Poll inquiry commission summons ROs over 'systematic rigging’ charge

PML-Q counsel Dr Khalid Ranjha produced seven private witnesses before the commission on Tuesday


Hasnaat Malik June 09, 2015
Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk. PHOTO: APP

ISLAMABAD: The inquiry commission has summoned seven returning officers (ROs) over their alleged involvement in ‘systematic rigging’ in the 2013 general elections.

The three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk on Tuesday observed that allegations of Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid’s (PML-Q) candidates against ROs ‘necessitate’ that they should be summoned for cross examination.

The commission has, therefore, asked its secretary to inform the ROs concerned through the Lahore High Court’s registrar regarding their appearance on Wednesday.

During the hearing on Tuesday, PML-Q’s counsel Dr Khalid Ranjha produced seven private witnesses before the commission to establish ROs did not issue mandatory notices to the contesting candidates under Section 39 of the Representatives of People’s Act 1976, and that they conducted the consolidation proceedings in the absence of candidates and their election agents.

These seven witnesses, who were PML-Q candidates who lost the elections, claimed before the commission that ROs rigged the polls.

Read: Rigging by ROs: Inquiry commission asks PML-Q to present evidence of rigging

After examination of the candidates, the commission summoned seven judicial officers, who performed their duties as ROs during the 2013 general elections.

The ROs include Qamar Ijaz, Imtiaz Hussain, Muhammad Qasim, Arshad Hussain, Amir Habib and Ijaz Hussain Awan.

The PML-Q last week had requested the commission to summon ROs, who conducted the election in different constituencies of Punjab.

COMMENTS (24)

H Chaudhry | 8 years ago | Reply BTW the highest number of Form 15s that are missing are from Shah M Q seat followed by most PTI won seats in KPK. Hmmmm, definately looking like an organized conspiracy to get Im the Dim defeated in 2013, LoL.
Ranjha | 8 years ago | Reply @H Chaudhry: Mr. Thurgood Marshal, tell me what do you have top say about the missing form 15s? Is that "he said, she said", master of jurisprudence? Which "precedence" will this go against, Abraham Lincoln? Eggheads like you have such low intellect and even lower moral standards that it hurts to think that I share the country with people like you. Complete self important losers!
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ