The concept of jihad in Islam is that of taking humans out of slavery and getting them to worship God. If we study the conditions set for jihad by the Shariah, we will realise that jihad is about helping the oppressed against the oppressor as opposed to violating someone’s rights or committing atrocities. On numerous occasions, the Holy Quran and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) have stressed the need for focusing on the commonalities. The Holy Quran contains clear instructions that “your religion is for you and our religion is for us”, which proves that followers of different religions can coexist in the same society.
Unfortunately, extremist behaviour seems to be on the rise in Pakistan. One reason for this is that religion has been taken hostage by those lacking religious and worldly education in societies where the rule of law does not exist. If we look at the recent past, we will realise that the practice of promoting one’s personal views and opinions in the name of religion is a major cause of sectarian violence and intolerance between religions. The Pakistan Ulema Council [PUC] has been carrying out a tireless campaign against intolerant behaviour, the purpose of which is to use dialogue as a means to raise awareness among people belonging to different religions and sects that they are not serving their religion or sect by debasing the holy figures or books of others. Instead, this kind of attitude further promotes extremism and fundamentalism, thus transforming the atmosphere of dialogue into confrontation.
Considering the significance of dialogue, the PUC’s central leadership compiled agreements signed between people belonging to different sects and religions and gave them the form of a formal code of conduct. This code of conduct combines all clauses that were unanimously approved by Pakistan’s central religious leadership at the Milli Yakjehti Council. By the grace of Allah, the religious affairs department of Punjab is currently striving to formally implement this code of conduct and the author has presented it in the Council of Islamic Ideology as a stepping stone towards it being made into legislation.
During the last couple of months, religious and sectarian tensions have once again been sparked in Karachi and different areas of interior Sindh. Considering the casualties and financial losses incurred by innocent people, the PUC held an Ulema and Mashaikh Peace Convention and National Peace Conference in Karachi on April 16. In this conference, representatives of all religions, sects and the country’s major political and religious parties unanimously condemned these incidents and decided to form a national reconciliation council that would try to immediately resolve future problems and also review problems that occurred in the past.
As has been the case in the past, the PUC is once again striving to pave the way for interfaith and inter-sectarian harmony and dialogue. We expect the government and the country’s dominant forces to play a role in implementing the code-of-conduct. We expect this because during a meeting with the PUC’s leadership a few weeks ago, the prime minister had assured his full cooperation for interfaith and inter-sectarian harmony. The only way to promote religious forbearance and an attitude of tolerance in Pakistan is by making sure that everyone is on the same page of national unity and nobody is discriminated against because of their religion, sect, race, language or province.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 25th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (25)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Rex Minor: Dead people! If we do not understand the hardship,sacrifices and struggle of our elders then we will be a people without a past.A tree without roots that has no chance of survival. The believers consisting of 72 sects(approx.) have decoded the Quranic suras since the last 1500 years. The galaxy of luminaries produced by Islamic societies is proof enough. Surely the values of liberty,fraternity and equality are essential principles of Islam. The Military is not trained to kill,especially in the context of Pakistan's standoff with India.It is there to defend the nation and extricate the state and people of J&K (Muslims & non-Muslims) occupied by a 7 lakh army. Sectarian and separatist violence unleashed by clerics and politicians cannot be ignored by the army.We have politicians similar to Sk. Abdullah and LeJ scholars inciting hatred.
@Irshad Ahmed Vohra: sa
You are quoting many dead peopler and talking about Islam becoming the vehicle of progress? The entire knowledge about the universe is imbedded in the scriptures. The task for the believer is to decode the Quraanic suras to be able to comprehend it which are written in the divine arabic language and for the science is to explain the mechanism of the Universe. The military is trained to kill, whereas the clergy is dedicated to serve the house of God where the believer seeks blessings. The country's constitution must be in harmony with the values of the religion of Islam, and this is possible if the political leadership work in conjuntion with the muslim scholars and the constutional experts of the world. The military has no part in this process. Education is the vehicle of progress and this unfortunately has not had necessary reforms. Most elite universities in the west including Oxford and Harvard were set up as Madrassas for religious lessons, other subjects including science were later added. Pakistan Madrassas could add natural science subject.
Rex Minor.
The Chairman is confusing the RELIGION with FAITH!!. There cannot be a harmony between different religions or faiths of individuals but its followers can coexist in peace through dialogue and tolerence. Pakistan constitution does not reflect the values of Islam and is nothing more than Fata Morgana. •
Expressing any opinion on the concept of a state that the Quaid had in mind is better substantiated by the different options considered prior to the acceptance of the 3rd June plan.Mountbatten broached the idea of united Bengal that joined neither Pakistan nor India:Jinnah replied empathically,"I should be delighted. What is the use of Bengal without Calcutta; they had much better remain united and independent." A 52% Muslim & 48%Hindu electorate was an equitable democratic setup that was endorsed by Jinnah but rejected by Gandhi and Nehru . A democratic setup that did not steamroller the rights of 25% Muslim minority in united India was rejected by the Congress.The option of a separate nation was accepted in the belief that since the Muslims believed "in one God.They believed in equality of men and in human brotherhood"(Jinnah to Cripps).The values of liberty. fraternity and equality would enable us to gel into a harmonious nation. Ayub Khan's comments are worth a glance.He said,"In the name of Islam they(mullahs) are dead against progress and society having the right to think for itself.Their religion and philosophy has not the slightest affinity with the true spirit of Islam." His apprehension that,"These people will not allow Islam to become a vehicle of progress.What will be the future of such an Islam in the age of reason and science is not difficult to predict." Hafiz Ashrafi and the Pakistan Ulema Council could start the interfaith harmony by stating that,"you are free to go to your temple to your mosque,it has nothing to do with the business of the state".
@gp65: adopting certain proifile is just an attempt to please west. Every country should adopt the laws as it suits them but the merit and equality and justice to all citizen and all are equal in front of laws should be the criteria to move ahead.Religion is not the hindrance for prosperity equality and development and equal right to all.
The Chairman is confusing the RELIGION with FAITH!!. There cannot be a harmony between different religions or faiths of individuals but its followers can coexist in peace through dialogue and tolerence. Pakistan constitution does not reflect the values of Islam and is nothing more than Fata Morgana.
Rex Minor
@parvez: All you have to do is open YouTube and look for this man's video regarding the blasphemy law in which he is threatening the late minister for minorities, Shabaz Bhatti. Please watch that and then comment again on Tahir Ashrafi's sanity.
@parvez: Either you are too old or you don't have proxy service to play with you-tube which unfaces many 'sane' faces.And that is the main reason behind the ban on youtube.
Tahir sahib is one of the saner elements in our religious line up. He is a better face of Islam than most of others. He has been preaching tolerance and I expect that he will go all the way in accepting people of all faiths, and I mean all faiths, as equal citizens of the country. That kind of equality will require a constitutional amendment but then that is another story.
@Jahangir Chauhan: China is not secular and does not allow people to practice their own religion - ask the Ulghurs if you have any doubt. Not sure where you got that from.
As far as development goes - becoming secular may not hurt or help but the unending sectarian violence and oppression of non-Muslim Pakistanis would surely stop. DOn't you think that is a good thing?
@Syed: will there be any better future guaranteed after adopting secular profile just to say like India or China.
Theres a huge body of variety of relegiuos organizations. I for one would like to see the sermons in mosques being regulated by the heads of each group, so that the people get to here the harmonious tones Instead of hatred and loth for others.
@Blunt: The title of articles is usually chosen by ET. Author has very little say in it.
Yes, but I think it is only in the blogs section. Many blogs have catchy titles that sometimes do not correspond with content.
On the other hand, look at the titles in the "Opinion" section and you will notice that every author has an individual style.
@3rdRockFromTheSun: The title of articles is usually chosen by ET. Author has very little say in it.
Some body please wake me up!
Beautiful words as usual by Ulema - but I ask on behalf of the vast majority of Pakistani Muslims - why are the 'Ulema' increasingly held in contempt by not just Pakistani Muslims - but Muslims across the world?
Simple question... And please don't say they are not good Muslims...
Three Words: What about ahmadis?
Dear Hafiz Sahib,
I saw your picture with Malik Ishaq and Ludhianvi and everyone had a big smile. These two guys are responsible for thousands of killings. What do you have to say about this? I have never heard you speak out against LeJ and ASWJ, both of these are banned organizations.
Nicely written and your attempt at explaining the situation, reads well. I must admit that I like hearing you speak on TV because I believe that you are genuine and learned in your views. What I fear is that people like you are in a minority not only within the clergy but also within the people. Correcting this imbalance is a difficult task but a necessary one, to be done by you along with others in the clergy and government who think like you.
PUC to lecture us on interfaith harmony.....slow clap...
The constitution of Pakistan categorically deprives minorities of their basic rights of freedom and right to vote and right to supreme posts such as head of state.It was only after ZIA introduced some fascist clauses in the name of religion that deadly organization like laskkar jhangvi came into existence.Why is it that whenever there is a debate to.undo discriminatory clauses same uleama counsel opposes it tooth and nail. This op-ed is full of flaws.
To have peace and interfaith harmony Pakistan must become a secular state just as Jinnah stated in his August 11, 1947 speech. We must follow the principle: For you, your religion, for me, my religion. Molvis must have no role in politics; otherwise Pakistan has no hope.
An article on 'Interfaith harmony' and not a single mention of any other faith except Islam!