Perhaps it should not be surprising that a party that derives its support primarily from urban and suburban voters does not seem to care for the rural economy. But we would argue that they ignore rural Pakistan at their own peril. Because the economy is essentially one long, intricately linked supply chain that starts in farms and grazing grounds and ends in the urban restaurants and shopping malls. The prices that urban consumers pay for what they buy is directly linked to the prosperity of farmers in the rural areas. It may not be a linkage that most voters are aware of, but they will certainly feel its effects if prices start to rise too fast, and they will punish the politicians who happen to be in office at the time.
Simply put, the more the government supports the agriculture sector — either through improving the rural infrastructure or through ensuring that farmers get fair prices for their goods — translates into more money for farmers, who constitute about 45 per cent of the country’s population. That extra money gets spent in two ways, both of them very good for the economy. The first is consumption: which spurs industrial production, benefiting urban factory workers as well as industrialists. And the second is investment in better productivity, which leads to better efficiency and more stable prices for goods. That, too, is something that would benefit urban consumers in the long run. In short, even if the PML-N wants to continue courting the urban vote, it cannot afford to ignore the needs of rural Pakistan.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 2nd, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ