A senior official of the federal government has revealed to The Express Tribune that the interior ministry has moved an appeal against the IHC’s March 9 judgment, wherein charges of terrorism against Mumtaz Qadri have been omitted.
The IHC’s division bench comprising Justice Noorul Haq N Qureshi and Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui set aside his conviction under section 7 of the ATA but upheld the death sentence under 302 of the PPC. This means that Qadri is guilty of murder but not terrorism.
The IHC has found that none of the prosecution witnesses (barring one), and neither the investigating officer nor the prosecution evidence, suggested that Qadri’s act amounted to an attempt to create panic, intimidate and terrorize the public, or to create a sense of fear and insecurity among the public.
The law officer contends that the federal government has strong reservation over the high court’s findings to set aside the terrorism charges against Qadri, adding that terrorism is itself defined in Anti terrorism Act 1997.
However, the interior ministry on Wednesday moved an application in the apex court, requesting to give seven days time to file a proper appeal along with paper books in this case. Under the Supreme Court’s rule, the appeal should be filed within 30 days. The one month duration ends on April 9.
The federal government also faced embarrassment on Wednesday, when an Advocate on Record namely Safdar Hussain Shah refused to file the interior ministry’s application in this matter because he is against the awardof death penalty to Mumtaz Qadri. Later on, the federal government engaged another AOR namely Sadiq Baloch to file the application. The application for seeking time has been filed in late hours.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 9th, 2015.
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ