Never was a visit more timely, more needed

The two leaders, fired by deep longing for quick economic strides, have an agenda cut out for them by destiny.


Rustam Shah Mohmand May 26, 2014
The writer has served as ambassador to Afghanistan and chief secretary of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. He is a nominee of the Government of Pakistan in talks with the TTP

There was no reason to decline an invitation to attend the oath-taking ceremony of Mr Narendra Modi. Firstly, all South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc) leaders were invited to attend the inauguration of the new Indian prime minister. By opting out, Pakistan would have singled itself out as a country that is not sincerely endeavouring to seek peace and pursue détente with the biggest South Asian country. Secondly, a refusal to participate in the inauguration would have led to more pronounced tensions and would have promoted more hostility, more suspicions. It would have been preposterous to help lay the foundations of a more belligerent policy towards Pakistan’s most important neighbour. Moreover, such a poor decision would also have invalidated the Saarc concept and principles of South Asian unity. Politically, it would have been naive to refuse to engage with a prime minister who commands such absolute majority in the Lokh Sabha and who has come to power on the back of an electrifying electoral campaign promising the advent of a new era of prosperity and rapid development. It would also make enormous sense to interact with a new leader whose past is maligned with accusations of showing indifference to the Gujarat riots of 2002 in which thousands of people, mostly Muslims, were killed when he was chief minister and established a rapport that may augur well for the people of South Asia. It would have been a grave error of judgment to begin, on a negative note, a critical phase in relations with India under a new leadership.

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s decision to undertake the visit is of historic importance because the two leaders in their many (hopefully) interactions would not only have to deal with a plethora of unresolved issues but also break new ground in areas such as reappraising their nuclear development programmes, reactivating the almost dormant Saarc partnership, establishing joint mechanisms for better water management on both sides of the border, liberalising trade and laying the basis for greater linkages and cooperation in areas like educational and cultural exchanges, tourism, environment, investment and a host of other mutually beneficial initiatives.

The two South Asian countries have enormous human potential that can transform the subcontinent in a short time thanks to modern technologies. It is lamentable that more than 400 million people in India live below the poverty line and more than 60 million people in Pakistan suffer the same fate. In India, the government has to spend $12 billion or one per cent of its gross domestic product on the programme of providing cheap grain to 180 million people. In Pakistan, seven million children do not go school.

South Asia generates only two per cent of the world’s income while housing a global population of 22 per cent. Of the world’s poor, 44 per cent live in South Asia!

Faced with such daunting challenges and with such grim prospects if the policy of a belligerent confrontation were to continue, can the leaders of the two great countries sit back and watch as the inexorable tide of anger continues to mount in a population which can be galvanised by a relentless media onslaught highlighting the frustrations and deprivations of the teeming millions of the subcontinent?

Nawaz Sharif’s visit should have something to do with these substantive issues that affect the lives of millions of people on a daily basis. Symbolism is important in circumstances like these. But the two leaders, fired by a deep longing for quick economic strides that change lives of the ordinary people , have an agenda cut out for them by destiny. Will they project into the future and carve out a new sustainable relationship that would lift one-fifth of humanity from the abyss of poverty, illiteracy and degradation and initiate a new era of meaningful cooperation that could shape the future of the region? It remains to be seen.

Judged in this perspective, never was a visit by a Pakistani head of government more timely, more needed or more justified.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 27th, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (19)

Rakib | 10 years ago | Reply

@Komal S: You may have a point. My comment was confined to Pak-Ind. Singh's overall FP-achievements (which I consider interesting) & failures are a related subject but different. Although BJP is despicable, IMO, Congress can deservedly go wander in wilderness & be penitent for a long, long while. It's bothersome that even after 7 decades Indian Polity has not learnt to take bipartisan stand on specific issues (except how to sulk with Pak). What prevents them from joining forces, doing homework, & presenting a united front to other countries on critical matters of national importance? The big egos of small men.

Komal S | 10 years ago | Reply

@Rakib: On the contrary it is the think tank in Congress that did not give MMS a free hand. UPA II unfortunately was a disaster both on domestic and foreign policy front in spite of having a better mandate than UPA I. Our foreign relations challenges was not just consigned to Pakistan. The big success we had with US relationship in UPA I was watered down during UPA II. Same is true with China.. Instead of blaming media and opposition the Congress party needs to introspect its own functioning.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ