The manner in which Iraqi security forces capitulated in Mosul showcases that they are incapable of defending Iraqi cities. Meanwhile, ISIS fighters are battle-hardened and have gained vital field experience in Syria. With Syria already home to a large number of radical militants, the fall of Mosul means that radical militants now control large swathes of land in the heart of the Middle East. To counter this offensive by ISIS, the Iraqi government has declared a state of emergency and Mr Maliki has appeared on television appealing for a unified effort to stop terrorism. A similar effort was made by the Iraqi leader after the fall of Fallujah, but efforts to wrestle back control from militants largely failed.
When the American presence in Iraq ended some two years ago, boastful claims about a ‘strategic defeat’ to al Qaeda were made by both American and Iraqi leaders. With the passage of time, those claims have proven to be ill-founded and completely wrong. Reports coming out of Mosul say that ISIS fighters have freed thousands of prisoners, raided ammunition depots, and have raised their flags on a number of government buildings.
Whether the Iraqi government and security forces are able to launch an effective counter-offensive against ISIS remains to be seen. The prime minister has vowed to arm civilians and mount a widespread operation against ISIS. A second Sunni Awakening could bolster the government but the lack of trust that Sunni leaders have in Mr Maliki will be a major handicap. The 50,000 or so fighters that were critical in helping American forces defeat al Qaeda are estranged with the current government and sitting on the sidelines. The Iraqi government has also been requesting missiles and artillery from the United States and with the situation in Iraq close to reaching a point of no return, one can expect the Americans to ratchet up military and intelligence support.
As the war in Syria dragged on and militants became more radicalised, there were fears of blowback in Iraq. These fears were initially brushed aside and there was a lot of confidence about the capacity of American-trained Iraqi security forces. With the passage of time, however, those concerned about the safety and security of Iraq after American withdrawal were proven correct due to two main reasons. Firstly, Mr Maliki has proven to be an ineffective leader and has marginalised Iraqi Sunnis, resulting in popular unrest against a largely Shia government. Secondly, ISIS has received training, motivated fighters and vital experience across the border in Syria, giving the group sufficient room to manoeuvre. The extreme nature of these militants can be judged by the fact that even al Qaeda, a group known for its brutality on the battlefield, had distanced itself from ISIS . A dysfunctional government coupled with a resurgent militant group has created a perfect storm, allowing ISIS to rapidly gain ground against a crumbling Iraqi security establishment.
To effectively deal with this rising tide of militancy, the Iraqi government must reach out to Sunni tribal leaders and bring them on board. Efforts must also be made to engage with regional and international powers, including Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the United States. A sustained and united effort is needed if Iraq is to turn around the momentum and defeat ISIS. Iraq is on the verge of collapse and should ISIS gain further ground, the entire Middle East could plunge into the abyss. The Iraqi prime minister has ruled in a manner that has isolated Sunni Iraqis and frustrated the international community. He must change course in short order, for a quick and effective response against ISIS is the only way to rescue Iraq from this crisis.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 13th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (9)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Strategic asset It might end when kashmir problem solved.
Where America goes mayhem usually follows. Saddam Hussein had Iraq well under control until the US illegally invaded and dismantled Iraqi military and police. Now, most of Iraqi law enforcement, and military are relatively new US appointees lacking experience and/or ability. . Also most of the main terrorist groups were initially funded by Saudi Arabia and the US, and still are as is the situation in Syria right now. It almost appears to be a plan to keep the Middle-East in a constant state of turmoil.
@2paisa: Because many like me come here every day hoping that some action is taken against the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks.
sunni soldiers giving up without a fight is not considered defeat of the while iraqi army rather its the surrender of the illtrained sunnis soldiers most of whom are part time soldiers simple init for the money which is exactly why iraqs assets and shia populated areas are manned by hardcore shia soldiers.
@Rahul,
Why do the Indian trolls linger so often on Pakistani sites/forums? NOTE: I am talking about trolls and not genuine people.
It is a bad situation in Iraq and must be reversed. Pakistan, please learn from the tumult in the Arab world. In the past, there have only been two contenders for power in Pakistan, political class and the military. For the first time there are three contenders. They all try successfully and fool the populations with their narratives. Only the Islamists will take Pakistan back to the seventh century and others to twentieth. Education is the way forward not massive militarisation.
@Rahul: You forgot, there is another one on Pakistan's eastern border as well.
Isn't this an early warning for Pakistan. This victory can be a great morale booster for TTP. I think the security forces should take severe evasive action against them before it's too late.
Congratulations! there is one country more dysfunctional than Pakistan.