Imagined history

The fabrication of history is not new and is not limited to any one country — it is omnipresent


Yaqoob Khan Bangash April 05, 2015
The writer teaches History at Forman Christian College Lahore and tweets at @BangashYK

On the first day of April when people throughout the world pull a trick on one another, my friend Yasir Pirzada showed how we as a nation have been tricked by so-called scholars and experts about history. Writing on Lord Macaulay, Yasir showed how his oft-quoted sinister plan of breaking “the very backbone of this nation, which is her cultural and spiritual heritage” was as fantastic a concoction as Macaulay’s assertion that he had travelled throughout India but had not “seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief”. This quote, Yasir showed through his close investigation, was a complete fabrication. Similarly, Yasir traced the veracity of the claim that India was highly educated when the British came but that the British made us lose our literacy. Through historical research, Yasir showed how this was also a hollow claim.

Yasir’s article came at a very opportune time; just a day earlier I was exhorting my students to always investigate the veracity of claims and so-called facts — without such an investigation, I told them, they should not believe anything to be true. Yasir’s column has quite simply hit the nail on the head, and forces us to re-examine the way we view history. For a lot of people in Pakistan, history is a hobby or at best a general subject. People hardly consider it a science with its own processes, methods and methodology. History in Pakistan is considered everyone’s domain and everyone is an authority on it. Hence when television programme hosts want to get an ‘expert opinion’ on an historical point, they rarely contact a historian — a columnist, a public speaker, or at times just a random chap suffices. Imagine asking a non-specialist to come on a show and give an expert opinion on, say, physics. But wait, its Pakistan.

The fabrication of history is not new and is not limited to any one country — it is omnipresent. However, what differentiates us from other countries is that elsewhere historians are considered experts on the scientific study of history. In other countries, historians stand up and point out such fallacies repeatedly. The above quoted article is the first researched exposition of the topic I have read in Urdu in recent memory. Why don’t more people, especially Urdu columnists, tackle this issue, I wonder.

I attended the Indian History Congress at the end of 2014, where the eminent historian Professor Dr Irfan Habib presented a resolution at its general meeting which read, in part: “The Indian History Congress throughout its existence has been committed to the cause of the scientific method in history and its pursuit free of any sectarian or chauvinistic approaches … The Indian History Congress is confident that all genuine historians would stand by the values of their profession and resist interested distortions of our past.” The resolution was then put to a vote and passed without any dissent — and remember here that the Indian History Congress gets a lot of funding from the government of India.

It is almost unthinkable that any meeting of historians in Pakistan would pass such a resolution, and especially a resolution which clearly criticises the prime minister. This is because historians in Pakistan have given up their discipline to certain ‘experts’ and are too scared to publicly correct distortions. The result of this half-hearted engagement is clear: pseudo-experts dominate the field and create a fantasy-based narrative which they feed to a news and information hungry audience that neither knows about the discipline nor cares to know about it. Every country embellishes its past to foster nationalism. However, what differentiates us is that while other countries might embellish about 15-20 per cent of their history, we try to achieve 80 per cent; where others lie five to 10 per cent of the time, we love to fabricate the whole story. The time has come that we should stop telling blatant lies to our people, and move towards the scientific study of history where facts are investigated and verified and where history is considered a discipline with experts. Our nation has suffered too much at the hands of fabricated history; let us start telling the truth.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 6th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (11)

Rex Minor | 8 years ago | Reply Similarly, Yasir traced the veracity of the claim that India was highly educated when the British came but that the British made us lose our literacy. Through historical research, Yasir showed how this was also a hollow claim. The Professor of hstory should know that Truth or near truth is always with those whose accumalative knowledge is passed on from one family to another and not what the Government allow to tell its people. Yasir need to learn about the colonial ideology which will tell hi that the colonialist be it in the Indian subcontinent or in Afric and beyond robbed the natives not only of their wealth but tradition and culture as well. just a day earlier I was exhorting my students to always investigate the veracity of claims and so-called facts — without such an investigation, I told them, they should not believe anything to be true. Yasir’s column Your students sir do not come to you for advice but to learn history. Tell them that the Indian sub-continent was colonised for more or less two centuries and was robbed of their civilisation, culture and traditional values and ofcourse wealth, which both India and Pakistan leadership have been struggling since independence to regain through the patchy repair work. Rex Minor
Gram Massla | 8 years ago | Reply Most of history is fallacious and concocted, some more so than the others. It is merely a tool for propagandists. Take "Western" history. It begins with Greece and Rome and teaches Europeans that the Greeks began an "autonomous" civilization with very little input from Mesopotamia and Egypt.This has been proven wrong. Martin Bernal, the well known linguist estimates that more than 33% of the words in Greek has Sumerian and Egyptian origins. Indeed the very alphabet that the Greeks use, and that we all use today, originated with the Phoenicians. Most Europeans have no idea what their ancestors were doing at the time of Christ or before. They glibly accept Greece and Rome as "their" history. As Henry Ford right said,"History is bunkum".
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ