India beefs up its military

In the long run, it will inevitably prompt Pakistan to raise its own military budget to keep up.


Editorial July 12, 2014

The Modi Administration’s proposal to increase India’s military budget by 14 per cent over last year should not come as a surprise. The BJP has always advocated a more ‘muscular’ foreign policy, and criticised the Congress party throughout its tenure for being too ‘soft’ on issues of national security and defence. A beefed up military was also a campaign promise, and the new reforms in the defence budget seem to follow up on it.

All of this seems to bode ill for any future normalisation process between India and Pakistan. If the budget is passed, a further militarisation of the Line of Control is a reasonable, if unwelcome, expectation. And no doubt, India is aware of Pakistan’s own security travails, and wants none of them to cross over. And in the long run, it will inevitably prompt Pakistan to raise its own military budget to keep up. Despite the ominous tones, that would be a mistake.

India’s economic growth has compelled it to seek a greater role in global politics, and it seeks to gain military clout that could reasonably correspond with its new economic and regional status. While India’s revisionist aims are one factor, another is its neighbour in the north. India’s greatest military and economic rival is not Pakistan, but China. China has aggressively asserted itself in the South China Sea, and has also begun to do the same in the Indian Ocean, a move that India sees as a threat. Despite the 14 per cent increase, India’s military budget is still less than a third of China’s and Indian officials feel that they need to catch up quick if they are to achieve any semblance of military parity.

While India’s defensive considerations may not be Pakistan-centric, they will inevitably be perceived as such this side of the Radcliffe Line. Pakistan’s own military disparity has already prompted its foray into acquiring tactical nuclear weapons, and India’s military expansion will only accelerate their production. Whatever India’s defensive considerations, the presence of more — and more lethal — arms in South Asia cannot be welcome.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 13th, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (40)

Naresh | 9 years ago | Reply

@What the ?: What to say of a person who does not even quote one correctly. This is what I said: “They talk about GDP but don’t mention their rank in Per Capita Income which really matters.” Is this what you’re trying to hide “India’s Per Capita ranking is 140 vs. 143 of Pakistan (IMF data)”? Not a huge difference. Is it? Had we not been a victim of Indian sponsored terrorism during the last decade, we’d have been doing much better than India, as were we before 2008. . I am not arguing about the Differences in the Per Capita GDP and the reasons thereof. . Can you please "guide" me as to how you have embedded the bolded part with the URL. . Cheers

Mega | 9 years ago | Reply

@what the ? Does world believe you? What happened in mumbai? Question yourself why america,UK,UN,European Union have banned sanctioned such organisation in your country for attacking indja yet roam freely in your country. Tell me any indian govt office or org banned by world for attacking pakistan? World sees proof, when they have it they ban it. When you blame india you don't even knock india's door complaining or with proofs, your own FO doesn't issue a statement do they? Did they do that when the so called conspiracy theorist blamed india for karachi airport attack? Nope. Its local drama to keep trp and public on one side while other show other side to the world. It was Hilary Clinton who said home grown snakes who only bite your neighbours referring to your country policy. It has come back to bite you, for your own flawed "deep state" strategy..

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ