I attended the ceremony at Yadgar-e-Shuhada in Lahore where thousands of people including the families of Shuhada as well as serving and retired officers of the armed forces, parliamentarians, media and civil society members sat spellbound for more than three hours witnessing the tales of heroism and experiencing the rejuvenation of a new spirit that we as a nation needed so badly. It was, indeed, a solemn occasion not only acknowledging the supreme sacrifices given by our martyrs but also sharing with the families of Shuhada their sense of pride and fortitude. The experience touched every soul and made every eye tearful.
The scene of a Pakistan-bound refugee-packed train in a documentary film took me back subconsciously to the fateful train journey that my family (I was only a small child then) undertook in 1947 while migrating from India to the newly-created state of Pakistan leaving behind millions of others, their hearths and homes, their landed properties and their ancestral history of thousands of years to submerge into a new larger national identity. No sacrifice then was greater than freedom. No wonder, for my family as indeed for millions of others, it was a momentous decision to opt for Pakistan.
Memories of many scary moments and painful experiences from those days are still seared into my mind. I cannot forget the moments when our train, after crossing into Pakistan, steamed into Harbanspura Railway Station with everyone on the train crying with joy and raising spontaneous slogans “Allah-o-Akbar” and “Pakistan Zindabad”. At that crucial juncture in our life, as our three-month long journey ended, tears of joy filled every eye at the end of that fateful journey. Here on the Shuhada Day, while feeling a similar soul-jerking ambience all around, I asked myself what has gone wrong with us as a nation.
Looking into the mirror, we only see a mutilated and disjointed nation. We see a mass of hollow people with wooden faces leaning together as a paralysed body making gestures without motion and reflecting an image of what TS Eliot once described as “shape without form and shade without colour”. We find ourselves a hapless nation, debilitating itself physically as well as spiritually and a country looted and plundered by its own rulers, left with no dignity and independence. We are not even ashamed of what we are doing to ourselves. We have become a begging-bowl country. The world also calls us the ‘most dangerous nation’ on earth. Isn’t it time for us to change and behave like a nation?
Indeed, a nation, like an individual, is an organic entity which goes through different life-stages from birth and infancy to the identity crisis of adolescence, then evolving into a robust maturity and adulthood, and if not nourished and sustained through institutional strength with political, economic, social and moral steadiness, fading into decline and decadence. These stages are partly the result of government policies, priorities and patterns of governance, partly of the way leadership functions or malfunctions, and partly of the changing perceptions and preferences of the people. As a nation and as an independent state, where do we stand today?
With the Quaid-e-Azam’s early demise, Pakistan was orphaned in its very infancy and lost the promise of a healthy youth with acute systemic deficiencies and normative perversities restricting its orderly natural growth. After the Quaid, it was left without any sense of direction and in a state of political bankruptcy and moral aridity. It started cutting itself into pieces, losing within less than quarter of a century not only its own half but also its very rationale that had inspired its founding fathers to struggle for a separate homeland for the Muslims of the subcontinent. The real Pakistan disappeared with its tragic dismemberment, and whatever was left is the pillage ground for its self-serving rulers.
We are still not decided on some of the vital questions related to our statehood. Pakistan came into being in the name of Islam and democracy but it has lived without practising both. A country, which was considered a ‘20th century miracle’ of a state and which was fought and won entirely through democratic and constitutional struggle now itself struggles haplessly for genuine democracy and constitutional primacy. It is unsure of what its own original rationale was and what it stands for today. In the process, it is suffering an ideological ‘schizophrenia’, with a total disconnect between the vision that inspired its creation and its actual phonotypical behaviour.
To make things even worse, in recent years, the so-called liberal elite and our pseudo intellectuals have been wilfully distorting our history, misleading the youth that Pakistan’s birth was only ‘an accident of history’ and that the India-Pakistan border is no more than an artificial ‘thin’ line drawn on paper. They are naïve enough to believe that if we were to erase this ‘thin’ line, there would be no India-Pakistan problems and we would live happily thereafter at peace together as ‘one people’ with no need for any armed forces. They are sadly mistaken and need a tutorial in history to know that Pakistan is not an accident of history.
Those of us familiar with the history of the subcontinent know why having lived together for centuries, Hindus and Muslims remained poles apart in their attitudes to life with a different worldview altogether. This distinctiveness of the two communities was evident in the ‘encounter’ between Hindu and Muslim cultures that began over a thousand years ago. And yet, they remained distinct and far apart. Nobody can deny this reality; otherwise, there would not have been two states carved out of India in 1947.
Pakistan came into being as a result of a long struggle and with unquantifiable sacrifices. It is now a reality with its borders drawn in blood that cannot be erased, not even through any ‘goodwill’ gestures that some of our ruling elite and media friends are eager to make.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 10th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (48)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@SALEEM: Communal rioting, murder, rape and loot on both sides, do any of those shameful acts count as 'lot of sacrifices'?
Pakistan never was and never can be a nation in the true sense of the word. Nations have a common language and culture. Urdu is a foreign language imposed on pakistan by founding father. We might as well speak english. Religion alone does not make nation.
yes a lot of sacrifice in 1947 to create a nation. .......and then were run over by the Army in 1953, since then we have been under the boots. As Sh Rashid said yesterday the whole world is afraid of them
indians and pakistanis have serious differences as well as serious similarities!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@Salman ( Canada ): If 10% percent of Musalmans in the world are like you and self critical, not point fingers at others for the ills of Muslim Ummah and ask the basic question "what went wrong in the Islamic world", then others can do business with world of Islam.
Anyway, congratulation for your courageous thoughts and speaking.
Wa Salaam
@ Pak: So you are saying the expatriate Pakistanis working all over the world and sending precious foreign currency to Pakistan, which helps meet Pakistan's foreign exchange requirements, are people who " ate up your resources"? What resources did these young men and women eat up? If the country's image has gone down the chute, I can assure you it's not because of the Pakistanis living abroad. For us, it is becoming tougher to defend what is going on in Pakistan.
@John B:
And what in your view Sir is the reflection and the narrative of history which can stand the litmus test?
Rex Minor
@p r sharma:
In your analysis, you have completely ignored the period of colonisation. Muslims may not be regarded as the choosen people and their oil wealth simply a natural resource by a sheer coincidence and the employment opportunity they privide to hundreds of thousands of people from the Indian subcontinent besides others perhaps out of necessity for progress, but I can assure you sir that none of the muslim or christian majority countries are secular. Their constitutions are based on the values which one derives from the faith, thought their Governments apparatus have been secularised for good running of the administrations.
Mr Jinnah was fully aware of the religion of Islam, which was the first to bring out the principle of Egalitarianism.
Rex Minor
Its disgraceful to even challenge our basis ..... I agree with the author. Its imperative that we move on as a nation and progress as a nation....
The degenerative thinking has not served us well and will never do so!
@salman, ofcourse we should be worried about the expats' image. They deserve the countrys efforts right. The ones who ate away at our resources and moved to countries that had developed themselves. Then they sit on their high horses and comment on how pakistan isnt developed. You left your country, now leave its state of affairs alone as well.
@Safwan ... which she clearly states that Jinnah did not want Pakistan until the spring of 1947 and the Pakistan he got (half Bengal, half Punjab) was not the Pakistan he wanted....blah.. So what did jinnah want? the whole of punjab, inhabited by hindus, sikhs and hindus? the whole of bengal, inhabited equally by hindus and muslims? the of sindh, the original hindu civilization? the whole of kashmir, inhabited by hindu pandits, sikhs and muslims? Get real! Jinnah was nobody, he did not participate in the indian independence struggle like Maulana Azad, Gandhi, Nehru, Patel and many others. He was used by british to keep the statregic north-western part of india under british control, as brits knew that azad, ghandi,nehru, pater et. al. will not tow the US/british line.
@MSS: You may be, as an optimist, right. Pakistan is now simply sailing temporarily through troubled ayers. It will be fine. Remember Quaid's inspiring lecture on aug 1946 when he said, Hindus acre free to go to temples, Muslims to mosques, etc and the difference between them would disappear etc, etc,.... Just keep on praying for a New Messiah. It will be alright.
There are 47 Muslim majority countries and out of this 38 countries have muslim population ranging above 90% .mostly these countries are economically backward except those which are blessed with natural resources (oil). The countries which are secular like Malaysia( 60% muslims), Indonesia and turkey have been able to make high progress. Does it not a matter to think and analyze?
@Anjaan: Cannot speak about the liberals in Pakistan but certainly no liberal in India that I have met has any interest in reversing partition. They have an interesting in friendly relations between the two countries and a hope that the Indian subcontinent can mirror Europe in terms of freedom of movement and trade.
@a_writer: They didn't stay back believing in the future of India, but logistics was big deal for them. Also many of their family members left to Pakistan to settle there and call the rest with them. At least this was the case till 1971.
It seems , the former foreign secretary has scribed this piece either to canvass sympathy of the naive Pakistani for the military institution, or to announce where his loyalty lies, esp in the wake of recent events, in which renowned journalists were targeted for expressing critical/ sane views on the doings of spy agency and Taliban talks. Such developments exposed the institution's tendency to resort to violence, if the citizens crossed their limits, which they have drawn and have left the sane people in state of shock. As far as those officially arranged fake ceremonies within the secure cant areas are concerned ,Such programmes fail to incite the intended reaction from the majority. Rather they evoke a mass repulsion that when the country is slipping in total chaos, international isolation, where the intelligence agencies stoop to kill those who show them the mirror about their horrendous crimes against the dissidents, 'some people' find time to arrange such patriotic shows to air the crammed meaningless speeches. Former foreign secretary with an illustrious career in foreign ministry, by now must be an expert of lying for the those whose flawed narratives he was required to propagate throughout his career. His article is exclusively for the military men and for conservative naive people who read Pakistan studies from the books written by orthodox ulemas.
@ Tani: Re. your point about Pakistan rejoining with India being India's worst nightmare, I think no country in the world, including it's neighbours would want to invite trouble. We are close to the bottom on the Human Development Index; few countries around the world grant us access to their borders; we have a reputation as a hub of domestic and international terrorism; the country is riddled with ethnic and sectarian strife. The question which the author needs to ask himself is: is Pakistan a success story? Is there anything that we, the expatriate Pakistanis can be proud of?
Dear author: please tell us here what is it that makes you say,"Pakistan came into being as a result of a long struggle and with unquantifiable sacrifices..."?
Did another country try to wage war on Pakistan?
ET why did you not publish the comment what was abusive?
Wrong assumption to say Hindus and Muslims can't co exist together. How is that possible when in Hinduism we believe god is one but worshipped in different forms,faiths and practices? Mayb you don't know but Hindus do go to mosque and pray and even keep roza. Just because since centuries politicians have used religion for vote bank politics and power to spreading hatred by their loyal workers doesn't mean common people react same way. Having said that partition is very much reality even if Pakistan wishes to join back to india, india won't except it. Already with 14percent Muslims the politicians exploit the Hindu Muslim vote bank and follow divide and rule policy when their seat under threat from corruption scandal. Stagnating imp topics like corruption,growth, development shifting attention to religion. Imagine whole Pakistan rejoining india with its current turmoil state what havoc it will create in indian politics. Do you really think india or indians want or risk that? No nope never. It would be indians worst nightmare.
I disagree with your premise about our distinctiveness. The culture of India and Pakistan are quite similar, and a common strain runs across the religious divide. We share similarities in language, dress, food, music, etc. A different faith does not automatically imply differences in culture. How can it be different when the majority of Muslims are converts from Hindus and Sikhs? Millions in the Punjab continue to share last names with castes on the other side; a proof of their ethnic roots.. In fact the Founder's own grandfather converted from Hindu to Muslim. If living with your co-religionists was the ideal template for peaceful existence, than you may want to explain the killing of thousands of Muslims by fellow Muslims in Pakistan. If anything, religion has never been an instrument of cohesion and unity in Pakistan. The emergence of Bangladesh is evidence of that. Europe, despite a history of wars, formed a union. I think we too need to rise above religious bigotry and intolerance and learn to live in peace with our neighbours.
@mind control: ".....Apparently, some of us are taken in by ‘manufactured history’ of the subcontinent." . Not just some.
@Vikas: then be ready to be more happy in future.
@Kala Khan: TNT = Two Nation Theory
The author is under the mistaken notion that there is any interest in India in reversing the partition. Let me assur you - those who want such a thing is a very very small fringe indeed. No Ondian government has shown any such interest. If India was interested, it would have at least tried to partially reverse partition in 1971 but no such attempt was made. In fact as @Gratgy has accurately mentioned, there is an elecyrified fence built by India who does not want the border to be porous - let alone disappear.
With regards to the sacrifices for Pakistan - the violence and dislocation that followed AFTER the partition are described as that but that was an aftermath of partition. In any case an equal number of Hindus and Sikhs were killed: is it the author's case that these people too sqcrificed for Pakistan? No. In fact not one member of Muslim league went to jail during the freedom struggle for opposing the British for even a day even as Congress leaders like Gandhi, Nehru, Tilak, Patel spent years in jail. The notion that there were 'sacrifices' for creation of Pakistan is not supported by facts in the public domain.
In any case partition happened 67 years back and majortiyy of your population dissociated themselves from Pakistan because the premise that they would be safer in a country made specially for Muslims did not pan out for them. You have a country now- focus on making it the best you can without manufacturing history to justify the creation of Pakistan.
@John B: Welcome back.
@Vikas: You are only saying that because you are jealous of Shahrukh Khan ..
@BruteForce: what in the world is TNT.?..could you guys please not use these cool sounding acronyms ..
@BruteForce
Don't be too harsh. Subtlety works all the time you know. Cheers!
Forget India ("the Hindu land"), Pakistan has multiple Two-Nation Theories within itself. They cannot tolerate Hindus, Christians, Ahmadis, Shias/ Hazaras, etc.
Those of us familiar with the history of the subcontinent know why having lived together for centuries, Hindus and Muslims remained poles apart in their attitudes to life with a different worldview altogether. This distinctiveness of the two communities was evident in the ‘encounter’ between Hindu and Muslim cultures that began over a thousand years ago. And yet, they remained distinct and far apart. Nobody can deny this reality; otherwise, there would not have been two states carved out of India in 1947.
Well, will "those of us familiar with history of the subcontinent" please explain,
A. If Hindu/Muslim caused 1947, what caused 1971?
B. If 1947 was correct, how come as many Muslims are cohabiting with Hindus in India?
Apparently, some of us are taken in by 'manufactured history' of the subcontinent.
This is very clear from the article and comments above that "liberals and intellectuals can live harmoniously and peacefully without any borders while conservatives and religionists cannot do that". Thumps up for liberals. All multi cultural and multi national modern cities in the world are a proof of liberal thinking.
Shamshad Ahmed Sahib, your anguish is genuine and assessment of current affairs accurate. But Sir, wait a little longer. Things are not likely to improve in a hurry.
Pakistanis cannot live with themselves, how can they live with anyone else??
The border is not just a line on paper, its a huge fence that India has built to keep non state pakistanis out
@BruteForce: Well said! They won't understand it, but it was still well worth the saying.
Pakistan came as a result of sacrifice?
WHAT SACRIFICE?
Pakistan was born in blood in the streets of Calcutta. The blood of minority Hindus in a Muslim majority Province. The CM of the then Bengal is rewarded with PM post.
Jinnah who calls the universally revered Mahatma and Nehru names is elevated to the founder status. This is the same man who had called for violence in 1946.
Pakistan was born by repeating a lie that Hindus and Muslims cannot stay together. A divisive idea, whose basis for division is Religion. The same idea in different forms, where the basis for division is Sect, Language, Ethnicity is tearing Pakistan apart.
Perhaps, on second thought, TNT was indeed true. Possibly it is the Muslims who cannot live as a minority with any non-Muslim community, this time Hindus. We see examples of this in UK, US, China, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, etc.
"Let’s behave like a nation"
Excellent advice, indeed!
But, should we not first of all become a 'Nation'?
@ Johan B, Who learns from history anyway ... ? ... look at India ... the politicians simply forgot the horrors of the partition ... Muslim vote bank politics has gone to the extreme of becoming a security risk for India now ... the politicians are not shy of defending, even the illegal Bangladeshi migrants from being identified and sent back ... !!
@Vikas: That is a nasty and shameful thing to say. In fact, those who stayed back probably are better 'Indians' than the rest, because they believed in a future in India in spite of being a minority. Shame on you for being so narrow minded. They are as much or more an Indian compared to the likes of you!
With due respect to the author, I must say this: The article theme is genuine and is sincere but the supporting narration that Pakistan creation was a struggle for freedom and democracy is a rosy picture painted in a borrowed canvas for Pakistan readership and does not stand the litmus test of historical accuracy.
Unless we know where we have been, it is hard to see where we are going. Hence, accurate reflection and narration of history is essential for people to follow the plea of the article.
I'll leave the several misguided notions of this article to others to comment on.
An excellent article. Indeed. As the authors notes,..this a dismembered state,..er..country. If you can still call it a country by any definition. Rather it has descended into Dante's Inferno. You can decide which level you are on.
Happy that Pakistan was made, but very unhappy that lot of Muslims stayed behind.
The author is absolutely right ... only a section of the delusional pseudo intellectuals in the garb of liberal elites, both in India and Pakistan would lead others to believe that, the borders between Pakistan and India are artificial thin lines on paper ... !! ... there must be the acknowledgement of the reality that Pakistan and India are two dissimilar countries with serious differences ... to quote the author, "poles apart in their attitudes to life with a different worldview altogether" ...
Loved this article, the part about the "pseudo intellectuals" is very good,, i am a liberal myself and i agree with everything from gay rights to freedom of press but every freedom has limits otherwise it becomes meaningless...
When I read the very last paragraph, I said "Thank God" - no,no,no, not for Pakistan's sake, but for India's sake!
'This distinctiveness of the two communities was evident in the ‘encounter’ between Hindu and Muslim cultures that began over a thousand years ago. And yet, they remained distinct and far apart'.........true and the minorities that had opted to stay in Pakistan have shrunk and are of no consequence. Many of them wish to migrate if given the option.However it is not so in India.A large chunk of the minority opted to stay back and are the cause of problems in India and they should have joined the Islamic nation.
Thank you for this article.
Please make sure you translate into urdu and get it into the urdu press also
Pakistan Zindabad
I do not agree with the author, history and facts themselves do not agree with the author. I would advise him to read Ayesha Jalal's The Sole Spokesmen, which she clearly states that Jinnah did not want Pakistan until the spring of 1947 and the Pakistan he got (half Bengal, half Punjab) was not the Pakistan he wanted. The creation of the state of Pakistan was something quite avoidable. Had the Congress agreed to the Cabinet Mission plan (something which they initially did), Partition would had never occurred, unfortunately, Nehru saab was a socialist and he could had never agreed to a truly federal India. The author, is right when he talks about the distinctiveness of the Hindus and Muslims, that's is why as Pakistani I believe in the Two Nation Theory, but does not meant that the two nations could not live together in the same federal India, as they have done for centuries, just like Punjab/Punjabis and Bengal/Bengalis can be considered two different nations living in the same federal state. The concept of India itself is/was more like Europe, a collection of different nations (Punjab, Sindh, Bengal etc from an ethnic and cultural point of view) Muslims and Hindus from a religious point of view. I am sorry for author, for the sacrifices his family made during Partition, just like millions of other families including mine, made on both sides of the border. Now, Pakistan is a reality, what we do need are peaceful relations with our neighbor Hindustan and make this peace of land and its people progress and develop.