Democracy in Pakistan

Published: September 15, 2014
The writer is an activist

The writer is an activist

The protesters led by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan and Pakistan Awami Tehreek chief Dr Tahirul Qadri, who have overturned the politics of Pakistan for the past two weeks or so, have many ambitions for their homeland. While one can differ with the PTI’s demand for the prime minister’s resignation, few would argue against the substance of Imran Khan’s grievances that the current electoral process is seriously flawed faulty and needs major reforms.

The prevailing electoral process is faulty to the core and it shall not evolve even after the next 20 general elections if not reformed. Without an iota of doubt, the polling process should be rigging-free, transparent and fair but there is another aspect of the electoral process that needs immediate attention of all those political parties which believe in true democracy. The filter that should prevent the candidates having a criminal record from contesting polls is missing from the process.

As a matter of fact, at least 55 candidates from Punjab only, belonging to 10 different sectarian groups, were allowed to contest the May 11 polls despite the fact that intelligence agencies had warned the election commission that they were on terrorist lists. Forty of these 55 candidates, who were allowed to run for parliamentary elections, belonged to the outlawed Sipah-e-Sahaba which had already been renamed as the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat (ASWJ). In addition to that the ECP had issued a warning of a three-year jail term for any candidate found using sectarian means to campaign. But strangely enough, none of these candidates were proscribed.

A PML-N MNA from NA-107 Gujrat had been handed down the death penalty under Section 302 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997 for the murder of six people during a failed assassination attempt on his political rival in 1998. His nomination papers for the May 11 elections were rejected by a returning officer after an independent candidate challenged his eligibility to run in the elections on the murder charge as well as his alleged connections with banned terrorist outfits. However, he was later cleared by an election tribunal of the Lahore High Court to contest the polls. There were reports of yet another PML-N MPA who was caught on tape attacking a police station in Faisalabad.

It is a good omen that all political parties in Parliament have a consensus on introducing electoral reforms. It is now the responsibility of all the political parties, including the PTI, to bring draft legislation for electoral reforms. For this purpose, the PTI leadership has to sit with other opposition parties in Parliament to prepare a new draft law, take it to Parliament and put the ball in the PML-N’s court. The Pakistan People’s Party has rendered great sacrifices for democracy in Pakistan. The party, founded by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, has braved two military dictators, including the tyrannical rule of General Ziaul Haq. Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto sacrificed their lives for a democratic Pakistan. The PPP has endorsed the allegations of the PTI about massive rigging in the May 11 elections on the floor of the House. The onus is on the PPP, which is the leading opposition parties in Parliament. The PTI, the ANP, the MQM and all other political parties should come up with a political solution, under the purview of the constitution of Pakistan, to the current political stalemate. Otherwise another military intervention would result in grave consequences. Only time will tell whether the PML-N government acts maturely to strengthen democracy or it will meet the same fate it did in 1997.

Democracy is not about beating the drums of democracy day in and day out. Democracy is more than determining a set of rules and procedures to run government. In a democratic system, government is just one element coexisting in a social fabric constituted of many other institutions, political parties, and organisations. Democracy is about making sure that the system ensures sovereignty of the people, good governance, majority rule, minority rights, free and fair elections, rule of law and guarantee of basic human rights.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 15th, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (5)

  • Ali Tanoli
    Sep 15, 2014 - 4:34AM

    what u trying to say bro dont we all know ik is right and please make his hand strong.


  • Genius
    Sep 15, 2014 - 11:33AM

    The fact is that “Democracy” does not exist anywhere in the world. Why?
    The people who need it most i.e the people at large, are not prepared to work to install it.
    Hence the rule by Mafiosis is being presented as democracy. Why do the Mafiosis rule everywhere in the world? The people have not thought of creating their own Mafia i.e. Peoples’ Union. Whenever the people will organise theirUnion, if ever they will see things get better. One thing we should never forget. To make things better we have to start from making our habits better. Virtue in peoples’ habit shall make the rule of virtue easy.


  • ishrat salim
    Sep 15, 2014 - 1:53PM

    IK / TuQ dharnas ” is a national awakening “…against the prevalent system of ” kleptocracy & oligarchical ” in nature…this need CHANGE !

    ” where laws do not rule, there is no Constitution ” – Aristotle. Seem quite specific to Pakistan….


  • Abid P. Khan
    Sep 16, 2014 - 1:37AM

    @Ali Salman Alvi:
    “…Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto sacrificed their lives for a democratic Pakistan….”

    Even if anyone would have chanced reading your write-up with some sympathy, the above sentence botched it.


  • muhammad ahmed khan
    Sep 20, 2014 - 8:06PM

    instead of maligning democracy, we should come with different jargon for democracy in pakistan !!


More in Opinion