All of this has happened before; however this time there is one major difference. The elected government has ‘requested’ the Army to come take over Islamabad. Article 245 of the Constitution is being invoked in Islamabad. The Army is to take over Islamabad. Yes, one can phrase it in any way one likes, called to ‘assist’, ‘support’, etc. The Punjab chief minister sometime back ‘requested’ the Corps Commander Lahore for military security to be provided to the chief minister’s residence.
All of this is for what? Is it for the ‘feeble threat’, ‘storm in a teacup’ of His holiness Dr Qadri and Mr Imran Khan? Mian Nawaz Sharif persists with the habit of creating disasters, pretending to ignore them and finally simply grossly overreacting; a habit which has cost him very dearly in the past. The motives of Dr Qadri are not questionable, they are unquestioningly anti-democratic and his methods unscrupulous. Mr Khan does not know what he wants, except for trouble, and all around, and yes, at some stage in life to be prime minister. However, Mian Sahib’s response to this, like his response to almost everything is curious; oscillating between denial and panic. Invoking Article 245 is indeed panic-inducing and dangerous. To deny that this is in response to the potential havoc likely to be wreaked by Qadri, Khan and other assorted mischief makers is disingenuous and not convincing. The motives and the antics of the marchers are admittedly unpleasant. However, it comes with the job, prime minister. Mian Sahib, leaders do need stronger nerves than supervising motorways and flyovers, tasks which most contractors are able to accomplish quite adequately.
It is not only the lack of nerve which is disconcerting. It is the fundamental confusion that surrounds Mian Sahib’s policy. Mian Nawaz Sharif came into government with the visible intent of setting the civilian-military balance right, and that was exactly the right thing to do. However, in less than a year, there has been descent into utter confusion and contradiction. The PML-N government maintains that the trial of the Commando is ‘nothing personal’, and it is about holding a usurper to account. Central to Musharraf’s trial is the question of civil-military imbalance and proceeding with it displays the determination to rectify it. It would have been grounds for some minor celebration and the triumph of democratic ideals; had it been part of any broader trend so as to make us believe that the Commando’s trial is indeed ‘just business’. Alas, it is not. Firebrand members of the Cabinet look to storm the Bastille and triumphantly fly the flag of civilian supremacy one day, only to eat their words and mumble excuses the next.
This government is strong enough to try a former army chief/dictator, yet weak enough not to handle political acrobatics in Islamabad? Mian Sahib’s model of opposition was to do nothing really. While, Mian Shabaz Sharif sat in tent offices in Lahore and lead protests against oppressive Islamabad. Since after all the power crisis was simply caused by the inefficiency of the previous federal government, right? The real opposition was being done by the Supreme Court and the Media. Well, now the villains are gone, and Mian Sahib has to finally do something, anything, do not hold your breath though.
Suspension of fundamental rights, military courts and troops on the roads of Islamabad, Mian Sahib has watched this movie, and perhaps will remember the ending with no fondness. The Protection of Pakistan Act was a sign of the government’s plan of dealing with problems, essentially to allow excess force to be used by the civil law enforcement and military and that will make militancy go away. Now, the same model is applied to political problems.
The military offensive in North Waziristan was the opportunity to set the civil-military balance on the right course. Mian Sahib was required to take ownership of the offensive, give out policy, rather than read the ISPR press release in Parliament, when clearly his heart and soul were not in it.
The businessman in Mian Sahib dominates. The businessman looks at finished products, marketing and visible deliverables, the glossy and the glamorous. A flyover is visible in a way that meaningful legislation is not. The Model Town debacle did not lead to any policy or legislative discussion on police and administrative reforms. The Waziristan operation is accompanied by no debate on amending the FCR. The wind out of Mr Khan’s sails could have been taken out somewhat by having an expedited and meaningful public debate on reforming the electoral process (which does not mean that Mr Khan would have stopped agitation and protests, he has the remarkable ability to find something to protest about; it just would have been less effective). No overhead bridge can fix Balochistan, engagement and policy reform just might.
Mian Sahib is ceding more space to the military by invoking Article 245 and the Protection of Pakistan Act than he is regaining for democracy by the Commando’s trial (the Commando certainly needs to be tried in any event). Mian Sahib displays weakness by trying to sit out the war, while certainly gaining piety points for sitting it out in Saudi Arabia. Mian Sahib is trying to buy survival at the price of weakening democratic institutions and the progress of the past few years. Dr Qadri and Mr Khan have less than innocent intentions, yet, the fight has to be fought politically. Unfortunately, Mian Sahib has forgotten how to do this, certainly, without the support of a belligerent media and a hostile judiciary. The Army is a fickle ally (nobody knows it better then Mian Nawaz Sharif), if it is an ally to Mian Sahib at all at this point.
Pick yourself up, Mian Sahib. The fight has just started. The legitimacy of your government and mandate is not the issue. Your willingness to defend it is, so Mr Prime Minister get to it, fight the fight politically, having faith in yourself and your government. In any case, Mian Sahib, if your approach does not change there is no motorway wide enough to make get your government out of this.
Tailpiece: The June 19 Judgment of the Supreme Court by My Lord the former Chief Justice Tassaduq Jillani on the rights of minorities is what deserves the government’s attention; an excellent judgment by an excellent judge. The recommendations in that judgment are what good policy advice looks like and one dearly hopes that the government listens and implements it.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 27th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (28)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Ghulam Ali: ".... Khan’s struggle is to restore true democracy in Pakistan...."
Restore? I beg your pardon!
@H Chaudhry The author has brillianly described the state of art in the country and the sharif itate of mind in the Government. The people of the land will be better served if Mr Nawaz Sharif and his cronies heed to authors critique.
Rex Minor
I cant comprehend why pmln panick so much from pti rally
@H Chaidhry
It's quite amazing how PMLN govt is running with typing errors and mocking with people of Pakistan mandate.
Let me tell you the strategy of PMLN 2013 election; form govt with mass rigging and than use all govt resources to create hurdles for election Tribuanls to investigate the rigging allegations. Drag the rigging investigation untill PTI give up and do some sorts of typically dirty deals to shut their mouth. At the same time appoint each and every loved ones on all govt departments to gain absolute powers. Removal of reserve bank, NADRA directors etc are bright example for you.
PTI went to Tribuanls with rigging complaints and deserved to get results in 4 months as per constitution of Pakistan which did't happened in fact will never happened.
PMLN undermine the fact that PTI is a real political force with great leadership this country ever had. There is no dirty deals in PTI and that's what this nation wanted to hear from their leaders.
NS must get some incourage to tell the truth about 2013 election and accept PTI offer for 2013 election audit.
@Ali I Go listen to whole speech again. Chaudhry Nisar was mocking the 4 seats review by saying why stop at 4, why not 40 or all 272. It is to mock and point at the fundamental flaw in IK/PTI's childish demand. There were no promises as such Government cant do anything about ballot boxes that are jurisdiction of Electoral reforms.
I sometime read his rubbish stuff, and this time again. Though he tried to be critical of "Sri Paya, Nehari, Alo Ghosht", he still praised him. A very simple this which these pseudos need to understand: democracy is based on fair and free elections. Other than this is anything than democracy. Khan's struggle is to restore true democracy in Pakistan. Grow up man.
@Rex Yes Govt should give way to those who can do miracles but in due course and that due course will be next elections of 2018 period! Asking for mid term stuff is not only stupid but un patriotic and just shows greed and hunger for power that has turned IK from a reasonable man to a laughing stock and a whiner.
BTW there is again misconception about 245. The PTI march at this time is high place for any terrorist to do something evil or for PTI itself seeking violence with police circa lahore is strategy and Government successfully thwarted it!
@Anticorruption: asif zardari was tried for many years under fake cases,he spent 10 years in jail and nothing whatsoever has been proved,you should keep these facts in mind before writing mindless comments
@ H Chaudhry
Why Ch Nisar offer in assembly to verify the votes of 40-40 seats from both sides if the matter doesn't fall under govt jurisdiction? He was going to do it under what powers/bases?
What a one sided article. The writer should grow himself a bit and must watch tv at least 16 hours a day to know what IK wanted from this fraudulent govt.
Because civil pti supporters who were there and know that no way on this earth khawja Saad rafique could have won would like to see his civil tricks that pulled him his seat. Simple demand, recount the votes and stop taking stay orders, proof PTi and IK wrong, if you have a moral courage. We don't care if it was rigging on small scale or large, but if khajas have sneaked into parliament by other means , they have to be identified and shown the door. We residents know khaja Saad rafique did not win that day and would like to see his civility exposed.@H Chaudhry:
@Rex Minor: If PTI will be leading a peaceful march then they don't have to worry about Article-245. Is that the case though ?
@H Chaudhry: rs have the right to ignorek questions and the PTI reade You have the right to ask questions, and the PTI readers have the right to ignore your questions. A Government which does not allow peaceful protest march is not democracy conform and must give way to those who do not fear people.
Rex Minor
@Ali Pakistani: My Friend you are along very powerful question, that Nawab Sharif does not have any answers from Prime Minister. Real Leader does not have to go in a Brotherly Muslim Country to send his days, when so much turmoil is going on in Country. This is a lesson for us all Pakistanis that we should try new people to represent us in the Parliament and in Government.
@Jamshed Adamjeewala: Rather than being personal, talk with logic. Everyone would love to see your glibness, sharp mental, face and demeanor to make a judgement call on your personality and attitude.
There is a huge misconception about these "4" constituencies. It is even more surprising that an average Pakistani miserably fails to comprehend the situation rather continues to find something to blame and somebody. The truth is that there were 400 complaints to election commission and 300 have been resolved. The so called 4 seats is not under jurisdiction of Government but ECP. One of them is slow because of Stay order. "Stay Orders" are legal procedure, so essentially PIT/IK is asking people to not take their legal course?
FAFEN and every one agreed that PMLN has majority and elections were better conducted compared to 2002/2008. So why all this now? Why such a disrespect for PMLN vote and why now? Before election, every poll indicated PMLN will win so why all this now ?
PTI readers in a civil manner, I seek your answers.
Author: You call it weakness of nerves I call it showing of strong nerves why? because it's not against puppets but against those who have held the country hostage since it's inception.The failure of democracy in the past is largely because of the political impotence of politicians.Pmln must be appreciated to stand against media hype that has always helped dark forces to derail democracy. Political rights are for political forces those who don't believe in the system deserve no freedom and must be dealt with iron hand.pakistan is not a laboratory to be experimented by the whims of every alpha beta.Go ahead NS go and set precedents Pakistan need it badly.
@Anticorruption: you are forgetting the Zardari has faced 10 years in solitary confinement. Where's the punishment for Mush for his ill deeds
Stopped reading after "Mr Khan doesn't know what he wants". You people will keep writing columns till death but will not see the forest for the trees. The first step in a democratic transition, free and fair elections, the solution is staring in your face and all you can come up with is "Mr. Khan doesn't know what he wants?" Poverty of thought.
As Zardari said that the heavens would have not fallen if re-counting was done in the 4 constituencies in Punjab as demanded by Imran Khan, it seems they have done cheatings and came to Islamabad on fraudulent votes. It would have been prudent, if Nawaz Sharif had decided to go ahead and have the recount and deflate Imran Khan's balloon, but no, old habits seldom die. Nawaz Sharif and his party is the product of that notorias dictator Zia and how do you expect him to be democratic when he has never experienced democracy in true sense. I recall their most outrageous and unforgiving act of literally attacking the Supreme Court of Pakistan by their thugs and that included some PML-N's MNAs and MPAs where the justice had to take refuge for their lives, that shameful act was indicative of their past and future rulings. One could see in both brothers this streak of heavy handedness and dictatorial tendencies, Shahbaz Sharif' over reacted in Model Town and so did Nawaz Sharif by invoking Article 245. Some how I am starting to be more favorable to Zardari and company despite of their whole sale corruption by comparison to the Sharif brothers.
What is democracy? If the democracy is failing the nation and the state, will you still defend democracy?
Why do you so desperately want to try the ex President Musharraf?
What Musharraf did was the only logical thing that was to be done.
Do you think what was done by the then Prime Minister Nawaz was democratic? Not letting the plane with almost 300 passengers on board to land?
Do you remember the then Army Chief was a passenger on that plane?
Do you think anyone should be held accountable and tried for the crime that was committed?
What is done by the present Prime Minister Nawaz and his royal famil;y in the royal court, democratic?
Can you defend Model Town massacre by the democratic government of PML-N ?
Amazing column. Completely reality based. Mian Sahab need these consulting professionals
Writer fully remained in favour of PMLn but could not find a single positive point in PMLn policy and governence. While about PTI he gave a short fatwas "Mr Khan does not know what he wants, except for trouble, and all around, and yes, at some stage in life to be prime minister". I think writer should get in touch with current affairs so that he could know that PTI is protesting against election rigging and role of our judicial system in providing justice to affected parties.
A simple question with reference to the author's comment, "the commando needs to be tried in any event." One of these days, you should clearly explain your position and logic to clarify why Zardari shouldn't be tried for corruption and why his trial and the NRO proceedings were bad because they constituted selective accountability, but the trial of Musharraf is desireable for you even though that too is a case of selective accountability.
So basically there is no hope. If judiciary makes recommendations there are not followed, opposition tries to derail democracy, civ mil imbalance remains, judiciary has vested interests, media is bought and paid, politicians work against each other, bureaucracy is corrupt and inefficient, the honest ones are posted elsewhere when they refuse to do bidding of political masters, army is autocratic, government disinterested and apathetic. All mian sahab can do is pray in the Holy Land for his country; alas, I suspect he will just be praying for his own salvation or enjoying a holiday with his Saudi friends.
Well balanceed article
The author fails to mention the other half of Nawaz. His twin brother, by a few years. Also known as Chota Mian. Actually you can call him Chota wala Nawaz.or 'Little Bit' The lion of...er..The Quail Of Punjab was never meant to be a politician. He does not have the glibness, the sharp mental wherewithal that is mandatory for politicians. With a sour looking face, ungainly demeanor, slow on the uptake , he simply does not come across as a Nation Builder. A Leader, A Go Getter. Doing a fake opening ceremony at Nandipur power plant, tells you about the real Mian.