While Pakistan has been exhorting for immediate parleys to be held between India and Pakistan and for a cessation of firing on the LoC, India seems to be in no mood to comply. The reason for that is not difficult to understand. After Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the US, hardliners in the Indian government are ranting day in and day out about adopting a ‘boli nahi, goli’ (bullets, not talk) approach. In the US, Modi was warmly received by President Barack Obama. It was the same US, which had denied Modi a visa for a decade for his alleged complicity in the Gujarat pogrom. This time, however, Modi enamoured his host and was able to extract a Pakistan-specific joint statement that put Pakistan on the spot for militancy and harbouring infrastructure that enables militant activities. The two leaders, in their expediency, glossed over the fact that the Pakistan Army was fighting a decisive war against militants. Apart from the U S elixir, the Chinese president’s visit to India — other than billion-dollar deals — brought in symbolic dividends, with the Chinese president landing in Ahmedabad, capital of Modi's home state, instead of in New Delhi. Japan has also extended record economic assistance and will join India as a partner in naval exercises in the Indian Ocean.
Discerning minds should not, however, forget that ‘Rising India', at the same time, is headed by a person in Narendra Modi , who despite receiving huge support from corporate India, represents a mind nurtured deeply in the philosophy of the RSS. This right wing, Hindu revivalist conglomerate does present a fairly broad spectrum of ideas and followers so it is too early to predict where Modi figures on the RSS continuum. At one end, there is a stream that spearheaded the demolition of the Babri Mosque, which caused one of the worst communal riots since independence. The same breed was responsible for the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. The other stream was represented by people like the level-headed and suave Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who could even find a bond with the Jamaat-e-Islami if the situation demanded it. Only time will tell which stream Modi will end up following.
Conflagration on the LoC may be viewed from yet another perspective as a testing ground for Pakistan's resolve and patience. The inner core of the Modi government has made its intent clear, taking a shot at amending Article 370 of the Indian Constitution that accords special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. This provision protects the demographic character of the occupied state. It is the only state, which also has its own constitution protecting its special status, giving the right of permanent residence and ownership to Kashmiris only and bars Indians having domiciles of other states from enjoying these rights. Any change to that effect not only requires an amendment in the Indian Constitution, but also requires the concurrence of the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly by a two-third majority.
The BJP is vying for making a deep ingress into the state assembly through state elections. The ultimate objective of this will be to tinker with the constitutional mechanism that exists between the state and the union and change its demographic profile, not realising that this may lead to another intifada that may engulf the whole state in bloody violence. The constitutional provision of allowing only Kashmiris to be permanent residents has a history of nearly 100 years now. In the 1920s, the maharaja of the state linked this special status with ancestral lineage and this right was secured after independence through the instrument of accession signed in 1947. This was sensibly protected by the framers of the Indian Constitution. Such a special status is not an alien concept even in modern times and we can see its application in Hong Kong and Macau.
Rising and persistent escalation on the LoC will land India in the same bind in which Pakistan was sucked into in the 1990s when the philosophy of ‘bleeding India to the last drop’ was hyped. In the end, what we got was a pulverised society at home and excessive militarisation of the Valley by Indian troops. The BJP leadership minces no words about its stance on Article 370. As a sequel to that, it wishes to degrade Pakistan's capability to react to this. The point being missed is that here are two nuclear powers and either side can trip, setting the stage for the first and the last nuclear war on the planet, which could result in the living envying the dead. ‘Teaching Pakistan a lesson’ is a puerile way of approaching a complex problem. Let diplomacy be given a chance. There are far more pressing problems to tackle than pounding hapless civilians at the LoC.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 4th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (48)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@observer: Extremely sorry about that. Will surely keep that in mind.
@manjunath naik:
While I agree with what you have said, have you ever heard of something called "paragraph" to make your writing more readable and easy on the eye?
Enough is enough is the foreword now in India. Nuclear Weapons are of no consequence as far as India is concerned as the 'no first use' stands. This 'no first use' doctrine itself is enough to signal the war mongers that Nuclear weapon is just a showcased weapon for global reach in terms of earlier getting into the UN Security Council etc. Pakistan is well known to multiply its nuclear weapons strategy which in reality is a nonstarter. It is exactly this policy which has warned the whole world to watch Pakistan closely. Since the stockpile has gone beyond the magic 100 number, war blackmail has increased from the Pakistani side. They forget that every war it initiated by deceit and back stabbing was lost. The two nation theory is split up right in the middle to make it three nation theory now. The world has watched how the demography within Pakistan and India have changed. Today we have an addition of 2.5 million Muslims (since Independence) happily staying in India and well embroidered in the main stream. On the contrary the Hindus in Pakistan have dwindled from about 10 Million to less than a Million today. Pakistan must be tried for genocide for this. With all this perils seen in the our neighborhood, India actually saved the world with the creation of Bangladesh (Hostilities against non Muslims by Pakistan in East Pakistan is well documented). Let me remind everyone Pakistan precipitated the War a few weeks after independence by launching tribal lashkar (militia) from Waziristan, in an effort to secure Kashmir. The inconclusive result of the war still affects the geopolitics of both countries. Just waiting for a while before things could settle down would have sorted the issue long back. Today it is a stalemate which the world will not even look at. Pakistan has shot itself in the foot one too many times and the result is there for everyone to see.
@ToraBora: Rediff must not entertain such idiotic writing when Mr modi is pm Muslims are feeling much better then ever before.nuclear blackmail has lost its steam if pak ever tried one within second it will vanish from world map by Indian retaliation Minorities in Pakistan are burnt alive yesterday news says a Christian couple was burnt.Some UN agency or human right activist must find out that where all minorities vanished from pak and what happened to them.
@Zeeshan Ashraf: do agree your sympathies are with pakistan. In an age where civil service toppers are from j&k. There are a lot of people who are caught up in the philosophy of do nothing because terrorists from across border will send them up. There are many engineering colleges for women who are taking up software jobs. Railway line has come to qazi gund. In 10 years Srinagar (avantipur) will be connected to Chandigarh. There can be economic migration from Pok to rest. Like east Germany west Germany. Islam cannot be the glue for holding back economic and educational awareness in people.
@ all u Hindus IOK is an OCCUPIED area held by the Indian army by force thats why we Pakistanis r concerned about article 370 of Indian constitution as it is to deal with the kashmir.kashmir is not a part of India as it is being held by force that is the reason u have article 370 and v dont have such kind of article in our constitution for AJK. The people of AJK r happily living with pakistan. Can u say the same for the people of IOK..yes u can ...bcoz u r liars.. U can't see the atrocities done by the Indian army in the valley.. U don't see the protest of kashmiris against indian occupation in London and elsewhere in the world If u r so sure about the kashmiris happily living in ur OCCUPIED area then y u r reluctant to held a plebiscite acc. To the UN resolutions???
@osama lone: "I have no doubt that there will be a big war on the sub-continent if Modi is successful in removing article 370."
So, Pakistan is gonna attack India if the latter revokes Article 370 ?
"What right does India have to turn native inhabitants “red indians” in their own land? No justification can be given."
Ask me, I can give u all the justifications u need ...
@Hassan: wrote on this matter it did not get published that is why you Pakistani's do not know. You are fed what you need to hear. The Constitution has a temporary amendment and on your side there is something similar. Also the Shimla accord is binding and the UNSC has no say in it, after the 1971 defeat Pakistan signed away the resolution. If you Muslims want lands where you are the Majority then Israel has the right to exist as well, also Lebanon should be partitioned, etc. That goes for the majority Buddhist and Hindu areas in Bangladesh, where they are now being forced to give up their faith or are persecuted. You think as Pakistani's you are doing your faith a favour by doing this but you are not the world over nations are now wary of Muslims and each attack only make it worst for Muslims. A time is coming where the world will turn against you totally, it is happening. Pakistan (occupied India), will take a big hit.
On the other hand, the point being missed by the writer is that nuclear weapons have not helped Pakistan go even half a step towards its inflated ambitions. He should ask himself 1. Why Pakistan retreaded from Kargil in spite of its nukes. 2. What advantage it gets today from nukes when India freely bombards its territory. 3. What advantage it hopes to get tomorrow from nukes against a developed Afghanistan. So far, all that Pakistan's nukes have produced is facile chatter.
@Hassan: But do not you agree that the Muslim-dominated valley must be given to Pakistan
@Asim Mahmood: Removal article 370 is India's internal affair. No one in India needs any body else's opinion. There is already a place worse then Gaza, it's called Balochistan and POK. @Mohammed: Bring it on.
stop writing rubbish and instead preach your country to become civilized nation which is currently in the list to rogue nations,Art 370 is part of Indian constitution and it can be removed any time by Indian Parliament , why Pakistan is worried about a Art of Indian Constitution. And threatening a peaceful country with nuclear weapons is not the act of a civilized nation, u must know that India has no first use policy for nuclear weapon and it shows that India is a civilized nation also it is very easy to follow no first use policy and Pakistan has a first use policy which is very difficult to follow in todays world .On the economic front your country is on ventilator of international aid and IMF/world bank loans which is being used to pay salaries to your forces and purchase ammunition and wage low intensity and proxy wars against India which world has been knowing since long but acknowledging it openly so no one in the world is going to support Pakistan blabbers
While it is "noble" to talk about Indians planning to change Article 370, will the author also condemn Pakistan's 1974 abrogation and violation of the "State Subject Rule" of Gilgit-Baltistan that, similar to Indian Article 370, prohibited non-Kashmiris from settling down or owning property in GB?
Read:
http://skardu.blogspot.com/2014/07/gilgit-baltistan-state-subject-rule.html
http://www.sharnoffsglobalviews.com/the-institute-for-gilgit-baltistan-studies/
https://www.facebook.com/GilgitBaltistanUnitedMovement
The real fear Pakistan has that repealing article 370 will bring unprecedented peace, prosperity, and development in India's Kashmir which will lead to so-called Azad Kashmir breaking away from Pakistan's control and joining India and Indian Held Kashmir.
@Np: You are 100% right, the removal of article 370 would " increase the market value of land owned by Kashmiris with more buyers" thus creating another " Gaza " high on the mountains. Let us " diplomacy be given a chance " without indulging in somersaults.
@ToraBora: Maybe the cowardly hindus want to test the water. Don't worry you will be given an appropriate response.
D-uh ... Oh dear @author, you say "...in the 1990s when the philosophy of ‘bleeding India to the last drop’ was hyped. ..." --- Excuse Me! Were not people like yourself (pretty much the whole crew in Pakistan) falling over each other DENYING such a thing as "bleeding India blah blah blah" even existed...? What are we to presume now - that chaps like you are saints, or comedians...?
@K. Selvam: Not only shops, lots of Kashmiri's work in both public and private enterprises across the country.
@Hassan: Does Pakistan have the equivalent of article 370? No? Why then are you concerned aout India? Please read the comment by @Animal Farm. It makes it absolutely clear why this article needs to go. Also if you cannot see the barrier that article 370 is to progress and prosperity in Kashmir by preventing Indian industrialists from building factories in Kashmir which can provide employment to local youth, by increasing market value of land owned by Kashmiris with more buyers - then your are no well wisher of Kashmiris.,
In any case, the article can be removed if and only if both natuonal parliament and J&K assembly vote for it. If they do, Pakistan has no say in it.
@Rangoonwala: Making stuff up?Even Modi's opponents have not linked him with the Babri incident.
@osama lone: How would that make you a "red Indian"? The article is clearly discriminatory in nature and is against Kashmiri women whose right to property it clearly curtails.
The BJP in India is pressing for removal of article 370 not for allowing other settlers in India to settle in kashmir, or buy lands there, but for allowing investments into J&K which are prohibited under article 370. India's another sate, In Himachal Pradesh, a state which is integrated with India and it's situation is unlike the one in J&K, indian citizens not having a domicile of himachal pradesh cannot buy land there. So the argument by the author is poorly researched.
@osama lone: Very funny indeed. The name of the state is derived from an Indian Saint well before the advent of Islam. So all Kashmiri's were Hindus as were Pakistani's. Attempting to change this fact shows how desperate you are. Further, did you hear the failed attempt to get the British Parliament to support Pakistan? The closing part of the session, the speakers said that Kashmir can not be part of Pakistan, in fact there are a lot of non-Muslims who out number Muslims in the state who are Kashmiri and were forced out of the state by Muslims. Also that Pakistani Occupied Kashmir hardly offers freedoms to Kashmiri's for self determination. The world is well aware of the facts and the ongoing proxy war Pakistan is involved in. Carry on in the same vein and there will be no Pakistan left.
What has an article in the Indian Constitution have to do with Pakistan. It is purely a matter of India's concern, not pakistan's. Pakistan can make their hudood ordinances and rules, but you don't have to be concerned with something that is India's first and secondly, J&K&Ladakh's concern. Mind your own business sir.
Also why link a change in consitution to a nuclear war. It speaks of your mindset and belligerent attitude. @ET,please publish
India is playing with fire by trying to abolish Article 370.I have no doubt that there will be a big war on the sub-continent if Modi is successful in removing article 370. What right does India have to turn native inhabitants "red indians" in their own land? No justification can be given.
Indian readers reaction seems out of proportion with a deep sense of hurt . The counter argument is that abrogation of the well protected Article will pave the way for greater investments and job opportunities to Kashmiri . The simple question is as what stops the BJP from that objective . The Indian constitution clearly lays down area restricted to the union , namely , foreign affairs , defence , communication etc , for intervention in other area including promotion of investment setting up of industries all that is required is concurrence of J&k state Assembly .The question is that why doesn't the new government adhere to that course! The reason is obvious at Modi Sarkar wishes to bend the Kashmiris backward once for all . Any such move is fraught with consequences which the government at this moment is not prepared to care about . BJPs move would certainly formalise further division of the state with Jammu and Ladakh region palpably going with the government and Muslim dominated valley being further radicalised while giving a new twist to India Pakistan relations .
@jssidhoo: dude they don't even have a working constitution...and you are asking about article....they don't even know what exactaly constitution clause and articles are....
LOL, what an article. For a country that hid Osma Bin Ladin and has constantly lied, no one believes you as a nation and this article is a product of that. I know you will never publish this but who cares. The truth is the truth.
@working boundary again: Can somebody please tell me what a working boundary is?
Hope that wasn't a rhetorical question The so-called "working boundary" is a recent spiel by Pakistani arm-chair strategists whose children are living abroad to say this is the line that Pakistan doesn't accept but which India must not cross. As a side effect, Pakistan wants to imply that the real boundary is somewhere deep inside India, the actual location depending solely on their imagination.
Perhaps this is my 4th time asking the same question on this website. I couldn't find the answer anywhere. Can somebody please tell me what a working boundary is? I genuinely want to know. Thanks
The author forgot to mention that Indian Kashmiris are allowed to settled anywhere in India and they do so by the thousands to start shops selling Kashmiri products. Discrimination!
Do you have anything similar to Article 370 for POK ?
What does an internal Indian Consitutional Section got to do with nuclear war? I read the heading and didnot bother wasting time.....only blinkered and brainwashed Pak military apologists can talk of such things!
The author is misleading the readers by saying that it the BJP that wants article 370, according special status to Kashmir, to be abolished ... the truth is, majority of Indians have realized that this article 370 has done no good either to Kashmir or India in the past 68 years... therefore the logical next step is to abolish the same ... !
Another opinion maker threatening a nuclear catastrophe.
Nothing new in this piece. Blame India for everything and never even contemplate any other angle. Mr Mahmud please come out of this rut in your thought process and present some constructive ideas.
Kinda like Kargil, is it not possible that India version may have truth in it?
As always, Pakistanis just don't understand the world or world politics.
I want to ask the esteemed writer if there was one instance in Pakistan's history where it did proper analysis in the last 60 years?
Do what the Chinese have done in Tibet, flooded Tibet with Chinese nationals to make the Tibetans a minority. Let the Indian nationals settle in Kashmir and do business there. It will be good for the development of Kashmir. Open call centres there create jobs for the locals and develop the infrastructure. It will be good for Kashmir and India.
We Pakistanis are like a failed lover who thinks he is the exclusive lover of a lady called world and India as the rival who needs to be rejected in humiliated way .Since It doesn't happen we find no other way but scratch our own face in blood.What stupidity.
This article is nothing but a juvenile rant that belies the hypocrisy that Pakistan has indulged in for the past 68 years.
Indians and Modi have begun to realize that there is no point talking to a civilian government whose hands are tied when it comes to foreign policy or security policy not to mention the deceit the establishment constantly indulges in. A prime example of this is after yesterday's bomb blast in Wagah where Pakistani Rangers requested the BSF to defer the ceremony for 3 days which the BSF acceded to, but Pakistani Rangers held the ceremony to show that the BSF is somehow scared to hold it on the Indian side of the border as can be seen by the narrative being aired in Pakistan.
It is clear as vermilion that the Orange Lord is a Hindutva reincarnation of the most malevolent deity in the Sanatana Dharma configuration. With a nom de guerre of 'Butcher of Gujrat' bestowed, by the stellar Indian Press. Rising India, indeed, is more akin to a very evil darkness slowly enveloping the sub continent. It has been proven by so many separate investigations that Mr. Modi was very involved in the planning and destruction of Babri Mosque. And there was never any doubts as to where Mr. Modi stood. Total virulent hate hate towards Muslims and Pakistan. In that order.
Modi and BJP represent India's mood right now. Why should India be nice to a neighbor which has been anything but neighbourly? A new government is always a right time to question policies that failed. The congress party's Kashmir policy is one of them. In the last J & K lok sabha elections, BJP got the most number of votes. In the coming J & K state assembly elections BJP is expected to come to power, if not on its own, than in coalition with Mehbooba Mufti's PDP.