As expected, the BJP has registered a resounding victory in the Indian general elections. This means that Narendra Modi will be the new Indian prime minister. What does this mean for the India-Pakistan relationship? The safe bet is that tensions between the two countries will grow rather than shrink. Whether it is the violation of the ceasefire on the Line of Control, accusations of cross-border infiltration and terrorism or the proxy war that both countries fight in Afghanistan — chances are that the India-Pakistan rivalry will not subside but rather take centre stage.
Pakistan will not submit to the nature of uncontested Indian dominance and hegemony and will continue to try and balance against the build-up of Indian military power. Idealists want and desire that the character of the interstate relationship between the two regional rivals should change for good. This would require both countries to stop competing politically and militarily for the preservation of the ‘present order’, the foundations of which were laid by Partition and 1948, 1965, 1971 and the Kargil War. These wars have only diverted the time and resources of the two countries from the real issues that plague them. Realists would rather Pakistan focus more internally and first put its own house in order before contemplating the likely scenarios of a ‘win-win’ or ‘lose-lose’ relationship with a post-poll India.
In the ‘Modi India’, should we expect the old-fashioned enmity and distrust between the two countries to go away? Will there be a reorientation in the foreign policy of the two countries? It is being said that the history of the 21st century will be written largely in the Asia-Pacific region. Will the two countries engage each other positively on the economic and political fronts to draw benefits and rewards from the resurging Asia-Pacific region? Pakistan is weak and is fighting a battle for its survival. To survive, Pakistan not only has to fight terrorism as its arch-enemy but also has to compete with India.
A secular, liberal and open society like that of India is throwing huge ideological and cultural challenges for the Pakistani society to fight. If we are to compete against Indian political, military, economic and cultural hegemony, we will have to become like the Indians. Not in the true sense of their identity but in how they are evolving as a democracy and how they run their country. The latest example of that is the conduct and management of the biggest democratic elections on electronic machines that did away with the possibility of doubt, fraud and deceit. Compare this with not only what happened in the elections in Pakistan last year but what followed the polls. The election commission and the judicial commissions failed to act on the complaints of ‘electoral fraud’ by the political parties and street protests seem to be setting the stage for another political deadlock in the country. Unlike India, democracy in Pakistan has not reformed or improved the political and social structures, which is a failing on the part of our seasoned politicians, who only represent a status quo mindset devoid of any fresh ideas. Not many people in Pakistan doubt today that had the elections been conducted as fairly and freely as they were in India, most of the ‘non-delivering’ politicians and businessmen of a feudalistic mentality may never have returned to the assemblies. If the Congress could be routed in the Indian elections, could the fate of the two major political parties in Pakistan have been any different?
The X factor of the ‘Indian rise’ is the decision by Indians to jump onto the modernity bandwagon. The liberal, secular and the free Indian society draws favourable international response that is hugely conducive to its interest. While in Pakistan we are still being driven by a democratic order that moves too slowly and does nothing about roadblocks and obstacles such as lack of political reforms, openness and good governance. Take the example of the spread of polio and the two countries’ fight against it. Just five years ago, India accounted for nearly half of the world’s infections. But this year in March, India was declared polio free. In Pakistan, we had six cases of polio in the same period in 2013. We have 59 cases now and restrictions on travel abroad without polio vaccine certification. At the heart of the matter is the lack of political will and poor leadership. For 12 months, this government has dilly-dallied with the possibility of initiating a military operation in North Waziristan.
Talking to terrorists has only been a method to gain time and avoid confrontation. The leadership seems to be too afraid of a blow back that an operation against the Taliban stronghold could bring to the heartland of the country. Such a defeatist mindset can only cause a prevalence of polio (56 of the 59 cases from Waziristan) and ‘reform bankruptcy’.
Today we face a stark choice. We can cling on to our nuclear weapons, proxy wars, gun-toting terrorists and jihadi organisations and feel like a military, political and social giant in the Asia-Pacific region or realise that without quick therapy and ‘internal reforms’ we will remain the regional pygmies that will continue to sit on the shores of the global sea of economic benefits, partnerships and alliances. Sitting on the margins of the world economy, the only tides of benefit that will consistently reach our shores will be from the IMF and the World Bank.
Courtesy and thanks to the nuclear weapons and the logic of mutually assured destruction there are limited chances of another conventional war between India and Pakistan. If India can reduce its offensive military capability on Pakistan’s borders, it can send the right signals to Pakistan assuring it that it has no plans of attacking it. With risks of war reduced, Pakistan would stop attempts to balance the scales against India and would more effectively re-balance against the original threat from inside.
It is hoped that the post-election India will make a new beginning with Pakistan based on the norms of state sovereignty and non-intervention. Considering the role Indians played in the dismemberment of Pakistan, protecting its independence and sovereignty should be its number one worry. Thus, the grand vision of an ‘alternative India-Pakistan order’ based on economics, commerce and trade cannot be a substitute for the huge geopolitical and military insecurities that Pakistan suffers vis-a-vis India.
If there ever will be a grand strategic South Asia initiative, it would require a joint political will that should push ‘transformational diplomacy’ to take root. The objective of such diplomacy can only be one — get the two nations to sit together, talk and resolve all their issues.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 26th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (64)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@jun: "Will India ban now recruitment of minorities in army and civil bureaucracy ?"
What is wrong with you? DO you know that 3 out of 5 women in Modi's cabinet are minorities? Or are you simply trolling?
And before you ask - Indian cricket team, Bollywood, Indian industry all will be as reflective of India's diversity in future as they have in the past.
Will India ban now recruitment of minorities in army and civil bureaucracy ?
@jun: Your ignorance has no limits. 70% of Indians eat meat. It is typically Jains and Hindu Brahmins and Baniyas that traditionally are vegetarian. This too is not uniform throughout the country. In Bengal for instance Brahmins too eat fish.
Besides as @Rakib and i have already mentioned, there is no proposal to change the secular character of India. Further you have your Islamic state - right? Do not worry aout whether India is secular or a Hindu nation.
will India ban serving meat in restaurants now ?
@Gul: " Boycott India " is a very good idea. The what?
@jun: Answer is "No". Main constituent in the new ruling combine is BJP, a party that has neither in its manifesto nor in its pronouncements has ever promised Hindu State. That is certainly not their intention. And Modi is not an "extremist". Please do not bestow a disguised compliment on BJP by such undeserved criticism.
@Komal S: The local language media asked questions initially as all media should but did not continue that tirade even after answers absolving Modi of complicity were in public domain.
@jun: Not even BJP or Modi have proposed that India is for Hindus alone. They swear by the secular constitution.
In any case ou have your Islamic republic right? Why do you care whether India is secular or not?
@Rex Minor: i have never justified Babri demolition because i believe that the issue of Ram Janmabhoomi shold be resoved through constitutional means. I was simply trying to put things in perspective and challenging your wild far fetched theories of how India will be isolated and sanctioned because a derelict mosque was demolished 22 years back - an event with which Modi had litle to do. If at all such sanctions were to envisioned, they would have occurred during 1998 when NDA first came to power.
Reading these comments makes one thing clear, Indians at obsessed with Pakistan.
@jun: Indian constitution is the copy of the French constitution, its laws are from the colonial times, and none are effective, since it is the culture of people which nourishes the soul of democracy.
Rex Minor..
Will Indians change their constitution now from secular to Hindu India .Majority of Indians want Hindu India as depicted in their selection of extremist PM
@Rafi Ka Deewana:
You forgot to mention Sir, the KPK and Baluchistan are separating as well, leaving Punjab and Rajistan to come together.
Rex Minor
@Gp65:
Derilect mosque? Only the devil's advocate will defend an evil act; the once military Tsar of Pakistan did the same and tried to relatavise it as well, and was last tice. seen hding in the medics quarters. Not only Hindutwa high priest, but congress and the judiciary are all complicit in the indiscriminate murders of Indian citizens. Mr Modi has choosen science in his defence and the court upheld it, the action of one for self protection against the crowd who broke into muslim houses, is a travesty of justice. No European can or will condone this act and I am sure not even the justice of your adopted land will. Apologise, he definitely will and publicly as well to the loved ones of the victims!!.
Rex Minor
@ jun: “strange how can a secular , liberal and open society elect a govt through vote which is extremist , conservative and closed” strange that a Citizen of ISLAMIC republic of Pakistan,being ruled by a party called MUSLIM league is gallant enough to ask such question.
@Gp65: says " he did not bend to the chorus of English media in India asking him to apologize"
Sorry the whole of Indian media, english or otherwise did not spare him. The reason i bring this up is unlike pakistan the Indian vernacular media is as liberal if not more than the English media.
ISI is the main obstacle for Pakistan to normalize the relation with INDIA.
@jun: Which party is not Rightist in Pakistan as a non-rightist party in Pakistan if ever existed would have rejected Pakistan's theocraticl basis.............BJP is a counterpart to PML-N not your JUI.....They are communal not fundamentalist
What I find awkard are few things about Pakistanis :
1)You a smaller country are more interested in our events & believe in being judgemental than we in yours. 2) Around 61% Indians (out of which majority are again Hindus) who voted did not BJP ... do some research you'll know & many who did it out of strong hatred towards Congress ...study the events going on in India before elections ...Why should any Indian secular or not , vote for a corrupt-Socialist party btw we let it rule us for 10 years
3) Do we Indians atleast the liberal ones need to prove ourselves to a COMMUNAL STATE like Pakistan....a nation that was never anything else but theocracy. So who are you for us to prove our credentials to.
4)We never competed with you .....for majority of Indians especially Eastern & South Indians both Hindus & Muslims , Pakistan is as good as non-existent.....for many in West India , like Rajasthan, Punjab & Himachal ,it is still a news only when a terrorist strike takes place
5) You oppose Modi -a Hindu Rightist for India but hail PML_N & PTI -Muslim Rightists again , for your country.................Why this Hypocricy
6) You wear Religion as your primary identity but expect us to take the extreme step of renouncing our identity
So just chill
Lieutenant Colonel (R) By Muhammad Ali Ehsan : If India can reduce its offensive military capability on Pakistan’s borders, it can send the right signals to Pakistan assuring it that it has no plans of attacking it. With risks of war reduced, Pakistan would stop attempts to balance the scales against India and would more effectively re-balance against the original threat from inside. . Au contraire mon ami! . With the number of Terrorist - of Pakistani Origin but by Pakistan the so-called "Non-State Actors" India is Forced to station its "your called offensive" but in fact "an absolute necessity" for India to guard and secure its Border with Pakistan - Attacks as also the Border Cease fire Violations by the Pakistani Security Forces it will not be correct for India to reduce its Forces on the India-Pakistan Border. . The reason why Pakistan's Annual Defence Budget Spending is considered high is that Pakistan is trying to be Equal to India in its Defence Capacity and Capability. This it cannot do as it is having a negative effect on Pakistan's Development, Economic, Financial and Welfare etc. Sectors due to Pakistan's Annual Defence Budget, including Pensions and Nuclear Development & Armament cost etc. is to the Tune of possibly US$ 10 Billion. This amount is ONE FOURTH THAT OF INDIA whereas the Indian Economy is about NINE TO TEN Times that of Pakistan. Herein lies the problem. . Up to now all Four India-Pakistan Wars have been started by Pakistan and as such Historically as well as for its own Economic and Financial gain it is for Pakistan to reduce its Annual Defence Budget Spending to, say, ONE EIGHT that of India which will be a pointer to the Indian Establishment that Pakistan has changed its "Offensive" Strategy to a "Defensive" one thereby a possible reduction of the Indian Annual Defence Budget. . Cheers
@jun: My dear, even right wing in India agrees o secular constitution. Even left wing in Pakistan agrees to a constitution that discrimnates against minorities, intolerance is mainstream not an extreme position.
@jun: My dear, even right wing in India agrees o secular constitution. Even left wing in Pakistan agrees to a constitution that discrimnates against minorities, intolerance is mainstream not an extreme position.
@jun: Yes there have been Hindu Muslim riots in India where both sides killed themselves. Fortunately frequency and intensity of those has reduced as time passes. In Pakistan though Muslims kill minorities who are unwilling to convert. So they are massacre pure and simple, not rios.
@Rex Minor: One derelict mosque was destroyed in India 22 years back. It should not have been. In any case Modi had nothing o do with it. Plus more mosques have been destroyed in Pakistan. Plus Gulf countries imposing sanctions on India - ha. Also what is there to clarify about Gujarat 2002? It was a riot and very unfortunate. The Indian courts have certified Modi was not complicit. modi did not bend to international ressure and apologize since his conscience was clear at a time when US and West boycotted him, he did not bend to the chorus of English media in India asking him to apologize - saying if I am guilty, apology is not enough, i should be punished and if I am innocent , it is unfair o ask me to apologize. So if ou expect hat he is ow going to apologize after becoming PM of India, ou are simply hallucinating.
You achieve what is important to you. Pakistani's main choice has been an Arab-type Islamic country, and they are getting there. Minorities are gone. Bengalis are gone.
Indians give more importance to economy and science / technology, and they are getting that.
Pakistan will become a modern and advance country as soon as the country sets its priorities right. They have the means and resources. Just the mindset they need.
@Rex, Saudis can do only two things 1)herding camels 2)selling crude. They have understood that the latter is more profitable. When Iran-USA conflicts comes to an end, India and possibly China too will start buying more of their oil from Iran (because of proximity reasons). Just watch how your Saudi king will come running to India without even minding his pants coming down. 'Sanctions from Saudis' is very amusing expression indeed.
Besides, we invited Mr.Sharif on our own; Saudis are not sending him to India as their messenger like USA sends low level career bureaucrats to Pakistan to convey a message or two to its (Pakistan's) PM and COAS.
Pakistan should shun the vision of strategic depth,,,this is the only solution of many of its problems
Dipak@Rex Minor: Keep on dreaming. Modi does not need to do anything. He has no war with any of them. Nor he wants to build Ram temple over Black Stone in Saudi Arabia. Peace, Peace and Peace only.
"Pakistan will not submit to the nature of uncontested Indian dominance and hegemony and will continue to try and balance against the build-up of Indian military power”.
Everything you don’t agree with is not hegemony
"A secular, liberal and open society like that of India is throwing huge ideological and cultural challenges for the Pakistani society to fight”.
Why is this anyone else’s problem other than Pakistan’s
"Courtesy and thanks to the nuclear weapons and the logic of mutually assured destruction there are limited chances of another conventional war between India and Pakistan”.
A foolish belief held by Pakistan that the nuclear weapon is the sole source of its security. Neither India nor Pakistan will use it ever. Doing so will be insane and assured mutual destruction. Yes, as Bhutto said, Pakistani’s will eat grass to make nukes has come true literally and poetically and it is time to revisit, first by brining Pakistan’s military establishment under civilian control.
No, Pakistan’s economy can never be as large as India due to its size and multiculturalism. Instead of competing, try cooperating for change and everyone in the region will benefit.
not a single time religious extremist parties have won majority in Pakistan parliament but India has religious extremist government through voting .Means extremism is a minority in Pakistan and majority in Hindu India
Hindu Muslim riots already started in Hindu India
Religious extremist is a bad thing for South Asia and unfortunately Indians Hindus are on the way of religious extremism by electing Narendar Modi , a leader of Indian Hindus only
"To survive, Pakistan not only has to fight terrorism as its arch-enemy but also has to compete with India."
I wonder why is it so.
@ModiFied: I disagree with you. Kashmir has to do with control of water resources nothing to do with Two Nation Theory. It is the Muslims who have to decided whether they believe in two nation theory or not. Most of the Indian Muslims believe in it and Congress always supported their feeling inside India by appeasing them. It was Nehru and Sardar who accepted two nation theory.
@ jun: "strange how can a secular , liberal and open society elect a govt through vote which is extremist , conservative and closed" We Indians are very very sorry not to have chosen a government of your liking. I wish my country people had listened to your sage advice which, I am confident,was passed on to you by your leaders sitting in the cool climes of north-waziristan. please feel free to tell us how to conduct our foreign policy and run our economy.we are eagerly awaiting pearls of wisdom to drop from you lips.
@Dipak
Mr Nawaz Sharif will convey to Mr Modi about the demands of the House of Saud, who along with the Gulf countries will introduce sanctions regime against India in case Mr Modi does not publicly clarify his role in the carnage of Indian muslims and the destruction of their mosques. The first 100 days are a plenty of time for deliberation.
Rex Minor
@Weirdity: st time that
Let the author of the article comment on your question. This is not the first time that Nawaz Sharif has sailed against the wind. .
Rex Minor
India is not a secular country yet. It is defined as a religious state. Uniform Civil Code is not implemented yet.
All of Pakistan's internal and external problems are the results of the actions of 3 countries: India, Israel, and the US. Pakistan's economy has been reduced to shambles due to the political machinations of foreigners, and the Pakistani people have to suffer the results of these proxy wars.
Democracy is a farce used by foreign countries to rule and control Pakistan's politicians by proxy. What has a democratic Zardari or democratic Nawaz done for this country except surrender our sovereignty? Unfortunately some of our military rulers also were in the hands of foreign powers like Musharraf.
Pakistan's only future comes from Islamic solidarity, just economic practices, and elimination of racism planted by foreign-backed politicians to pit Pakistanis against each other.
I support Pakistan, my ancestors fought and died to keep this country safe. I would never forsake my country for anything. I believe it is a trust from God Almighty. Pakistanis, be proud of who you are.
@Rex Minor: Are you by any chance saying that Nawaz Sherifs plane from India to Islamabad will not be allowed to land in Pakistan?
Dipak@Rex Minor: Keep on dreaming.
For long, I was expecting someone advising Pakistanis to become like "India" interms of institution building and bringing "X factor" like what Indians have, as the author has pointed out. This will have positive cascading effect finally resulting in the emergence of a secular, democratic republic of Pakistan. This is "mother of all solutions" to all the problems that ails Pakistan and the region. If Pakistan can embrace "nuclear bomb" which is a result of modern science, it can also embrace "secularism" the "X factor" which governs modern societies these days.
This article proves beyond any reasonable doubt that Pakistan does not know what is wrong with it. The writer seems to be suggesting that India should change enough to let Pakistan reduce its expenditure on the expensive toys.
Unless Pakistan realises that it cannot compete with India, and that any competition is absolutely unnecessary, it will not be able to stop its downward slide into oblivion.
@Harkol your last para. The wanted extremist person we had to free from our jail to Afghanistan, for these outfits to release our citizen after killing few, safe and sound to india was found four months back giving lecture on tv in azad kashmir against india. When the Pakistani FO was questioned on this one of worlds wanted man, she said its a one time event don't pay much heed to it and dismissed it like its nothing. Just like mumbai guy roaming free there. So there you have proof who was actually behind it. And instead of catching them, Defending them like OBL was priority to them.
@kleptar -8B what we say are backed by proofs live caught persons confession,phone records tapes. Other example I just wrote above. While yours is assumption,speculation and theories where is the proofs?live person,tapes? nothing shown on media or to us. This is the fake bogie just to justify their actions against us and distract the public from general issue.
@kolsat yes and those Muslims weren't Pakistanis. The country wasn't even born then. Secondly if you punjabi,sindi,balochi,Gujarati etc etc have sizeable Hindu,Christian population then, there forefathers were converts/forced converts and were themselves ruled by foreign invaders whose ethnic language was different and invaded india (that is today's modern day pakistan and half of india today) so we never think of it the other flawed way like you do nor is our enmity regarding it is with you but original invaders as you suffered more than us with religious onslaught.
@jun:
"strange how can a secular , liberal and open society elect a govt through vote which is extremist , conservative and closed"
What is extremist, conservative and what the heck is closed about Modi?
Why don't you point out each of his agendas which you consider to be extremist, conservative or closed, so we can reply.
ET Moderators: Don't know why my comments get purged. I never post anything that is inflammatory or against propriety.
Here is what Pakistan can expect from India.
It can count on India to never to start a war on its own. It never has, never will. However, BJP may have a lower threshold to retaliate in case an terror attack is made on India. The retaliation may not be a war, but it may not be silent suffering either.
India will not give an inch of Kashmir. It won't matter if Indian Muslim League is in power, but, Indian public opinion won't permit a Muslim majority area succeeding any more. We have had one partition and elimination of Hindu minorities and that's enough.
India will want to extend relationship with Pakistan based on mutual benefit - like trade. India has no delusions that we will be friends, but most politicians in India think we can do business, as long as attacks do not happen on Indian soil.
India will work on strengthening moderate govt. in Afghanistan so it doesn't revert back to the Taliban. It had a bitter experience in 2000, with Khandhar hijack, where hijackers flew the plain to Afhgan territory. India doesn't want a terror controlled territory again. In this, it's interests are aligned with that of USA.
India will try and grow economically. Indian people have spoken very clearly that what they won't tolerate is a sub-par performance in economy. In the recent elections, that was the biggest issue and any govt. will be foolish to ignore it. China has left India behind and India wants to catch up.
This has an implication to Pakistan/Bangladesh - Focus on growth or be left way behind.
The former military man is not mincing words; the message is clear. If the Prime Minister attends the coronation of the India High Priest, Pakistan military Turks will move and remove the elected Prime Minister?
Rex Minor.
Not matter the analysis, the conclusion by Pakistani people is for India to do this or that to 'help' them. Why can't Pakistan take responsibility for what it is and wants to be. Pakistan wants to be treated as an equal but then asks for India to be large hearted! Why can't Pakistan have a strong Election commission? That has. Itching to do with India.
India has never had any interest in Pakistan territory. Though Pakistani textbooks teach differently, all four wars with India were provoked by Pakistan and informed opinion in Pakistan agrees that Pakistan was the aggressor.
All four wars were characterized by hubris on the part of Pakistani military and rulers where they were misinformed or miscalculated the strengths of Pakistani military (1 muslim soldier = 10 others), we have American weapons or Americans will support us.
India has always been a status quo power and it has returned Pakistani territory captured in each of the wars. Support for making LOC into international border is strong within India.
The troops build up on the border reflects the reality of Pakistani provocation. India has learnt its history lesson that Pakistan is not to be trusted, particularly after the Kargil war and the terrorist bombing incidents where the civilian establishment had no idea what the military and the intelligence services were up to.
Pakistan has to start behaving like a good neighbor and prove itself trustworthy. India will respond when it is convinced that Pakistan has renounced it's old ways and turned a corner. Right now, there is no evidence that is happening any time soon so don't expect miracles.
@Author: Overall a well balanced article. I wanted to provide the Indian perspective about Indian soldiers amassed at the LOC and border. the army at LOC and border was never there yntil the 90s when India was forced to place it there in response to the now openly acknowledged policy of bleed India by a thousand cuts using newly jobless Afghan jihadis which peaked with attacked on our parliament while it was in session. Essentially it is there for defensive purposes NOT offensive reasonsNow. With the LeT camps flourishing and JeM openly raising funds despite being istensibly banned and the US drawdown in Afghanistan approaching, it would be quite irresponsible of any Indian parliament to withdraw the soldiers who are stationed there despite great expense to avoid infiltration and of course situations like Kargill where the winter withdrawal of troops was utilised by Pakistan to occupy Kargill.
I agree that this expense benefits no one and the money if diverted to welfare would be helpful in social development. However after 1962 when the defense expenses had been greatly reduced and India fared so poorly against China, India has learnt its lesson hat army must be adequate to address existing known threats. Accordingly, ithe forst steps must be taken by Pakistan by dismantling the terror camps to enable India to reduce number of soldiers at LOC.
@jun: You determined that this. Government is extremist, conservative and closed - how? It is the track record of NDA governments in the states and specifically of BJP government in Gujarat that won endorsement. Indians wanted growth and development and rejected dynasty and corruption.
Dipak@Gul: If India boycotts Pakistan then you guys will never come out of Stone Age. Best luck.
Muslims should forget that they ruled India years ago and stop the enmity toward India. It is to Pakistan's disadvantage to compete with India because it is a smaller nation in economic terms. Pakistan should cooperate with India to help their economy.
@Gul: as it is today Pakistan has very little to do with India except for sending the likes of Kasab and giving sanctuary to Dawood. If you boycott India we will be saved from your such actions.
Enough is enough. Pakistan and India must stop hurting each other for the well being of Aam Adami.
@ author. How can india scale down its guard at the boders to appease pakistan. Let pakistan first put a lid on its non state actors and every thing will fall in its place.
@ jun @ gul. Strange. Why should we prove our secularism to people of a communal country. It is like devile quoting the scriptures. Prove your credentials first and then comment. Yes please boycott India. Also do ask your non state actors to boycott us.
@jun that's the beauty of liberal democracy they vote on economic performance,governance,gdp etc not based on his religion,race,creed.
@author even if you make peace with india, we won't stop growing politically, economically or militarily because we weren't competing with you in the first place like you assume. If we were, we would have stopped long back because we were enough vis via you. Pakistan is not even blip on radar to us. It's more of china threat till it increases it's militarily and claims Tibet and our Arunachal Pradesh, we will invest in our own army to protect our borders. As far as us backing off our army from loc, that's not possible until you recognise it as international border or sign agreement you don't do another kargil type adventure. Till then we have no option but to guard loc against mercurial neighbour who have habit of doing peace deal from one hand and war from the other."Dismemberment of Pakistan" no one is responsible but your own country for the break. suppressing their language,culture, transferring profits to east.. had your leaders not done that you would have been one country. Btw that war was started by Pakistan too. Last not the least what's happening in Baluchistan is same. If you paid heed to them and their problems you wudnt have been facing what you face today. Yet you close eyes to their problems like ostrich in sand and blame in on others - USA,india,Israel.
@jun that's the beauty of liberal democracy they vote on economic performance,governance,gdp etc not based on his religion,race,creed.
@author even if you make peace with india, we won't stop growing politically, economically or militarily because we weren't competing with you in the first place like you assume. If we were, we would have stopped long back because we were enough vis via you. Pakistan is not even blip on radar to us. It's more of china threat till it increases it's militarily and claims Tibet and our Arunachal Pradesh, we will invest in our own army to protect our borders. As far as us backing off our army from loc, that's not possible until you recognise it as international border or sign agreement you don't do another kargil type adventure. Till then we have no option but to guard loc against mercurial neighbour who have habit of doing peace deal from one hand and war from the other."Dismemberment of Pakistan" no one is responsible but your own country for the break. suppressing their language,culture, transferring profits to east.. had your leaders not done that you would have been one country. Btw that war was started by Pakistan too. Last not the least what's happening in Baluchistan is same if you paid heed to them and their problems you wudnt have been facing what you face today. Yet you close eyes to their problems like ostrich in sand and blame in on USA,india,Israel.
Excellent write up.. Couple of questions that arise.
"If India can reduce its offensive military capability on Pakistan’s borders, it can send the right signals to Pakistan assuring it that it has no plans of attacking it. "
I was under the impression that the wars you mention, 48, 65 and Kargill were all initiated by us. We are still sorting out exactly who started the 1971 and got the majority to secede. Given that who needs reassuring really that adventures will not begin again. India is status quo, is it not us who want a change in Kashmir status?
There was no mention of our Mullah Brigade who swears that they will never rest till our Crescent and Star is not flying victoriously over Lal Kila of the Mughals. Are they important to consider or should they be neglected as done in the write up.
"If India can reduce its offensive military capability on Pakistan’s borders, it can send the right signals to Pakistan assuring it that it has no plans of attacking it."
Did India ever attack Pakistan in past ? Wasn't it opposite all the time? Most of the contradictions are in Pakistan itself and not outside. Problem is simple. Pakistan believes in two nation theory and India doesn't. So called core issue of Kashmir is the byproduct of two nation theory and this is why India and Pakistan have diametrically opposite views. Only practical solution is to recognize the LOC as international border. Also Pakistan should stop becoming self appointed leader of Muslim world as Muslims outside don't like that.
South Asia is more than India and Pakistan. Military insecurities that Pakistan suffers is its own creation. All the military conflicts were undertaken by Pakistan. This has been acknowledged many Pakistani commentators and analysts. In 1971 Pakistan presented India with a golden opportunity. However, Pakistani military still seeks parity with India! This is depriving average Pakistanis to prosper as more than 60% of its budget goes to military and servicing debt. The elected politicians have little money to spend on socio-economic needs during their limited tenure. I hope there are no military tensions between the two countries. The best way to compete is on economic areas. Both Sri Lanka and Bangladesh are doing much better economically than Pakistan with limited resources.
Good governance is badly lacking in Pakistan and it does not require any foreign aid. Proper education (does not require much capital outlay) is key to reducing terrorism. Now becoming Arab is seen as a Panacea.
Both India and Pakistan does need not rulers - we need good governance.
If you become like Indians then the TNT market place will come crashing down resulting in a massive job loss for pompous and all knowing opinion makers that work for this and other publications. Think of the massive unemployment that will create!!! Think of the dozens of editorials in progress that will have to be abandoned!!! It will be a carnage (of ideas) unlike anything this part of the world has not seen since the Partition.
I find it fascinating that Pakistanis remember the 'dismemberment' of Pakistan so vividly, but they don't remember the dismemberment of India with as much enthusiasm. Neither West Pakistan nor East Pakistan (today Bangladesh) lost land to India of significant value. India has been more than accommodating to Pakistan by not completely dismembering the remainder of Pakistan, nor for asking anything in return of the 90000 POWs captured in the war who under the circumstances should have been tried for war crimes. Yet, these are all lost in the memory of the Pakistani Punjabi, who feels that after growing by over six multiples since 1947, thinks he should be rewarded with Kashmir, which he feels belongs to him and him only. The reason there is no 'core issue' of Sindh or Baluchistan to "resolve" is that the Pakistani population and military resorted to extreme means to quell dissent and reduce to insignificance demographically and militarily anyone who stood in the way. Is Pakistan prepared to cede any land in any dispute with India? The answer seems to be no. The "core issue" is really the Islamic supremacism promoted by the Punjabis of Pakistan in order to expand their territory. That is what needs to be discussed. Leave the poor Kashmiris alone.
Boycott India.