Why the date of Shafqat Hussain’s birth matters is because, as documents appear to show, he was 14 at the time of the offence, then as a minor he should not have been sentenced to death. Why it has taken so many years for the material facts to emerge, and apparently so conclusively, is something of a mystery. His family says that his admission of guilt was obtained after days of torture by the police — which is entirely possible as the police nationwide routinely torture suspects in their custody.
Furthermore, Shafqat Hussain reportedly suffers from a learning disability that may also impinge upon any finding of guilt. Given the endemic imperfections of the judicial system and the propensity of the police to beat their detainees into admissions of guilt, whether or not they are in fact guilty, this conviction must be seen as unsound. The capital nature of the offence makes the burden of proof even heavier. The distance of time and a myriad confusions all contribute to profound doubt, a doubt that must be absent when a life is at stake.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 20th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (1)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ