"My godfather Modi Ji's development initiatives make me confident that I will win," Singh said, referring to India's new BJP prime minister while out canvassing in the town of Tral last Thursday.
Just hours later, three suspected alleged rebels were shot dead in a stark reminder of the tensions in the picturesque Himalayan region.
About a dozen rebel groups have been fighting Indian forces since 1989 for Kashmir's independence or for its merger with Pakistan. Tens of thousands of people, mostly civilians, have died in the violence.
So the idea of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's BJP taking even a share of power in Kashmir would have been unthinkable only a few months ago.
But Modi's landslide May general election win and a meltdown in support for the incumbent chief minister after deadly floods in September have given the BJP hope of a breakthrough. Separatists have called for boycott of the vote, a move that could play to the BJP's advantage.
Voting begins in the five-phase election on Tuesday, with results due on December 23.
Analysts say the BJP is almost certain to fall short of an outright majority in the 87-member assembly.
But they also say it has drawn up a strategy of military precision to mop up in the Hindu majority Jammu area, and then cut a deal with one of the smaller Muslim parties to become the lead player in a coalition.
"Jammu is like a launching pad," said Mehmoodur Rashid, an analyst based in the main city Srinagar.
The BJP battleplan is "to sweep Jammu, and then cobble together some kind of a loose coalition with individual winners in Kashmir," he added.
Speculation is rife that the BJP will link up with the small People's Conference, a formerly pro-separatist party which now argues that economic growth is the best way of improving the lives of Kashmiris.
Its leader Sajjad Lone met Modi this month in Delhi, telling reporters he had felt "respected and humbled" by the talks.
The BJP is even fielding 32 Muslims candidates in the 70 seats it is contesting, including 25 in the restive Kashmir Valley.
The party won 11 seats in the last elections in 2008, its best ever performance.
The BJP is enjoying a honeymoon period after Modi's victory over the previously ruling Congress party, winning a string of state elections since May.
Singh, a member of Kashmir's small Sikh population, hopes to persuade voters that Modi's party is best placed to improve their livelihood by pointing to green shoots of recovery at national level.
Modi has made five visits to the state as premier, including during Divali last month when he promised more flood relief.
"We in the BJP consider Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh as extremely close to our hearts," Interior Minister Rajnath Singh said at a rally last week.
One handicap is the BJP's long-standing pledge to scrap a constitutional provision known as Article 370, which allows Kashmir to make its own laws.
Even one of its candidates in Srinagar, Hina Bhat, recently said she would "pick up a gun" if the article was removed.
While talk of scrapping the article plays well at a general election, the leadership has been more circumspect while campaigning in the state.
"Article 370 is a national issue for us and there should be an extensive debate over its utility," Rajnath Singh said.
While there is anger over the Modi government's response to the September flooding, which killed around 200 people, most of the ire has been directed towards Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and his ruling National Conference party.
Thousands of residents are still homeless as winter sets in. Business leaders have put the total losses from the floods at around $17 billion.
Abdullah has admitted his administration was overwhelmed by the scale of the floods - the worst in nearly a century.
He says he is best placed to defend the state's special status, accusing the BJP of "talking in different voices".
"In Jammu, they talk about abrogating Article 370 and in the Valley they say that if people want, it will remain," he told reporters.
Pundits are predicting a major fall in his centre-left party's support.
Many commentators have said the real contest this time would be between the BJP and the People's Democratic Party which advocates "self-rule".
The separatist boycott of the polls suffered its first setback in 2008 elections, when turnout crossed 60 percent.
Tral has a history of low turnout and few voters voiced support for the BJP - although Ghulam Rasool, who lives near the candidate Singh, said he would consider voting for the BJP as "he has been good a neighbour".
Bashir Ahmed Wani, whose son is one of Kashmir's most wanted militants, said he wouldn't vote out of principle, but acknowledged that could help the BJP.
"Many people may end up voting for the PDP even if they support a boycott as the fear of the BJP winning is worse," he said.
COMMENTS (33)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@bahadur khan: And then India and Pakistan fought for almost a year without anyone winning or gaining any substantial territory.
Sometimes we forget, that in period 1947 October onwards, In India there was nothing, There was no army. no defence, no map. no plane. One gallant pilot managed to land somewhere near Srinagar. By that time the mujahids had occupied whatever they could, All India could do was put marking on the ground called LOC, Till 1955 there was no money to even put a wooden fence on border.
@Bewildered : And? So not taking solemn oath makes them defacto representative of Kashmir, while taking part in elections (nearly 60% voting participates), and winning doesn't. Still searching for any logic in your arguments. Regarding irregularities, even independent observers agrees that Indian election are by far well managed and administered.
its so funny that a country where so called "Azad Kashmir" doesn't have any rights, gives lessons in morality to its brethren.
Here is whats happening in other kashmir (that too endorsed by Pakistani constitution) :
"Under Azad Kashmir’s constitution, which Pakistan enforced in 1974, election candidates are “prescreened” to ensure that only those who support Kashmir’s union with Pakistan can contest elections. Anyone who wants to take part in public life in Azad Kashmir has to sign a pledge of loyalty to Pakistan, while anyone who publicly supports or peacefully works for an independent Kashmir faces persecution."
@Pk_Paris: @Sneha:
"NO one can stop Separatist to contest election hence your logic of carefully selecting candidates is totally wrong."
In order to take part in elections it is a mandatory requirement to take solemn oath under Indian constitution which declares J&K as part of India, a condition which is unacceptable to Kashmiris. Regarding details of elections rigging and manipulations follow the link in my previous comment.
@GS@Y: You don't like it then don't visit the ET website. May be you should go to Urdu version of the website. You would not find Indians there.
@pakistani: Ever bothered to have a serious look in the mirror lately ? You are on net, have you bothered to read reports or news items from other parts of the world, as to the general opinion of Pakistan and its society ? The answer lies there, if one can actually face it and deal with it, otherwise remain in that delusional cocoon of self comfort with multiple internal problems ranging from basic security, law/order, debts, energy crises .......... The list is BIG !
@Bewildered: you make a stupid statement when you write that Indian elections are manipulated. Indian elections are always fair and even those who lose have never made the accusation that elections have been manipulated. India is not Pakistan.
@GS@Y:
"ET really needs some kind of a policy about Indian trolls on its message boards. Enough with the hateful right-wing propagandists from across the border."
ET can't do diddly squat. ET survives on Indians visiting here.
I don't think you understand. Right on this page is the ad of airasia.com. ET needs Indian companies to advertise on their website for money.
If Indians aren't allowed to comment, Indians won't visit the site. If Indians don't visit, how will ET generate ad revenue? Let's be honest, the number of Pakistanis visiting an English daily, that too on the internet is far fewer compared to the number of Indians.
@dude: take a chill pill dude. failed state?? what has this to do with this story. grow up
indian trolls on the roll...
ET really needs some kind of a policy about Indian trolls on its message boards. Enough with the hateful right-wing propagandists from across the border.
Does Pakistan really think that Kashmir's independence is possible?? it is not....by sponsoring militancy in kashmir, pakistan is best making Indian forces occupied in a battle. That's it. India is far too strong in this age and century to give up on Kashmir. Pakistan's military strength cannot over-power India in a battle to whisk kashmir away, if there is to be one. The solution of making trade between the 2 kashmirs is however possible to achieve, irrespective of article 370 or not.
If We don't let India rule Kashmir then our Shia-Sunni or TTP violence will never end. This violence is an made as an example by the Indian Govt to shows to the Kashmiri Shias to vote for BJP. And same is the reason to promote Shia-Sunni violence, to Break Up Pak further.
@Ishan: Oh, that's why so many violent episodes were inflicted on Pak Shias.... To make an example for Kashmir Shias to go against separatists demand for freedom of Kashmir or merger with Pakistan. Now I see why there is no end to Shia-Sunni violence in Pakistan, specially in Kashmir Valley.
@Bewildered, You fall in the category of people who wish to keep Kashmir issue boiling rather than finding a solution to common Kashmiri.
NO one can stop Separatist to contest election hence your logic of carefully selecting candidates is totally wrong. Last election turn out was more than 60% so it is clear indication that more than 60% do not support separatist, which is turn to Pakistan.
Root cause of violence in Kashmir is infiltration of terrorist from Pakistan side. Now Only solution to Kashmir, let Pakistan just concentrate on internal issues & stop infiltration, This will give way to reduction in Indian military presence & of course better development in Indian part of Kashmir. And still Kasmiries want to be independent or to be with Pakistan, let them do it with policy of non-violence.
@Bewildered: Are elections is Pakistan fair? If yes then what is Imran Khan doing with these Dharnas. Why dont you worry about them which is directly related to your life.
@Bewildered: Sajjad lone was a separatist. He has joined mainstream just like many other separatist and now contexts election from past 2 elections. So this scrutinising and forbidding is baseless. Any body can stand election if he believes in constitution and fights for rights and justice of its people. His past record of being seperatist doesn't matter unless there is proven criminal record where he is found guilty by court. "Potential threat to illegal occupation" there is no "occupation" or "illegality" when india holds "legal rights" over jk State. jk king had signed agreement with india not pakistan. Infact it's you who don't have legality over your side and hold it. As far as rigging. We had ballot paper system long time back. After evms our election has become transparent and fair. No party does dharna to context the result.Whole world applauds it for its fairness and comes to learn from us. We have many checks and balances, seals at every level, each candidates is present to scrutinise the procedure if at all cheating is happening. And even if after all that he doubts he can print the list of votes from the manchine on the spot to know if verdicts match. So no rigging. Plus there are UN people too.
@ Bewildered
Pure ranting...
@Pk_Paris:
Contesting elections requires to solemnly take oath to protect the Indian constitution which declares J&K as an integral part of India which Kashmiris do not accept. Moreover, India carefully scrutinizes the candidates and forbid persons contesting election who could potentially be a threat to its illegal occupation. Here is a brief history of election rigging/manipulations in J&K as dug out by a researcher Michael Colodner.
@Ahmed Khan: Article 370 was not a part of the original constitution, hence cannot be a part of the basic structure of the constitution. Moreover, based on Keshavnanda case whether an article is part of the basic structure could be defined only by the supreme court. Abrogation of 370 requires the resolution to be passed in J&K assembly by a special majority ( two third of those voting and more than 50% of strength of the house ) and then to be ratified by the National parliament by a simple majority.
@Neo: Modi is future of India & kashmir. +++++++++++++++++++++++++ If I may make a small modification.
@Bewildered: Modi and his party (RSS) is a wolf in sheep’s skin
Better to have wolf, than the Hyenas lurking as separatists, who are even scared to contest in the election ! They know the reality on ground, that they will loose their deposits, let alone win any seats.
@Bewildered: Your logic makes pakistani an occupier.
Modi govt's quick response to the floods in Kashmir and immediate sanctioning of Rs.10 Billion (1000 crore) for relief made Modi very popular. On the contrary, people saw how delays in response from Congress ally NC to the floods created a hatred for the current CM,Abdullah. As far as Art 370 is concerned its the part of basic structure of Constitution that can not be removed.
More than 60% of jk state voted in 2008. When bjp was not even the factor. Congress,PDP was.This time it will go more up just like ready of the country. People want change and good governance in the country. In Loksabha elections 2014 Jammu and Kashmir state saw voter turner out over 50%, Mumbai - 51% Bangalore-53%. So where does the question of space for separatism arise? With high turnout. By same logic shouldn't mumbai and Bangalore too be in separatist list? Or even America. As 2014 voter turnout there was only 36.4%. People have always voted and "elected their leaders" to represent their state ignoring fringe separatists elements in jk.
Modi is future of kashmir.
to eradicate article 370 is the motive behind and covertion of LOC into international boundary
Modi and his party (RSS) is a wolf in sheep's skin (development) trying to lure naive and poor Kashmiris and has plans to win by hook or crook as India has always done by manipulating elections since 1950s. However, this time the big difference is to rule the Kashmir directly instead of using stooges and occupy their lands permanently as Israelis did with Palestinians.
faricated stories work in pakistan only. that is why its top failed country. in J&K, BJP will come into power directly or indirectly(with alliance), lets see what pakis can do. recent firing from paki side, drama in UN all are just because of these kind of upcomings.
Seperatist & Pakistan think that Sepertist truly represent Kashmir then let them contest these elections & win with majority. But Obiviously seperatist will boycott these election because they know they will suffer heavy loss. May be loss of deposit
BJP will win all seats in Jammu, Shia votes in Kashmir. Adding few other seats which seems quite possible, BJP will form govt in J&K and then, nobody would be able to stop END OF ARTICLE 370 And rehabilitation of Kashmiri Pandits.
Anything good for people , should be welcome !
If separatist & Pakistan really think of well being of common Kashmiri then they will support these elections & will not create any issue. Let turn out & election result speak what a common Kashmiri really wants