
IHC Justice Athar Minallah reserved the verdict till May 11 after the convict’s counsel Dr Tariq Hassan and Deputy Attorney General Waqar Rana completed arguments.
The court has constantly been directing the petitioner’s counsel to present any precedent from across the globe when a case has been reopened after it had been adjudicated by the country’s highest court.
Despite several references to different judgments and lengthy arguments citing different sections of law by the petitioner’s counsel, the question remained unanswered.
The issue of maintainability persists in the case as the state counsel once again argued that it was not a ‘contempt case’ and in such cases, the respondents such as the president and the prime minister have ‘blanket immunity’ under Article 248 of the Constitution. He said that the petitioner was indirectly trying to reopen the case, already adjudicated by the Supreme Court.
On Tuesday, the IHC had stayed the execution after terming the FIA inquiry determining Hussain’s age illegal.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 9th, 2015.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ