As a sovereign country, Afghanistan has every right to make decisions according to its own geo-political considerations, and it needs to pursue any solution that could lead to some sort of stability within the country and the wider region. While the US plans to pull out a large number of its troops from Afghanistan by the end of the year, the situation there is not even close to being peaceful. Pakistan knows well that only a stable Afghanistan would result in an end to violence in the region. But achieving this will not be easy. The failure to successfully include all stakeholders in an all-inclusive Afghan government, the Afghan Taliban gaining strength and the fear of total collapse of the administrative system are some concerns that might have contributed to Pakistan’s changing stance. Learning from history, the US would also not have wanted to repeat its policy of use-and-abandon in the region, which is essentially what happened after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Apart from counterterrorism operations, the presence of US forces will ensure that the Afghan security forces will continue getting much-needed aid.
While Pakistan now ostensibly seems to be focusing on following a non-interventionist policy in Afghanistan, cross-border attacks and territorial disputes, along with claims of shelling from across the border are issues that will come into play soon. However, while scars from events like the Salala incident will not be easily forgotten, if peace is to prevail, increased cooperation among Pakistan, Afghanistan and the US is a must. But we also need to see how Pakistan’s support for the BSA will be viewed by other powers, like Russia and China. While Pakistan should focus on promoting peace and an independent Afghanistan, it will have to contend with a lot of tricky factors in times to come.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 4th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Are Canada & the USA a threat to each other ? No !
What about our region ? Who is a threat to who ?
Once during the heady daze of European nationalism , Britain & France were enemies.
Germany and the rest were at each others throats.
Lets do the same reconciliation in our part of Asia.
It's pretty obvious that neither Afghanistan or USA care whether Pakistan supports the BSA ... why would Russia or China care whether Pakistan supports the BSA?
Is it not time to cough up the Afghan Taliban leaders which Pakistan has been sheltering on its soil, if it wants to establish any credibility with the Afghan people ? Either the Afghan Taliban must join the democratic process or be wiped out, the region can do without spoilers continuing their wayward ways.
@3rdRockFromTheSun:
That is the EXACT conclusion,Sir.
In fact the US wants its presence there. The Afghans too need them . Karzai would not sign the pact. The next government has done so.
Now the Taliban may continue saying that they will never accept any " foreign troops " and act against it.
What is in the best interest of the REGION ?
I think the Pakistani mandarins read the tea leaves wrong! They were fully expecting a complete pull-out of the US troops; which would essentially leave Afg govt at Pakistan's mercy. Hence the 'establishment' had continued to differentiate between 'good' and 'bad' Taliban.
The Americans and Afg seem to have upset the applecart; and now Pakistan has no choice but to accept the ground realities!