Primacy of primary level education

If teachers cannot be assured that their basic needs will be met at work, they will not opt to join this profession

Tariq Mahmud March 04, 2015
The writer is an author, a public policy analyst and a former federal secretary. He teaches at the Lahore University of Management Sciences

The excellence achieved by a nation depends on the quality of human resource it is endowed with. This crucial element not only produces a professionally sturdy workforce for multivariate tasks, but can also produce a vision that turns challenges into opportunities. In this whole process, education provides an intimate connect between the quality of human resource and the development path of any country. Despite loud proclamations, education has continued to occupy a low priority for successive governments in Pakistan, especially at the primary level although there have been investments made in higher education in the form of the Higher Education Commission. When it comes to addressing the woes of the education sector, governments have been mostly inclined towards providing brick and mortar buildings for schools and preferring projects with higher visibility in short gestation periods. Education, apart from being a long-drawn learning process, also amounts to behavioural therapy, which requires consistent investment and patience for results. What we see instead is poor resource commitment to this key area. Around 45.3 per cent of the adult population is still illiterate according to 2011 Unesco figures. A major chunk of the resources allocated to the education sector go towards tertiary education to the disadvantage of primary and elementary education.

Our public sector schooling is in a dismal state and needs a complete overhaul. According to a World Bank publication, Pakistan: An Evaluation of the World Bank’s Assistance, in the late 1990s, Punjab was mired in the problem of ‘ghost’ schools with around 1,600 such schools in the province. Other surveys indicated that this number was possibly higher. Sindh is now afflicted with at least 30,000 ‘ghost’ teachers according to a host of recent reliable media reports. This is not only a management failure but a sad commentary on the system of monitoring and inspection. The situation calls for a major shake-up, which will require a visionary approach. Primary-level schooling has a crucial role to play in the development of a child’s mind. Because of this, focus must shift to teachers and the quality of teaching and learning provided. Improving the quality of teaching has to be a complete package, which should include improvements in the recruitment system, pre-service training and constant up-gradation of the teachers’ skill mix. There are around 25 million out-of-school children in the country. Teachers should be made aware of this stark reality at the time of recruitment. We need to devise a holistic plan that focuses on expanding enrolment, plugging the drop-out rate and link it with a system of incentives and reprimands that monitors the performance of teachers.

There is a need for intervention in the existing recruitment procedure that is in vogue in many parts of the country. In Punjab, recruitment to all supervisory positions has been entrusted to the public service commission, which has neutralised political influence and added to the credibility of the selection process. Replicating this countrywide may seem like a tall order, keeping in view the enormous size of the education departments in the other provinces. The task can be assigned to a credible, independent testing authority. Primary school teachers, once in place, should be exposed to regular in-service training, which should be linked to a well-defined career path like other streams of the civil service. A comprehensive recruitment policy that encompasses the above-mentioned steps, as well as other areas including improving teaching standards, providing competitive compensation etc. is the need of the hour.

When it comes to addressing other missing links that hamper the recruitment of good quality teachers, I believe that provincial bureaucracies should have no role whatsoever in this regard. During my stint in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, I visited a girls’ school in a remote area in upper Dir. The school had all the basic facilities, yet there was still demand for an additional room for outstation female teachers who had to commute daily from far off places. Such seemingly small details, in the long run, do hinder the recruitment of good quality teachers. If teachers cannot be assured that their basic needs will be met at work, they will not opt to join this profession.
Apart from interventions in recruitment procedures, a new paradigm that re-assesses training needs of teachers is also needed. Other than content knowledge, the manner in how instructions are imparted (pedagogy) is as important and needs special emphasis. Schoolchildren need an interactive mode of learning, more so at the primary level. Teachers should be well aware that their main task is to promote self-esteem and the cognitive integration of students, which can enhance their span of attention and thought process. Training modules for teachers need to be completely revisited. Apart from being grounded in specialty, teachers require behavioural skills to inculcate self-discipline, team spirit, tolerance and fraternity. In this regard, perhaps, the National Professional Standards for Teachers developed in 2009 by the education ministry could be implemented to improve the quality of teaching and learning in schools.

This will not only help improve learning outcomes but also help train nascent minds on meaningful and constructive lines. A two-year training module should be followed along with an upgraded salary regime for primary level teachers.

Education, as an engine of growth, needs fair treatment. We need to align our priorities afresh and make appropriate allocations for primary level education and attach a price tag to public sector higher education. Why should the taxpayer subsidise education of those who often have the ability to pay for it? Provisions should only be made for the deserving through lateral transfers but the main focus of public sector spending in education should be at the primary level if we want to bring positive reforms to the country’s education sector.

Published in The Express Tribune, March  5th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.


anwar | 6 years ago | Reply Rightly pointed out, primary education in the country is such a huge challenge that needs to be tackled at war footing..We need to mobilize all possible resources in this regard including the untapped source of the educated senior citizens who may be counted in millions and most of whom will be happy to offer their services voluntarily or with little remuneration.It will be a win win position as they seniors will get an opportunity to get busy too.
Salim Jan | 6 years ago | Reply The primary education is the foundation/edifice on which the pyramid of education is built.The writer has rightly pointed out the multifarious problems which plague the primary education in Pakistan.One main problem confronting primary schools in tribal areas is the lack of teaching staff.There are only two or three teachers in a school for hundred of students as per the outdated policy of the government.As for as the pedagogical trainings are concerned,it is a satisfying fact that nowadays well-qualified teachers are recruited in primary schools but still periodical refresher courses need to be arranged during vacations.As most of the teachers get professional education,I,e.PST,C.T,B.Ed etc.from Allama Iqbal Open University,it can play a big role in the improvement of teaching techniques of the teachers by employing experienced and qualified tutors and trainers.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read