‘No’ to sabre-rattling, ‘yes’ to peace

Conflict between Pakistan and India is in neither side's interest. it only benefits weapon-producing world powers.


Naveed Hussain November 15, 2010

Let's rewind history back to 1947. Suppose the fate of Jammu and Kashmir is decided, like most of the other 500-odd princely states, according to the June 3 partition of British India plan. Now, 63 years later, where do you see Pakistan and India and the quarter of humanity living here? Whatever your answer may be, at least I'm convinced, the situation would have been quite different.

The two countries have been at odds on the Kashmir issue since they emerged on the world map. Neither side is ready to budge, adding to their mutual acrimony and dimming hopes for a negotiated settlement of the dispute. Political extremists are playing politics on the issue. And sane voices die down in the cacophony of extremists.

Take Arundhati Roy. She becomes a ‘traitor’ when she says Kashmir isn’t an “integral part” of India. Not only that, political extremist groups, like the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Bajrang Dal, call for trying her on sedition charges.

Cross the border and the situation isn’t any different. Militant organisations, or jihadists as they call themselves, are resurging after a hibernation of four years or so. The United Jihad Council, an umbrella group of a dozen Kashmiri militant outfits, proved its strength in Muzaffarabad on this Kashmir Day. And now, they are mobilising supporters for breaching en masse the Line of Control (LoC), the de facto border between Pakistan and India in the disputed territory. It's natural. When 100-plus unarmed Kashmiri protesters are killed by Indian forces in just over four months, Kashmiris on this side of the LoC will definitely feel the pain. India’s reluctance to discuss Kashmir is serving no purpose. It's only adding to the jihadists’ appeal, it’s only feeding hate-mongers and filling pan-Islamic radicals in the Pakistani society with hatred against an ‘infidel’ India.

Conflict between Pakistan and India is in neither side's interest. It only benefits weapon-producing world powers who need conflicts around the world to keep their ‘war economies’ going. Proof: Britain’s BAE Systems and Rolls Royce won over $1 billion deals in India in June and America’s Boeing clinched $4.1 billion in contracts this month. Pakistan is also trying to catch up, setting aside each year a major chunk of its meagre resources for defence purposes.

Now the question is, do Pakistan and India need stashes of weapons while hundreds of thousands of their citizens are living below the poverty line? Answer: a big ‘no’. Instead maximum resources need to be diverted to improving the living standards of people in the two countries. This is possible only if peace is restored. So for this to happen, let’s bridle our hawks and allow sane voices to be heard, let’s find an out-of-the-box solution to the Kashmir dispute, let’s stop sabre-rattling and talk peace.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 16th, 2010.

COMMENTS (40)

Xohaib shahzad | 10 years ago | Reply well i read your column,,, its quite good but ma opinion is a lill different,,, there is no such thing as Peace,,, if there is, it can't be ensured through a piece of paper,,, might is right,,, probably heard it,,, that's what's happening out there,,, only faith in ALLAH and your sword can get you to the top,,,
vikas ranjan | 10 years ago | Reply @Ali Sina Mark my words — a sinocentric world order will arrive in the 21st century, and if the subcontinent does not wise up because of religious differences, that would be an invitation to a new colonial power to dominate the entire subcontinent. The choice is ours to make, collectively. I think at least one country in the subcontinent has already cast its lot with the emerging colonial power, Gwader, Gold Mines and Gilgit Baltistan are pointers in that direction. It is from this perspective that they also dare to double deal USA, going to the extent of stopping NATO supply convoys and having them looted and burnt.So in effect the die is already cast.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ