But while that is for the South Asian governments to figure out, the focus of the 69 per cent of the electorate who voted for political parties other than the BJP is shifting to why the opposition was decimated in these polls. And it is becoming increasingly clear that most of these parties had actually factored themselves out of the elections long before the polling day, except they are too alienated now from the people to realise it.
The three regional parties that have done exceedingly well are Tamil Nadu’s AIADMK under Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, West Bengal’s Trinamool Congress under Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and Orissa’s Biju Janata Dal under Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik. Between them they have secured over 90 Lok Sabha seats and were able to stem the Modi wave to retain complete hold on their constituents.
Perhaps, the answer to the question in the second paragraph can be found to some extent in the excellent performance of these three regional parties. They have been running responsive governments, they have been active in the field, they have countered other political offensives with vigour and zeal, and they have managed to convince the people through a blend of decent governance and ground activity that they can be trusted to carry forward the aspirations of their constituents to parliament as well.
The anger against the Congress party was the first reality of this election, as it swept the country. The arrogance and the inability to make amends, hit the voters in almost all the states. Modi was amongst the first to realise this, and over a year ago began a campaign against the Congress. The media and the support from the corporates was just an enabling factor, in that it helped him project himself as a major alternative to the old party that completely failed the people on all issues, be it governance, security (internal and external), development, social justice and equity. In the process, the searching electorate could only see Modi wherever it looked, and except for the above states, shifted allegiance to the BJP in the final stages of the polls in the hope that its aspirations for jobs, development and progress would be met by the person they perceive as a ‘strong leader’.
The second reality of the election was the ‘Congress-isation’ of the other parties. The dynasties, the arrogance, the corruption, the more than ever reliance on ‘there is no other alternative’ factor, the taking-for-granted of communities and castes (where will they go, they cannot go anywhere approach), all came together in a potent mix for the frustrated voters who decided to shift allegiance and make it clear that they could no longer be taken for granted. The vote banks, nurtured with lies and not policies, slipped away with political leaders like Lalu Yadav, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Mayawati catatonic in their responses.
The Left, too, has been hit hard, with its rigid leadership and its inability to change to the new circumstances placing it on the fringes of polity today, not looking in, but looking out. The Left’s failure to learn from the last West Bengal defeat, and overhaul its organisation into a more responsive and youthful body, has been a major reason for its continuous marginalisation.
The third reality of the election was Modi himself. He has proven to be a master strategist besides being a good orator and a workaholic, which places him ahead of all the leaders who have all become used to the good life and vote banks that are going nowhere. He was not complacent and walked the extra miles to woo the people into his fold. He has succeeded to a point where the opposition is virtually demolished and for the first time in independent India’s history, there is no one party with sufficient numbers to lead the opposition in the Lok Sabha.
The BJP and the RSS are working full time to get the government’s act together, but again the same sense of urgency is completely missing in the opposition. Except for Janata Dal(U) leader Nitish Kumar who has shown the calibre to take stock and learn from these elections, the Left has still to meet and the Congress that has met has only reaffirmed faith in the dynasty that has led it to its ruin in the first place.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 24th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Anil: NDA got 40% of the ote share. Plus in a multiparty system, by design the winning party will not have majority of votes, moving o proportional representation will increase gridlock and horse trading iand is highly undesirable.
Rightly said about Congress. They can't get enough of the dynasty (Rahul). And Rahul sits in the back bench in that meeting. Wants to take credit for every thing, but will run away from defeat.
The whole article can aptly be summerized as Khisiani Mulli Khaba Noche.
Only 31% voted for the bjp, 69% didn't vote for it by that logic congress and upa allies were rejected by 80% of the people. Some people like the author will never learn.
@author
Despite your rather dispassionate analysis, you will find that many of your Modi-loving compatriots commenting here expect nothing less than slavish praise of their demigod from you. And nothing less than licking his boots will earn you any points. Talk about blind following!
@Strategic Asset: Completely disagree with you. NOTA polled less than a million votes out of 550 million who voted. its true that for first time in global history, that someone with 31% votes gets an absolute majority. Its time India moved to proportional representational system. Its a shame that with 4.2% national Votes, the third highest after BJP and Congress, Mayawati got no seats. Its even more shameful that with 3.5% votes, jayalaitha is the third largest party in Parliament. Modi has indeed hit the nail on the head of an aspirational new , young generation by promising jobs, jobs an more jobs >If he delivers, he will get re-elected. If he doesn't, India will look at the next messiah. Seema is right. 69% indeed did not vote for BJP, and 63% did not vote for NDA.
69% opposition really?
And how'd you figure that? 31% was polled by BJP, another 8+% by NDA partners making it 40%. Of the 60% who voted, a lot of them voted for folks who have assured support to NDA - like BJD, YSR and ADMK.
So, where is the 'majority' opposition.
Author and her ilk let their bias cloud their judgement. Even Nehru/Indira/Rajiv had 55-60% not voting for them, and that never bothered these 'intellectuals'. Some intellect!
The three regional parties did well not because of any special thing but only because these region are still not well connected with rest of India (specially the rural areas). It is only matter of time before these parties will also facing the heat. Most vulnarable is TMC because so far they have not delivered anyting other than rehoteric. I am pretty sure after 5 years you will see BJP poll percentage going up.
Ms Mufti - when you talk of dynasty politics - please don't forget your comrades the Abdullah's and how they were decimated too in their home state. What a sore looser.
one of the potent cause of failure of other parties against Modi has been the breaking of caste barriers.even if we look at the three state parties who won in this election,they don't indulge in identity politics in a massive way.Modi exploited the voter's fatigue with caste politics and he is sure to make it a matter of yesteryears in coming days.
In her haste to show that neither Modi nor his party are really the winners Mustafa tells us three parties won all their seats and Modi's party did not in those areas. What she forgets is that BJP is a national party where as the parties led by Jayalalitha, Bannerjee and patnaik are regional parties who always fight elections on regional issues. Mustafa should get over Modi's win and move on. He is here to stay for at least the next five years and all surrounding nations have to get used to it and cooperate with him and not create trouble as Pkistan seems to have done Herat.
The funding and backing from international corporations was THE DECIDING FACTOR that helped Modi win.
Maa'm, I'm a huge fan of your work and look forward to your writing. Please keep writing and thanks for not being a part of any 'wave' (whether it's saffron or not doesn't matter)
You can fool some of the people all the time, all the people some of the time, but not all the people all the time. At times the voter gives a helping hand, when peeved uses his foot to vote.This is only the first step in socialization of the electorate. The identity politics of caste, language and religion is slowly being demolished and those who made a living from marketing fear and insecurity may have to search a new profession. It is a new India, a young India and a fearless India on the march and those not connecting to this new reality, will be rejected by the masses.
The election results in India is a big slap on the face of the Modi bashers ... both in India and abroad ... !! ... the people of India made sure that Muslim appeasing vote bank seeking political parties be taught a lesson ... now West Bengal is in BJP's focus, where the people are angry and ready to go with BJP ... but BJP has insufficient or no organizational presence there as of now ... !!
Ma'm you are incorrect that for the first time in independent India no party is large enough to have a leader of opposition this happened during the first 3 elections when Nehru was the Congress leader and it was also the case in 1984 elections.
One more thing: most of the factors for BJP victory that you stated are true. But you missed an important factor i.e. the migrant labourer from UP, Bihar, Jharkhand, etc. that went to Gujarat to work, saw the peace and progress in Gujarat villages (24x7 electricity in every illage, a school with teacher in every village, an ambulance that would reach in 11 minutes in every village, a trauma center within 7 kilometres radius for every village, no riots- not even a curfew in past 12 years) and wanted the same for their own villages.
Seema, for the first time you have missed Modi bashing ... :-)
I appalled with the analysis...especially where the author says Modi was enabled by media. When in reality, no matter how much Modi tried to talk about governance, everyone in media was only concerned about 2002. Once he was cleared by Supreme Court, then media started singing the apology chorus. There's failure of UPA governance - Godhra...there's corruption - why can you not just apologize....
2002 riots was the answer and question to every issue that was raised by Modi. It was media that was carrying water for UPA.
@Author: Let's dissect your statements one by one.
But while that is for the South Asian governments to figure out, the focus of the 69 per cent of the electorate who voted for political parties other than the BJP is shifting to why the opposition was decimated in these polls.
Hate to admit it, but I did not vote for the BJP (instead voted NOTA) only due to the fact that the local MP (Ananth Kumar from Bangalore South) is as useless as I have seen in all my years in Bangalore. If it was anyone else, I would have certainly voted BJP. Don't count me in your 69%.
The three regional parties that have done exceedingly well are Tamil Nadu’s AIADMK under Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, West Bengal’s Trinamool Congress under Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and Orissa’s Biju Janata Dal under Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik.
2 out of the 3, leaving Mamata's TMC, already support BJP or have a tacit understanding with BJP. Mamata is a loose cannon and the only thing keepiing her alive is the massive deterioration of the traditional left.
The third reality of the election was Modi himself. He has proven to be a master strategist besides being a good orator and a workaholic, which places him ahead of all the leaders who have all become used to the good life and vote banks that are going nowhere.
Modi has been more than what i expected him to be. Even before he has become PM, I am very impressed by him in more ways than one. Here on ET, you will find more than one Indian who has changed his/her mind about Modi. How come you haven't?
Except for Janata Dal(U) leader Nitish Kumar who has shown the calibre to take stock and learn from these elections, the Left has still to meet and the Congress that has met has only reaffirmed faith in the dynasty that has led it to its ruin in the first place.
JD (U) is a spent force. 2 out of 40 means exactly what it is. Nitish Kumar paid the price for his ambition. Time for him to lick his wounds instead.