Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s decision to undertake the visit is of historic importance because the two leaders in their many (hopefully) interactions would not only have to deal with a plethora of unresolved issues but also break new ground in areas such as reappraising their nuclear development programmes, reactivating the almost dormant Saarc partnership, establishing joint mechanisms for better water management on both sides of the border, liberalising trade and laying the basis for greater linkages and cooperation in areas like educational and cultural exchanges, tourism, environment, investment and a host of other mutually beneficial initiatives.
The two South Asian countries have enormous human potential that can transform the subcontinent in a short time thanks to modern technologies. It is lamentable that more than 400 million people in India live below the poverty line and more than 60 million people in Pakistan suffer the same fate. In India, the government has to spend $12 billion or one per cent of its gross domestic product on the programme of providing cheap grain to 180 million people. In Pakistan, seven million children do not go school.
South Asia generates only two per cent of the world’s income while housing a global population of 22 per cent. Of the world’s poor, 44 per cent live in South Asia!
Faced with such daunting challenges and with such grim prospects if the policy of a belligerent confrontation were to continue, can the leaders of the two great countries sit back and watch as the inexorable tide of anger continues to mount in a population which can be galvanised by a relentless media onslaught highlighting the frustrations and deprivations of the teeming millions of the subcontinent?
Nawaz Sharif’s visit should have something to do with these substantive issues that affect the lives of millions of people on a daily basis. Symbolism is important in circumstances like these. But the two leaders, fired by a deep longing for quick economic strides that change lives of the ordinary people , have an agenda cut out for them by destiny. Will they project into the future and carve out a new sustainable relationship that would lift one-fifth of humanity from the abyss of poverty, illiteracy and degradation and initiate a new era of meaningful cooperation that could shape the future of the region? It remains to be seen.
Judged in this perspective, never was a visit by a Pakistani head of government more timely, more needed or more justified.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 27th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Komal S: You may have a point. My comment was confined to Pak-Ind. Singh's overall FP-achievements (which I consider interesting) & failures are a related subject but different. Although BJP is despicable, IMO, Congress can deservedly go wander in wilderness & be penitent for a long, long while. It's bothersome that even after 7 decades Indian Polity has not learnt to take bipartisan stand on specific issues (except how to sulk with Pak). What prevents them from joining forces, doing homework, & presenting a united front to other countries on critical matters of national importance? The big egos of small men.
@Rakib: On the contrary it is the think tank in Congress that did not give MMS a free hand. UPA II unfortunately was a disaster both on domestic and foreign policy front in spite of having a better mandate than UPA I. Our foreign relations challenges was not just consigned to Pakistan. The big success we had with US relationship in UPA I was watered down during UPA II. Same is true with China.. Instead of blaming media and opposition the Congress party needs to introspect its own functioning.
@Gp65: I mentioned MM Singh's village with tongue partially in cheek. However, there are many instances where Modi & BJP at large had thrown hissy fits at every stage trying to prevent any talks with Pak. Where it couldn't turn ugly with anti-Pak invectives it egged on its partner Shiv Sena to do so under the garb of cricket. Modi was only a CM & it was out of form for him to comment on who PM hosted for lunch & what was the menu. But he won't understand such protocol. BJP was the pettiest Opposition India has seen, carping on food served to a visitor to one's shore! May be Congress will out-petty it now. Thus India grows old without growing up.
@Rakib: It was always the timing of when these stories of Mr. Singh wanted to visit Pakistan. The disingenuity of couching an official visit under the cover of a personal visit to home town also irked people. After all how many times did MMS visit his hometown before he became the PM?
@Rex Minor: Your sarcasm was misplaced. @Gurion is correct. The trigger for the riots was that 58 Hindu pilgrims were burnt. Alive at Godhra station by a mob of 2000 Muslims.
Further it is not just Muslims who died in the riots but Hindus also. Everyone who was killed in the riots is a ictim and their death is to be regretted since such wanton killing of each other cannot be justified. The notion however that the larger Musli community was a victim can be chalenged.
Lets hope for a better relations between these two hostile neighbours, India and Pakistan should restart a new chapter of friendly relations.
I agree, this was a very good decision to attend the oath taking ceremony
@Rex Minor: "@Gurion: Good point; riots are always initiated by the victims!" Brainless initiators always become victims!
Nawaz Sharif got great support from Pak Opposition, Media & obviously from Army for his decision to visit Delhi. Indian media too by & large was favourable to Modi's decision to invite. MM Singh however would have been taken to the cleaners by very same BJP & hawkish Media if he had even so much as expressed a desire to visit his village in Pak-Punjab! Pakistani politicians have demonstrated greater maturity.
@Gurion:
Good point; riots are always initiated by the victims!
Rex Minor
It's worth mentioning that the riots were initiated by only muslims.
judging the optimism expressed by rustum shah momand is indeed a good omen
considering he is a spokesman for PTI, and also an interlocutor from the government side with the taliban, it remains to be seen how much ground does pakistanis state lose to the the taliban for a peace deal to become effective ?
how would pakistan deal with the post taliban period - and post 2014 afghanistan?
will pakistan and india carry on with their proxy war in the afghan turf with deadly consequences on the entire subcontinent?
if modi-nawaaz meeting can step back from the brink and promise to promote peace and progress in afghanistan instead of conflict and confrontation - so much better for pakistan, india and the rest of the world. and afghanistan shall certainly benefit from peace between the two traditional arch rival nations
I guess the best way to work with Modi and India is to focus on economy. PM Nawaz Sharif needs to be credited for accepting the invitation. If the two leaders can agree on the following it would help both nations: 1) Accelerate economic co-operation 2) Agree that strong economic co-oeperation requires terror free environment and both countries should vow to respect each other sovereignity and would reign in strongly on any elements formenting terror in the region 3) Have understanding on each other legitimate interests in Afghanisthan and find common grounds to co-operate
Simultaneously, address some low hanging fruits like:
1) Given that Sir Creek is from the Gujarat region, resolve this issue to both countries satisfaction. Along with it come up with the mechanism to deal with fisherman straying into each other territories so not a single fisherman is put in jail going forward. 2) Allow cricket tours and IPL will follow automatically follow suit next year with the improved political situation
I think it was the right decision of Pakistan's prime minister to accept the invitation and attend the inaugural ceremony of Mr.Modi, only good will come out of this visit. I appreciate your reasoning for prime minister Nawaz Sharif to go and build up some kind of rapport with Indian prime minister Modi. Who knows they might just like each other and hit it on.
Nothing but good can come out of the Delhi meeting of PM Shareef and PM Modi.
I commend them both to be brave enough to challenge themselves to break out of the past practices and strictures, and try to start afresh on a new page. Bravo!
Wishing the entire Indian subcontinent all the best.
Timely and insightful piece of information
While I appreciate the hope in this article, I honestly do not share the author's optimism.
For starters, it is unknown just how much control MNS has over the army that has initiated four wars with India and which seems to be in firm grip of foreign policy as can be seen by the number of days it took MNS to accept the invitation.
Then there is the nagging problem with the strategic assets and just how much they are under the grip of the establishment.
The third problem is MNS himself who does not come across as a decisive person.
One of the authors on ET, Aakar Patel, had mentioned in one of his articles that Modi will not get into something that he cannot win (A win-win is of course one possible option). More than anyone else, Modi will know if there is any point at all engaging with MNS.
India poverty rate is 22%.
http://data.worldbank.org/country/india
Down from 51% in 1991. So, India has managed to halve its poverty in 20 or so years.
Relations with Pakistan are helpful, but its impact is grossly overestimated.
But, the opposite is not true. Relations with India will also determine relations with US, Afghanistan and other non-US NATO countries.
So, its in Pakistan's interest to start building bridges with India and act on Terrorists in Pakistan who are inimical to India's progress.