Need to reassess past ideologies: Thapar

Says colonial readings should be viewed for what they gave birth too.


Rameez Khan February 20, 2015
The short attention span of Lahoris spotlighted.

LAHORE: An eminent Indian scholar and historian said ideologies that were intended to encourage the creation of nation states in the subcontinent now need to be reassessed.

Romila Thapar made the remark while speaking on the topic ‘The Past and Present’ at the three-day Lahore Literature Festival, which started on Friday. She said that despite passage of several years colonial stereotype still colours our perceptions of who we are, what we were and where we are headed.

Thapar insisted that the colonial readings should be viewed for what they gave birth to, adding that they need to be replaced by nurturing sensitivity as to how we listen to the dialogue between the past and the present. She said it was important to determine the authenticity of the very past that has and is shaping our society. Connecting the dots, she explained how history was carved out in pre-colonial era to deepen the division between Hindus and Muslims.

The Indian historian said we take the version of narration at face value and ignore the intensive investigation that should always be crucial to a statement from the past.

Thapar, during her address, said that a Scottish historian James Mill concocted the theory of divide in the subcontinent.

Referring to the image presented in the colonial era of Somnath temple, she said colonial writings overall projected it as the cause of hostility between Hindus and Muslims.

She said in a successful attempt to sow hatred between Muslims and Hindus, Lord Ellenborough during his address to the House of Commons in 1843 talked about bringing back the gates of Somnath temple from Ghazni, which he claimed were stolen during one of the raids of Mehmood Ghaznavi.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 21st, 2015.

COMMENTS (3)

A Peshawary | 9 years ago | Reply History is rewriting itself as it always does. Not to worry; history is like a river flowing down its course irrespective of times; even if a dam is built to divert a river it finds a new course to flow on its own. The diversion may occur but the history will find its way into the life of people. Heartiest gratitude to ET for bringing such a lively literary discussion from high profile literates to the common-man, splendid journalistic work. A Peshawary
J.K.Sharma | 9 years ago | Reply Before partition in 1947,India ,Pakistan and Bangladesh were one,that is ,they are born of the same mother.For thousands of years they were together. Most of citizens in these three countries were originally Hindus ,they were converted to Muslims during Mughal rule.they were converted to Christianity during British rule.After partition there has been enimity due to many reasons ,including Kashmir.Thei Indians ,the Pakistanis and the Bangladeshis looks same in all respects like brothers and sisters ..But I do not understand as to why the Pakistanis she them different from Indians .They try to show them similar to the citizens of Saudi arabia ,Turkey and other Arab countries . Even they have changed or rewritten their history .I request your newspaper to kindly enlighten me of this reason .I shall be grateful to you.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ