatory duty despite the fact that the sugar market had already destabilised before the advent of Ramazan.

Read: ECC increases subsidy on sugar to Rs5 per kg

It was told that sugar price in the market had risen to Rs61.57 per kg compared to Rs55 to Rs58 before the start of Ramazan.

Earlier in the May 21 meeting, the ECC noted that the retail price of sugar was Rs55 to Rs58 per kg but the cartel of millers quoted an average price of Rs60.40 per kg in response to tenders floated for the commodity’s sale to the Utility Stores Corporation (USC). Even the lowest price quoted was higher than the rate in the retail market.

During the June 17 deliberations, the ECC was informed that sugar price in the domestic market had surged to Rs61.57 per kg, higher than the average price quoted in bids for the Ramazan relief package.

The government announced a subsidy to give an additional Rs100 million to the sugar millers in order to make the vital commodity available at utility stores.

The ECC also gave in to the pressure from the millers and increased regulatory duty from 20% to 40%.

Earlier, the Pakistan Sugar Mills Association (PSMA) had approached the government, arguing that sugar price in the international market had dropped from $450 to $360 per ton and with 20% regulatory duty, imports had become easier for the industrial concerns.

The association asked the government to fix the import trade price of sugar at $600 per ton or enhance customs duty from 20% to 50% along with imposition of anti-dumping duty to save the farmers.

Read: Sugar price: Bitter fight over a sweetener

According to data compiled by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) for July-April 2014-15, the country imported 9,811 tons of sugar at an average price of $580 per ton.

According to the weekly Sensitive Price Indicator of the PBS, the sugar price in the week ended June 11 stood at Rs61.57 per kg in the domestic market, an increase of 17% compared to Rs52.54 in December 2014.

The ECC was of the view that the request for fixing the import trade price at $600 per ton ran contrary to the commitments made under the World Trade Organisation (WTO) framework that prohibited the imposition of minimum import price.

However, Pakistan-bound tariff for sugar under the WTO was 150%. Therefore, an increase in regulatory duty to 50% was maintainable under the rules.

At the same time, it was highlighted that the increase in regulatory duty may push the prices upwards. ECC Chairman Ishaq Dar advised the ministries concerned to take up the matter with the PSMA in order to ensure price stabilisation with the rise in duty.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 24th,  2015.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

Our Publications


Woz Ahmed | 5 years ago | Reply @AN: Sir, can I ask you, do you know how many billions Pakistan spends on cleaning and rebuilding canals for irrigating land, how many billions are spent on buying produce at above market rates and then trying to sell them overseas with a huge subsidy. We are a water short country yet farmers use more than 75% of water as if it is their God given right. Dams cost trillions, but we also justify their cost in terms of flood control and irrigating land. We gift 10,000 tractors to the farming industry, we are providing free solar pumps to farmers. I have no problem with supporting our farmers, but I expect them to pay income tax and contribute , not take take take ! Agricultural research and developing new seeds, educating farmers, all comes from our taxes. You may think I am ill informed, hopefully this will give you food for thought !
AN | 5 years ago | Reply @Woz Ahmed: As a farmer I'm insulted when an ill informed person makes a sweepng statement like that. Please do let us know, what input of ours is being subsidized? Is it feritlizer? Diesel? Seeds? Pesticide? Please do not look at politicians who claim to be farmers, because most of them just use it as a cover for their corruption. Lastly if farming is so profitable, there is no bar on people to buy land in rural areas and start it. Would like to remind you that reality is far different and farmers have in fact been subsidizing consumers for the past many decades not the other way around.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ