A welcome rapprochement

Israel’s decision to withdraw from peace talks certainly shows the side which is least interested in achieving peace.


Editorial May 04, 2014
Only by coming to terms with the political realities will Hamas be able to help in achieving the long-standing dream of a Palestinian homeland. PHOTO: AFP/FILE

What should have been welcomed has been unduly condemned. The recent rapprochement between Fatah and Hamas, which is not the first, nonetheless, should have been seen as a show of seriousness on the part of the Palestinians. They broke ties after Hamas swept the 2006 elections and seized control of the Gaza Strip in 2007. Though the reaction from the US has not been as strong as that from Israel, US Secretary of State John Kerry termed the Fatah-Hamas unity disappointing. As Kerry has pointed out that this may complicate the ongoing negotiations; however, we must not forget that Hamas must be considered an equal partner in this peace process since it has considerable influence over a section of the Palestinians.

On hearing the decision between Hamas and Fatah to form a unity government in the third week of April, the Israelis were quick to issue a condemnation and cancelled a negotiation session due to take place that same evening.

Perhaps, the critics of this newfound unity between Fatah and Hamas forget that such steps might help in mainstreaming Hamas more and compel it to change its hardened historical stance. Only by coming to terms with the political realities will Hamas be able to help in achieving the long-standing dream of a Palestinian homeland. History is evident that extreme political solutions have only left Hamas more isolated and Gazans cut off entirely from the international community. The Gaza Strip is the most densely-populated piece of land on the planet with its residents not even able to enjoy the barest essentials of human existence. In addition, the threat of raining Israeli bombs and excursions always looms.

Considering that Palestinian unity is the first real step towards the realisation of a Palestinian state, Israel’s decision to withdraw from the peace talks certainly shows the side which is least interested in achieving Middle East peace.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 5th, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (3)

Ali Tanoli | 10 years ago | Reply

Israel or its supporter west never intrested in peace any way so whats the point of withdrawing from talk and i think forming joint govt is a good step and will solve some problems of Gaza and other occupied terrotries.

Mirza | 10 years ago | Reply

Hamas has actually been formed by Israel and its support. This was to thwart the leadership of Fatah which according to Israel was a terrorist organization. One only negotiates with their enemies not friends. Nelson Mandela was branded a terrorist and put in jail for quarter of a century. Slavery, occupation, lack of hope and lack of respect and lack of basic civil rights breed terrorism and extremism. The argument "occupied are not ready for negotiation" is baseless. What negotiations when the occupier has all the powers and the other side none. Palestinians have never demanded an Islamic state, it was the Israel which started Hamas and to divert attention toward an Islamic state. It is a struggle for freedom nothing more or nothing less.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ