TODAY’S PAPER | February 15, 2026 | EPAPER

Pakistan's lost economic freedom

Indices show reform momentum, but taxation, informality weigh on outlook


Dr Ali Salman February 09, 2026 4 min read

ISLAMABAD:

The Heritage Institute's Index of Economic Freedom measures 12 economic freedoms: namely, property rights, government integrity, judicial effectiveness, tax burden, government spending, fiscal health, business freedom, labour freedom, monetary freedom, trade freedom, investment freedom, and financial freedom.

These 12 institutional and structural pillars can be considered conditions for sustainable economic growth and development in a country. In its 2025 report, the Heritage Institute's Index of Economic Freedom classified Pakistan as a "repressed" economy, ranking it 150th out of 184 economies, with a score of 49.1 out of 100.

The report noted: "The government has demonstrated little commitment to much-needed economic reform. Efforts in key areas have been marginal at best. Measures to strengthen the management of public finance and reform outmoded economic structures have met institutional resistance. A judiciary that is susceptible to political interference and corruption undercuts property rights. Neither the entrepreneurial environment nor private-sector dynamism has been improved to any meaningful degree. The labour market remains stagnant. Much of the workforce is underemployed in the informal sector. High inflation has disrupted monetary stability."

The cut-off date for including data in the 2025 Index was June 2024. Thus, it makes sense to point out problems such as high inflation, which was around 12% at the time and already on a downward trend, or a perceived lack of commitment to reform, when the national debate was focused on avoiding default rather than on structural reforms.

On two accounts, the Heritage Index does not seem to reflect the actual dynamics, which is a fundamental problem and highlights the limitations of all such indices.

The index awarded a rather high score of 88.9% for "government spending" and 78.3% for "tax burden". This is because the index relies on two numbers: government spending and tax collection as a percentage of GDP. Pakistan's government spending is around 20% of GDP, while its tax-to-GDP ratio is 10%.

From an absolute perspective, 20% of GDP does not indicate an excessively large government. However, when one notes that interest payments and defence spending account for almost 70% of total expenditure, and when we consider wasteful spending in other areas, then a high score for public spending becomes largely irrelevant. Similarly, while a 10% tax-to-GDP ratio may sound like a country with a low tax burden and, therefore, high economic freedom, the tax burden on those who actually pay taxes remains very high. Fast forward to the first quarter of 2026. How will the next edition of the Index of Economic Freedom view economic freedom in Pakistan?

Since the last edition of the index was published, the tax burden on taxpayers has increased substantially. Pakistan's top marginal tax rate on individual incomes has risen from 35% to 45%. The super tax, initially introduced as a temporary levy on corporate incomes above a certain threshold to meet the costs associated with internally displaced populations, has recently received judicial cover. This has raised the effective tax burden on large corporations to more than 50%.

It is true that inflation has now been largely tamed, hovering around 5%. It is also easy to establish that the government has made credible commitments to reform, visible in PIA's successful privatisation programme, a new open and trade-oriented tariff policy, and a concerted drive to improve the regulatory environment through the regulatory guillotine process. These developments should help improve Pakistan's score on economic freedom.

On the other hand, as noted earlier, several sobering observations in the 2025 Index of Economic Freedom remain valid today and, in some aspects, we are worse off since 2024, when the data was collected. The unemployment rate has increased, and most of the workforce continues to be underemployed in the informal economy. According to the latest official labour force survey, the informal sector employs 81% of our workforce; in the urban economy, the figure is 71%.

This is an exceptionally high proportion for an economy aspiring to move onto a sustainable development path. It is also significantly higher than what was reported in the previous labour force survey released in 2020-21, when informal employment stood at 72.5%.

The index described Pakistan's judiciary as "susceptible to political interference" and found that "corruption undercuts property rights". These observations were echoed in the IMF's Diagnostic report released recently. Available evidence suggests that political interference in our judicial system has increased. This erodes investor confidence in the dispute resolution process and acts as a deterrent to new investment.

The lack of fresh private-sector investment also remains a challenge to the narrative of macroeconomic stability, as investment-to-GDP has not picked up. Exports during the last six months of 2025 have declined compared to the same period in 2024, although this appears to be partly the result of across-the-board tariff reductions.

These negative developments will either push the score downwards or prevent any meaningful improvement in these areas.

In the final analysis, Pakistan's outlook on economic freedom, as viewed through an institutional lens, presents a mixed picture. If reforms are given higher weightage, our score will improve, but it will be undermined by backward progress in other parameters.

THE WRITER IS FOUNDER AND CEO OF POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MARKET ECONOMY, AN INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC POLICY THINK TANK

COMMENTS (2)

Shahab | 6 days ago | Reply Economic Freedom in Pakistan A Mixed but Instructive Picture The latest Heritage Index of Economic Freedom ranks Pakistan among the repressed economies placing it 150th out of 184 countries. While such indices have their limitations they still offer useful insights into the institutional foundations of long-term growth. A few reflections - Institutions still matter more than macro numbers. Issues around property rights judicial effectiveness and government integrity continue to weigh on investor confidence and private-sector growth. - The tax burden is unevenly distributed. Pakistan s tax-to-GDP ratio may appear low but the effective burden on the formal sector is extremely high. This discourages investment and keeps businesses in the informal economy. - Reform momentum deserves recognition. Recent steps privatization efforts tariff rationalization and regulatory reforms signal a shift toward a more market-oriented approach. These may not yet be reflected in the index. - Aggregate fiscal indicators can be misleading. Government spending as a share of GDP looks moderate but when a large portion is pre-committed to interest and defense the room for development spending remains limited. 5 Informality remains the biggest structural challenge. With over 80 of the workforce in the informal sector Pakistan s growth model still lacks the depth and productivity needed for sustainable development. Bottom line Pakistan s economic freedom outlook is neither entirely bleak nor convincingly positive. The trajectory will depend less on short-term macro stability and more on sustained institutional reforms that encourage formal investment productivity and job creation.
Shahab | 6 days ago | Reply - Agree Structural indicators reflect real institutional weaknesses The Heritage Index focuses on institutions such as property rights judicial effectiveness and government integrity. Pakistan s persistent issues with political interference in the judiciary weak contract enforcement and corruption are widely acknowledged by investors and international institutions. These are long-term structural constraints that justifiably depress the country s economic freedom ranking. - Agree The tax structure is distortive despite a low tax-to-GDP ratio While Pakistan appears to have a low tax burden at 10 of GDP the reality is that the burden is concentrated on a narrow formal sector. High marginal tax rates super taxes and heavy indirect taxation discourage formalization investment and corporate growth. Therefore the index may underestimate the actual pressure on compliant taxpayers. - Disagree The index does not sufficiently account for reform momentum Economic freedom indices are backward-looking and depend on lagged data. Pakistan s recent reforms privatization initiatives tariff rationalization and regulatory streamlining are not fully captured. If these measures are sustained they could materially improve the business environment meaning the current ranking may not reflect the evolving policy direction. - Disagree Aggregate spending and tax ratios can be misleading metrics The article correctly points out that measuring government size purely as a percentage of GDP ignores spending quality. In Pakistan a large portion of spending is pre-committed to interest and defence leaving little for development or productivity-enhancing investments. Thus a high score on government spending may give a distorted picture of actual economic freedom. - Agree Informality and weak private investment are the real tests The exceptionally high share of informal employment and stagnant investment-to-GDP ratio suggest that the economy remains structurally constrained. True economic freedom should translate into formal job creation higher productivity and stronger private investment areas where Pakistan has yet to show meaningful improvement.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ