Poverty, its nature and the levels thereof, is a matter of endless contention. There are a range of indices to measure poverty and not all of them arrive at the same conclusions. Poverty is multidimensional: it is not just an absence of money, it is also a lack of sanitation, potable water, a secure daily source of food, job opportunities or access to healthcare and education — and one does not need to be a statistician to see that there are major deficits for millions of people across all of those indices in Pakistan. The report tells us that 52 per cent of the population lives in poverty and that the proportion of the population living in multidimensional poverty has increased by almost three per cent in a year. Tens of thousands of people have crossed the line into multidimensional poverty in a very short time. It is worth noting that the index used for the calculation was devised by Amartya Sen of India and the Pakistani economist Mahbubul Haq.
The annual publication of the HDI is one of those events that makes a ripple for a day or two before being relegated to the bottom of the news agenda. Presumably, it will be read in government offices and the headquarters of aid and development agencies. Figures will be mulled upon, heads shaken here and there, and the report filed never to be read again. At that level, it is arguably a pointless exercise, doing nothing more than provide a decent salary for statisticians and economists — but it would be wrong to see it only in that light.
Haggling over the precision of the report takes nobody anywhere. In broad brushstrokes, it is a fair snapshot of where Pakistan and other countries are in terms of developing their human potential. Many of the countries at the bottom of the scale share symptomatologies — poor or unstable governance, over-investment in military hardware against underinvestment in health and education, and out of control demographics as their populations expand past the capacity of the state to sustain them. There is also endemic corruption and medieval social structures that are highly resistant to change and crippling long-term internal conflicts based on faith or ethnicity. Some states, such as Bangladesh and to a degree Pakistan and India, suffer regular natural disasters, which are impediments to growth.
Pakistan is not going to cure its many ills in the near — to medium-term, but neither is it too broke to fix. It has the ability to bump along at the bottom of the development scale for decades to come, but it also has the capacity for positive change. Finding the political will is the real challenge.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 1st, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Hari Om: Same applies to India. Look at the size of its military. Also if you think India is doing better than Pakistan, have a look at Human Development Report. Just spitting venom or calling each other names will not help to stabilize the region or help in the prosperity of their people. There are things that you have to do and there are things that we have to do. Also please stop lecturing Pakistan, we have a large professional class who can do things. Just pay attention to your problems and we will address ours at our end.
Pakistan is lucky that Indian Muslims didn't move to Pakistan at the time of independence as expected. Pakistan has more resources per person compare to India and still below in HDI. Muslims growth in the subcontinent since 1750 is primary due to population growth. One child policy for 30-60 yrs in whole subcontinent is must.
Every pakistani who talks about poverty in India these figures are eye opener. 52percent of population live under poverty. Bangladesh is doing batter then you guys. Next year this condition is going to worsen because of high number of IDPs.
I have on multiple occasion on these comment pages of ET pointed out that Pakistan has an obsession for boxing above her weight class and nurturing an outsize military in order to seek military parity with India resulting in the inevitable consequence of entailing Pakistan figuratively “Eating Grass”.
Against the above backdrop news that Pakistan stands in the Low Human Development category comes as no surprise. This stark reality is the inevitable outcome of Pakistan’s obsession for boxing above her weight class and nurturing an outsize military in order to seek parity with India leaving little resources for a whole range activities that would contribute to the human development civilian Pakistani’s. Till such time as Pakistan accepts the immutable reality that she is inferior to India, Pakistan’s civilians will continue to suffer.
The solution is thus rather straight forward. Pakistan needs to accept that she is India’s inferior. The big question that then remains is will Pakistan make the rational choice and junk the braggadocio of attempting to seek equality with India? Or will it accept the inevitable consequence of misallocating resources in favour of the Military entailing Pakistan’s civilians figuratively “Eating Grass”?.
Simple solution: Bring down the size of population through education and modern technology. If Pakistan cannot contain its population growth, the situation will further worsen and with the grace higher authority we will be at number 187.