Manipulation: Six banks linked to rigging currency markets, says report

Investigators believe instant messaging was used to influence fix.


Afp September 27, 2014

LONDON:


Six banks may face record fines in Britain as they begin talks about a settlement following an investigation into allegations of rigging currency markets, the Financial Times reported.


Barclays, Citigroup, HSBC, JPMorgan Chase, the Royal Bank of Scotland and UBS have begun meetings with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to agree a settlement, and fines may amount to over £1 billion ($1.6 billion, 1.3 billion euros), according to sources close to the situation.

Several financial institutions have suspended traders due to the alleged manipulation, which comes after the Libor scandal over the rigging of the London Interbank Offered Rate, a flagship instrument affecting borrowing costs around the world.

In the new rigging case, investigators believe traders used Internet chat rooms and instant messaging to work together illegally to influence the WM/Reuters fix, the dominant global benchmark in the currency market.

A criminal investigation separate to the FCA’s probe is under way. Britain is keen to safeguard the reputation of the City of London, the world’s foremost hub for the $5.3 trillion-a-day currency market.

On Thursday, the government announced it planned to extend laws criminalising the fixing of Libor to cover seven major benchmarks including in oil, gold and currency markets.

Investigations of currency market rigging are not limited to Britain, but extend to Germany, Switzerland and the United States.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 28th, 2014.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (1)

Parvez | 7 years ago | Reply

.......and long ago BCCI got chopped....while the rest today are having a finger wagged at them. No points for guessing why ?

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read