The Pakistan Peoples Party on Saturday held various events to mark July 5 as a black day throughout the province. On this day, 37 years ago, General Ziaul Haq dismissed prime minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s elected government. The military dictator imposed martial law and ruled the country for the next 11 years.
The Awami Workers Party arranged a lecture by its president Abid Hassan Minto on the topic Martial law by Zia, impact on the democratic process.
Minto said that the political environment in the country during the Zia era was very oppressive. “Martial law is never in the interest of people. It has always been used by a small ruling elite to reinforce American imperialistic interests,” he said.
Another event was arranged by the PPP’s labour wing at the Lahore Press Club. Senior PPP leader Senator Aitizaz Ahsan was the chief guest.
Talking to The Express Tribune, Aitzaz said he was very disheartened when he heard the news of the military takeover back in 1977.
“It was a very disappointing morning when I woke up to find that marital law had been declared and the prime minister was under arrest. The Parliament had been dissolved and Gen Zia would be addressing the nation in the evening,” he said.
Ahsan said the country had changed a lot since 1977. “There is a lot of difference between the Pakistan of July 5, 1977, when the army took over and abolished democracy, and the Pakistan of July 5, 2014, when the army is subservient to the civilian government,” he said.
“Had martial law not been imposed in 1977, we would have been far ahead of India economically and socially now. There would have been a tolerant and pluralistic society in Pakistan. There would probably be no terrorism,” he said.
The PPP Human Rights Wing and Peoples Youth Organisation also arranged events to highlight the struggle of the PPP workers and leaders for democracy and the people.
In Multan, dozens of PPP workers took out a rally at Katchery Chowk to mark the day. PPP district president Khalid Hanif Lodhi, city president Khursheed Khan and information secretary Khawaja Rizwan Alam took part the rally. The participants carried banners and placards with slogans in support of democracy.
Addressing the rally, Alam said Zufiqar Ali Bhutto was a dynamic leader, who made country’s defence strong by starting a nuclear programme. He said the PPP would continue to play its role for promotion of democracy.
Commenting on the day, defence and political analyst, Dr Hasan Askari Rizvi said the military controlled everything after the 1977 martial law. “On July 5, 1977, the military took over directly which meant that it controlled everything in the state. Today, the civil government is working, but it has a problematic relation with the military and has been unable to create a credible civilian alternative to military rule,” Dr Rizvi said.
He said the situation in 1977 was such that the opposition wanted to get rid of Zulfikhar Ali Bhutto at any cost and some of the leaders were prepared for a military takeover.
“At that time, the military takeover was expected and the only question was when,” said Dr Rizvi.
Saba Eitizaz, a broadcast journalist, said, “It was hard for everyone back then even my parents. My father had to appear in the Foreign Service exams again because the military dictator wanted to show his strength,” she said.
She said Pakistan would have been a different nation if martial had not been imposed in 1977.
Dr Taimur Rehman from LUMS said religious extremism was nurtured in the country during General Zia’s era.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 6th, 2014.
COMMENTS (12)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
extremism was there in the subcontinent even before partition and it is still there. There are many countries where extremism exists without Zia.
PPP should be grateful to Zia for giving them a new life in 1977. Bhutto, in his five years of (mis)rule had really messed up everything. Had there been a democratic transition, PPP would have been long dead and gone, but by suppressing PPP and killing Bhutto, Zia gave a new lease of life to PPP.
I think extremism actually started due to Bhutto but Zia drastically speeded it up.
OK, bhutto was dictator like, he was corrupt, you can say that, but at least don't try to defend zia for what he did to Pakistan.
It's just a shame that people as educated and respected as Aitzaz Ahsan persists in covering up the sins of his party rather than taking real stands based on principle. Theres really no difference between his actions and those of any other jiyala - he just uses his persona to give it a cover of respectability.
Bhutto got the ball rolling on religious extremism before Zia ever got around to it..... Declaring Ahmedi's non-muslims... backing movements in Afghanistan... Appeasing the maulvies - banning drinking and gambling.
Zia just came and finished the job...
Good to see all the first 4 comments so far. Really agree with the thoughts of all these 4 brothers. The political parties has only one formula. Win the elections. Bring in corruption, and then go. Then blame the new government for its wrong policies. : )
Unfortunately, the voice of Truth is stopped always, otherwise this kind of politics of PPP & Human Rights Activists should be brought into the court. Atleast Pakistan had a recognition in the era of Zia Sahab. He was not Drinker like other generals and previous politicians. He was a good muslim. Though he was not an ideal Muslim Ruler. But I can say with great believe that in the history of Pakistan, we the Pakistanis have been not been ruled by such Brave & Sensible Ruler with great ability of Long Sightedness. There have been numerous things, which I have read about him, making him the only President/Ruler of Pakistan having those abilities. He was the first Muslim Ruler, who was asked to do the Imamat in Khana e Kaaba (while Imam e Kaaba was not there, and Zia sahab had went for Umrah).
More Punjabi bashing by the PPP.
Grow up.
This is based on the naivete of those who think that if it wasn't for Zia, the CIA, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan would not have supported the Mujahideen against the Soviets in Afghanistan and not abandoned Afghanistan afterwards. Even if Humpty Dumpty had been the ruler of Pakistan, the CIA, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia would have supported the Mujahideen in Afghanistan. Hindsight has 20/20 vision.
Blame Zia for everything just like an Ostrich that is in denial and buries it's head in the sand. Zia was responsible for Al-Qaeda and ISIS too? You think CIA would not have supported Mujahideen against Soviets in Afghanistan if Zia hadn't been around?
Ok wait. It was Mr. Bhutto who had the Ahmedi community expunged from the fold of Islam and not Zia ul Haq. He was the one who appointed Zia as the COAS and it was his own dictatorial policies which led to the situation at first. Even his daughter was no different and continued with his legacy and became the most corrupt prime minister in the history of Pakistan. Injustice and corruption are what lead to extremism. The history of PPP has been full of lies and decept. We the people of Pakistan have been the real victims of its governance and policies. Even right now, it technically imposed Nawaz Sharif on us as our prime minister. I am really surprised that even people like Aitzaz Ahsan remain in denial.