Addressing the opening ceremony of the new judicial year 2014-15, the chief justice said that no person or institution is above the country's Constitution.
“Rule of law can only prevail in our country when judiciary remains faithful to the dictates of the Constitution. Let us renew our pledge to the same principles as we embark on the journey of another judicial year. Let this year be the time when we realise the aims and dreams set forth by us. Let this year be another milestone in the illustrious history of this court and our country,” said Mulk
The CJ said the primary obligation of every judge is “to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution,” which should be undertaken “without fear or favour, affection or ill-will."
“No consideration or obligation can rise above the loyalty of the judges to both the text and spirit of the Constitution. Judges do not merely interpret the words of the Constitution but also have the duty to preserve and protect it against any moves designed to defeat the scheme of the Constitution." reaffirmed Mulk.
The CJ added that the Supreme Court has demonstrated its determination to preserve and protect the written Constitution, thereby protecting and promoting democracy and good governance in Pakistan.
Mulk further said the Supreme Court and the judiciary shall forever endeavour to dispense justice to all, without being affected by any interest or extrinsic considerations. The CJ also said that a path which deviates from constitutionalism regresses into an age of apathy, where no rule of law exists.
“As a democratic society, it is incumbent upon all citizens to collectively promote respect for and obedience to the Constitution. The various facets of justice such as economic, political and social are correlated to the progress of Constitutionalism in our country," explained Mulk.
He further adds that progress, security and development cannot take place in the absence of safeguards provided in the Constitution.
"Rights and duties are like two sides of the coin; one cannot exist without the other. It is the task of the judiciary to ensure that rights in a democratic society are balanced with counter-imposed duties. Judiciary has to play a progressive role in the creation of such a peaceful society by endeavoring to promote adherence to the Constitution," emphasised Mulk.
The Chief Justice said that this judicial year started with a carry-over case balance of 19,932 cases, a total of 17, 491 new cases were instituted in the Supreme Court, out of which 13,872 have been disposed.
However, according to Mulk due to the carry-over backlog of cases from the previous years, the balance of pending cases before us is a colossal 22,089. "Although, we have had a very high disposal rate, our efforts still require further vigour," said Mulk.
He also said that in the last six months, the top court had already decided more than half of the criminal cases of which the backlog would be completely wiped out by summer 2015.
"A similar effort is being planned for tackling the backlog of Constitutional, Civil, Service, Revenue and other cases, the results of which would soon become apparent in the coming months. Work continued as usual during summer vacations till recently when all judges answered to the call of duty and the court started work at full strength a week early”
The CJ has also said that judgment in the Peshawar church bomb blast case remains a testament to the court's commitment to the idea of justice and equality for all without any socially created encumbrance.
COMMENTS (25)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Where was constitution when ex and present cj was taking oath from mr president Musharraf. ......... article 6 should be apply on sitting judges..????
This is just a set up by SC to try Imran under the Hudood ordnance for Sita white affair. We will not stand for it.
But the judges of every court , their families and their conduct is above Law, proven in recent times ............... either u accept it or not.............
Then why is Mush above the law and still not handcuffed like elected prime ministers of the country?
@Surprised: No! The SC has yet to make up its mind but it is taking too long. This inordinate delay is hardly a good augury for Pakistan.
@Obfuscation: The SC must consider the dharnis to be on the right side of the Constitution that is why it is not taking sue moto action to order them removed?
@Parvez: So you had nothing of substance to say.
A Chinese saying goes something like this ; If one has nothing of substance to say, it is better to stay silent.
By its selections of comments, it is obvious that ET is siding with the dharnis.
Is the present SC freeing itself of political considerations?
The country is burning but the SC does not take sue moto to correct the situation. Who is on the right side of the Constitution?
No person above the constitution (with the exception of Muslim League Nawaz and CJP).
No person above the constitution...but lot of persons above the law and we ensure they remain so
Our Justice system needs real overhauling. Impeccable integrity Judges should be appointed to the Court. We have a relative on the bench. He is raking it in big time. So much for "above the Constitution."
So, if "no person or institution is above the country’s Constitution" why do you NOT arrest Sharif Brothers for looting Pakistans Tax Revenues and taking it out of Pak?
Lets get 100 recently retired English judges over to deal with back log of commercial / property disputes (this should be non-controversial).
I am not a legal expert but laws should be similar (someone please advise if not).
Plant them somewhere safe (where they wont get shot of kidnapped) or do a video link and blitz the back log in 12 -24 month exercise.
Also set up 100 arbitration / mediation centres with well trained / independent professionals to try to deal with family disputes. This will be less painful and traumatic for litigants (and better for any kids involved if thigs resolved amicably).
Yes it out of the box, but we need out of the box solutions. Justice delayed is justice denied.
More than half of the Parliamentarians are violators of Article 62 and 63 of the constitution. Same CJ does not talk about that instead have played a role in electing same parliamentarians.
Just wondering with utmost humbleness, are these Dharnas which have paralyzed function of State in Islamabad,restricted free access to citizens to Constitutional Ave and storming inside parameters of Parliament Constitutional?. If an ordinary citizen breaks into government property,will (s)he not be arrested These Two leaders of Dharna have abused ex-CJP,ex-Judge of SCP ,judiciary, and officers of judiciary etc,why no action is not being taken against them.
He cannot see this government is the result of illegal election. Ex CJ is involved in rigging election. People face injustices every day. Are you living in cuckoo land CJ?
Isn't it the duty of Supreme Court to check whether some laws of the land contradict basic law of the constitution. Law clearly discriminate some section of society on the basis of religion whereas basic law give them equal rights. Why are minorities second rate citizens of this country why ?
Seriously, it's getting annoying now. These self praises are now taking a toll on our nerves. The same institution and judges have hung a prime minister, validated several martial laws, and taken oaths under PCO, under the guise of upholding the constitution.
Mr CJ, yes nobody should be above constitution and the constitution DOES NOT allow manipulation in election results. Moreover the constitution is set by Parliament and the Supreme Court "defines and elaborates" the constitution and gives ruling. May we ask you how many rulings this apex court has made and how many rulings implemented. May we also know how many cases against government are pending and why you have not taken them up?
Except CJ, CM(punjab) and PM(if NS)