The incident with Rehman Malik was captured on cellphone cameras by several passengers, complete with audio and spread rapidly across the social media on the morning of September 16. Few, if any, sprang to the defence of the senator (and former interior minister), and some saw the incident as the start of a revolt against VIP culture. The blame-and-denial game started within minutes of the video going viral, statements were issued right and left and the waters swiftly muddied and remain muddied 24 hours later.
The people of Pakistan are heartily sick of being inconvenienced and brushed aside by their politicians — and others of elevated position — who believe in their unassailable right of primacy of passage. Whether it is in the air or on the ground these people demand and get ‘protocol’ and ‘respect’ on the entirely specious grounds that they are in some way more deserving than everybody else using the roads or airways. They stop traffic sometimes for extended periods, jump queues automatically, have their thugs intimidate anybody that might object to their behaviour and generally act like the kings and queens that they most assuredly are not. They are supported by obsequious police and grovelling captains of aircraft fearful for their jobs and the pernicious cycle goes round and round.
Privilege even extends to those who no longer hold office — Rehman Malik is no longer a minister — and the saga of the defeated MNAs who refused to vacate their parliamentary lodge accommodation after the last election dragged on for months. They eventually had to be forcibly evicted, protesting a violation of their ‘rights’ as they were, by the Capital Development Authority (CDA). Whilst nobody in Pakistan has yet gone as far as those protesting against corruption in Ukraine who manhandled a senior politician into a rubbish skip and then beat him with his own briefcase, one suspects that there will be many who would not raise a demurral were that ever to happen. The evicted ex-parliamentarians in Islamabad garnered not one iota of sympathy.
Two threads are intertwined with the incidents noted above. One is a deepening mistrust and outright dislike of politicians particularly those of the ‘Old Order’; and the other is an awakening that appears to be gathering pace by the day to the realisation that direct action can occasionally have dramatic results, all the more amplified if there is a cell phone with camera enabled waiting to capture every detail. Social media, particularly Twitter and Facebook in Pakistan, are avid consumers — and propagators — of gossip that is sometimes ill-founded, and a growing play-bill of the gaffes of those that purport to rule the nation. However, in this particular situation, they were important vehicles in channelling public resentment against the ruling elite.
Embarrassing a politician with an inflated sense of his own importance is all very well, but vigilantism is a slippery slope in a society as volatile and prone to violence as exists in Pakistan. The mob does not come equipped with a handbrake, and events all too quickly can slip out of control. By all means let us challenge the VIP culture at every juncture, expose those who abuse their position, but do so within the bounds of the law — a revolution we sense the people may welcome.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 18th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (9)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Yes if people got together and discussed it with MNA, the problem should resolved itself. i am surprised no one has thought of it before.
@salman: Isn't Boris Johnson the one who said that any Britian travelling to the middle east should be assumed guilty of terrorist acts? He wanted to upend the entire British legal system. He's not exactly the best person to put forward as an example of a humble public servant.
LOL a revolution within the bounds of the law. Perhaps some sort of civilized debate over tea and cakes?
@Osman: @Javed:
I've never seen a meeting of minds such as this!!
Why do people have to wait in traffic when some so called "VIP" has to pass. What exactly is the thinking behind this. Are VIP's more important? is their time more precious? are they worth more than ordinary folks? Is their security more important ? What other reason could there be, can any reader please answer, can any "VIP" please answer, I shall be most grateful to know the mindset behind this status quo. Hundreds of people have to wait for a VIP motorcade to pass, Why?. Some have emergencies, many have lost their precious lives while trying to reach medical help, some have other emergencies. Why cannot the people in charge of all this understand that common folks are very frustrated, they have and will take law into their own hands if this continues. VIP's are not more important, their time is not more precious, they are not worth more than ordinary folks, their security is not more important than ordinary folks. Does any reader disagree? does any VIP disagree?. If so why? please answer. Lets hear what the other side has to say.
Wish there was a balanced write up as this is not a piece written by any one but an editorial. you can hate politician and speak against them but will you dare to write such an editorial against VVIP protocol given to Generals or judges