Lingering dispute: Kashmiri leaders are not separatists, says FO

Rejects Indian minister’s call for Pakistan to choose between New Delhi and Kashmiris


Our Correspondent November 07, 2014
Lingering dispute: Kashmiri leaders are not separatists, says FO

ISLAMABAD:


The foreign office on Thursday rejected a recent Indian statement calling on Islamabad to make a “conscious choice” on deciding whether it wanted to negotiate with New Delhi or with Kashmiri leaders.


Reacting to remarks by Indian Defence Minister Arun Jaitley, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tasnim Aslam said on Thursday that Pakistan would not accept preconditions for the resumption of the stalled bilateral dialogue.

Jaitley, who is also India’s finance minister, had said that a new “red line” has to be drawn in Pakistan to reconsider who they want to speak to. “Do they want to speak to the Government of India or do they want to speak to those who want to break India? Unless Pakistan makes a conscious choice, a dialogue with Pakistan will not be possible.”

Reiterating the internationally recognised status of Kashmir as a disputed territory, the foreign office spokesperson emphasised that Kashmiri leaders are not separatists, but instead representatives of an occupied people who were fighting for their right to self-determination.

“We do not accept any conditionality. Kashmiris are not Indian separatists. They are people in occupied territory struggling for their right to self-determination that has been recognised by United Nations resolutions. Pakistan is a party to the dispute. So this contention is not acceptable,” she contended.

Aslam added, “As we have been stating, the dialogue between Pakistan and India is not a favour that one country does to the other. Dialogue between Pakistan and India is a necessity for peace in this region so that South Asia focuses on economic development and welfare of its people.”

India had called off foreign secretary level talks in August citing the Pakistani High Commissioner’s meeting with Kashmiri leaders as reason for the cancellation.

Since then, relations between the two nuclear-armed neighbours hit a new low as a result of ongoing tensions along the Line of Control and Working Boundary.

At least 21 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in the cross fire since the skirmishes started in early October.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 7th, 2014.

COMMENTS (10)

Ranjith | 10 years ago | Reply

@Hammad Mian: This IIS not claims kind of economic dispute to go to courts and settling it. Its a something concerned with the nation so as I believe Kashmir will and shall be a integral part of India I find no necessity of dialouges with a rogue nation like Pakistan who can't even govern their North western tribal parts speaking on the issue of Kashmir is annoying... First Pakistan should take care of its own country rather than interfere in the internal affairs of another nation.

sam | 10 years ago | Reply

To all Pakistani who boast of Kashmir resolution should read this! The UN resolution on kashmir is not binding under chapter VI

Resolution was passed by United Nations Security Council under chapter VI of UN Charter.[1] Resolutions passed under Chapter VI of UN charter are considered non binding and have no mandatory enforceability as opposed to the resolutions passed under Chapter VII.[2][3][4]

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ