The 2008 elections were fraudulent — conducted with 37.2 million fake votes. No one was held accountable. No one went to jail. The 2013 elections were massively rigged and porous. The ECP failed to disqualify candidates who made false asset declarations, exceeded the election expenditure limits, evaded taxes or had fake degrees, criminal records or dual nationalities. Of the 319 MNAs, 108 paid no tax at all. Three others paid less than Rs100. The elections returned not just the same set of ‘Pirs’, ‘Makhdooms’, landlords and decadent dynasties but also allowed members of the banned militant outfits to sneak in.
An electoral process that consistently recycles the same undesirable raw material cannot be expected to create a democratic order even after a thousand years. The ECP, much like the police and the bureaucracy of Pakistan, has become completely dysfunctional and incapable of self-reform. Our best option may be to dissolve the present structure and constitute a fresh ECP.
The ECP should consist of seven members, all below 70 years of age, selected from different segments of society — plain citizens, judges, retired civil or military officials and professionals. At least two of them must be females and one from a minority community. They should be selected by a committee consisting of the chief justice and at least six other judges of the Supreme Court. Once selected, the ECP members must themselves elect one out of the seven as the chief election commissioner.
As suggested by the Supreme Court, Pakistan should immediately adopt the ‘proportionate representation’ voting system in which the seats are allocated according to the total number of votes obtained by a party. The overseas Pakistanis ought to be given their right to vote. Every citizen should be free to vote from any location in Pakistan regardless of his/her permanent address.
Largely because of its incompetence and bureaucratic outlook, the ECP has so far failed to use the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). There ought to be no more elections without the EVMs, which can be developed, procured and tested in a few months. Smart national identity cards and biometric identification must be made a compulsory requirement, eliminating the need for wooden boxes, ballot papers and the infamous magnetic ink.
Effective scrutiny of candidates is the weakest link in the ECP’s chain. It simply cannot conceive and implement the processes necessary to undertake these tasks. Candidates must fill and make direct online submissions of nomination forms 90 days before the election. The entire information ought to be available on the ECP website — allowing 90 days to the ECP, the public, the HEC, Nadra, the FBR, utility companies, banks and other organisations to scrutinise the credentials of each candidate.
The seven members of the ECP must be directly responsible for the scrutiny of candidates while the role of the returning officers should be limited to supervising the actual conduct of elections. To give clarity to voters and to eliminate the need for subsequent by-elections, candidates must be limited to contest from one constituency only. Any participant contesting elections ought to surrender all licensed and unlicensed weapons as an evidence of his belief in conflict-resolution through peaceful methods.
Pakistan ought to adopt the ‘negative voting’ system. The EVMs must include the option to choose “none of the above”. Where the negative votes in a constituency are more than the highest votes received by a candidate, all candidates step down and there is re-election in that constituency.
Voting should be spread over 10 to 15 days. The government should provide free transport to carry voters from various localities to the polling stations. Political parties and candidates should be barred from providing transport, making payments or arranging free meals. The ECP should appoint professional teams to monitor and disqualify candidates for violation of expenditure limits. The system of ‘separate electorate’ should be done away with and people of all faiths should vote as equal members of a common electorate.
It is unfair to expect illiterate representatives to solve the complex problems of a modern state. Pakistan ought to reintroduce the minimum educational requirement of at least a bachelor’s degree. Finally, the term of the Parliament should be reduced from five to four years.
A parliament solely committed to its own preservation will not voluntarily adopt any of these suggestions. The only option for the people is to raise their voice and to reject those who refuse to change.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 26th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (16)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
I was surprised at the following comment by the author: “There is no need for Electronic Voting Machines which are expensive, controversial and inconvenient.” Can you imagine the number of papers saved in India in the last General Elections and consequently, the number of trees saved (as paper is made from trees)? EVM has other advantages but Pakistan should chose one that suits its purpose. It is difficult to rigg votes as is done with "fraudulent stamping" of ballot papers. EVM can be designed so that interval between 2 votes is prolonged, to avoid rapid "fraudulent" casting of votes. In the end, would it make a difference if elections were transparent if the people elected are still being influenced by the "establishment"? In a true democracy, people matter and their representatives elected to parliament matter and not the Army or ISI. Also, what kind of democracy sidelines the minorities? By declaring Pakistan an Islamic state, minorities have been reduced to the status of second class citizens. Pakistan has a long way to go to become a genuine democracy. I do not even consider India as a genuine democracy but it is a democracy that is for ever trying to improve.
Sadly Pakistan does not have a T.N.SESHAN who transformed ECI and sent shivers down the spines of Indian Politicians. People say one person can not bring the change.But Seshan proved it wrong. Though he was abhorred by all the politicians, for his integrity.
Requirement of a bachelor's degree can not be considered. Otherwise less than 10% of Pakistan's population will be eligible to vote. Educated people are mostly financially well-off which means the voters will not be a true representation of Pakistani population and then majority will not be associated with the outcome.
@Parvez Amin: Very few nations have used EVMs as successfully as India has. Apart from sour-grape reactions, few really reject the results of electronic voting. If Pakistan asks nicely, India will not be averse to let them have the technology.
Most of these are good suggestions. However, I disagree with the requirement for bachelors degree for being a member of parliament. John Major, a former Prime Minister of Britain, had no College degree. A vast majority of people in this country do not have a bachelors degree and in some areas you will find no one having such a degree, which means those areas will not have any representation.
Similarly, proportionate electorate is not suitable for nation-building, which is dearly missing in this country.
What we need is to elect true representatives of people and then they will work for their electors.
@Parvez Amin:
"There is no need for Electronic Voting Machines which are expensive, controversial and inconvenient."
India has been using EVM very successfully for many decades now. They are tamper-proof, reliable, fairly error free, prevents illegal voting and speeds up vote counting process. Once they are acquired, they practically last for ever. So, the cost is not that high in the long run.
Is the ECP an independent constitutional body? That is the only way to it make is scam-free. Pakistan should study the Indian system that has ensured free and fair elections in that country. The Indian election commission is an independent body as per the constitution which has made it impervious to political pressures.
Very thoughtful piece, comprised of pragmatic suggestions, would like to add one point, all candidates should declare their assets, and there should be strong scrutiny system keeping an eye throughout the stint of 4 or 5 years.
@author, I think Pakistan is very very far from implementing any kind of Election reforms mainly because, Pakistan's Military and ISI are too involved in electoral process.
Pakistan's Military and ISI both together or indivitually are very much deeply involved from the start of creating a political party itself. Also the Establishment as you people call, holds the full key bunch with respect to political freedom of all citizens of Pakistan
So were do you start reforms in the first case.
AS LONG AS EXISTING POLITICAL PARTIES BUILD CIVILIAN INSTITUTIONS WITH EXISTING SET UPS, CHANGING SLOWLY SO THAT IN EVERY SPHERE MILITARY IS MOVED OUT REFORMS OR FREEDOM OR LIBERTY IS VERY VERY UNLIKELY
Reasonable set of suggestions. But we are far from accepting any of these given the mindset and dependency on one or the other political figure.
ECP may be reappointed by Establishment.
There is no need for Electronic Voting Machines which are expensive, controversial and inconvenient. A system has been developed in which votes can be cast by any telephone at any time. ET please contact me for details.
A perfect list of suggestions for the future elections that I hope happen as "midterm elections". If all the suggestion put by the author are adopted by the officials with heart and soul and letter and spirit, that would be the day for Pakistan to say it is one of the largest true democracies in the world. These suggestions will not only help strengthen the democracy but also the democratic institutions. Well written, author. Government and bureaucracy, are you listening?
A totally biased article. The author sees the 2008 and 2013 elections rigged but keeps mum over 1986 and 2002 elections that were shamelessly rigged, not to mention the 1964 elections rigged through the first instance of lotas in Pakistan who elected Ayub as the lota-in-chief.
Every suggestion, i agree with.