Now, whilst I know I might be crossing a ‘red-line’ as imposed by an internet thug (as so aptly put by my friend also under threat); cross it I must. For this absolute beauty is so despicable that it militates against everything I learnt as a Gentleman Cadet at the Pakistan Military Academy and as an officer in our fine army. E.g., let alone being part of any political party, politics (and money and ladies) were NEVER even discussed by officers, and if a senior officer heard you do so you would be for the high jump, an army euphemism meaning that you would be marched before him by the Adjutant, and severely dealt with by the Commanding Officer (CO) the very next day.
A word on the COs (Commanding Officers of battalions and regiments of the rank of Lieutenant Colonel) of those days. Whilst one saw the CO when he visited the training area or the firing ranges now and then, young officers also met him in the unit tea-room for Elevenses at least twice a week. The CO was an ethereal being, his feet, in glistening shoes, barely touching the ground and golly, were we junior lot terrified of him. Even of the kind and soft-spoken Lt. Col. (later Lt. Gen.), Ahmad Jamal, a gentleman down to his toenails, his wife Begum Jamal an affectionate and motherly lady who and her husband would have the unmarried officers to their gracious home every so often so we wouldn’t miss our own.
Yet, a mere summons to the CO’s office outside of the regular CO’s conference when all officers attended, made one’s blood run cold. What have I done now, one would ask oneself! Even talking politics got you one of those visits accompanied by a ‘warning’ at the very least! If you repeated the crime you were up for a ‘reprimand’, and so on up the scale.
And what, pray, is this particular aberration nay crime, in a (good) soldier’s book that I talk about? The banner held by around seven people among a ‘crowd’ of about 17 Commando supporters who turned out in Karachi in his support on Sunday April 12. The banner shows the Commando on the right, his fist raised defiantly, and Chief of Army Staff General Raheel Sharif, uniform and all, on the left, his arm raised too as if in support of the Commando. I ask you. The Commando supporters obviously took it from newspaper photographs of the COAS visiting SSG troops at Tarbela at which he raised his arm to accompany the troops in the usual slogans.
The people who sponsored the banner are: Mohammad Ali Sherwani, Wasi-ud-Din Ahmad, Syed Qasim Rizvi and Misbah ud Din Sheikh. If I had anything to do with the government or the Army I should have the lot of them arrested and vigorously prosecuted for sedition for using the picture of the sitting COAS on a party-political banner in trying to prove the Commando had his support.
This is another absolutely pathetic and unsavoury and disgraceful attempt to once again try to conflate the Commando with the Pakistan Army and the COAS with him. Someone must act now, before the situation really gets out of hand. The army could even try these seditionists, for that is what they are, by Court Martial under the Army Act, as their action brings the COAS himself into disrepute. For his part the Commando ought to be ashamed of himself.
On another tack, nothing gladdens my heart more than news that political leaders of different political parties, different ideologies, have met in a most cordial atmosphere. The body language was telling, showing two men at perfect ease with each other. This is all the more a happy augury given the recent needless tensions whipped up by a clutch of ill-intentioned people who suddenly find themselves on the wrong side of popular politics, and who are doing all they can to sow confusion and despair while feverishly stirring their poisonous pot.
I refer to the meeting between the Prime Minister and the former President. Kindly note that, as I have said before, I am one of those who have lived through the acrimony of the late 1980s between the PML and the PPP, and also played my sordid part in that unhappy time for democracy. I am doubly blessed that I have seen in my lifetime one-time fierce opponents come together for the sake of democracy and to face down adventurers of all stripes and colours.
I am gratified too that as another thrilled Pakistani, I saw the COD being signed by the much-lamented Benazir and Nawaz Sharif, once more the PM now, Masha’allah. I also consider myself fortunate enough to have seen Nawaz Sharif’s eyes brim with tears when I asked him in an interview I did for Dawn News how he felt when he heard about Benazir’s horrific assassination. I knew then that our main political parties had arrived so to say, and that no outside force would ever now derail democracy.
Now let us hope that the other big party, the PTI and its ‘cabinet’ realise too that all politicians must stand together to face down the ever-present threats machinated by some of our TV ‘anchors’ and then eagerly pursued by the agents of strife and discord and that they too will help face down the extra-constitutional forces whose ugly shadow forever looms across this country.
It was disappointing then, to see that whilst her party boss has said that another Martial Law will bring the country to ruin, Andleeb Abbas, of the PTI’s Punjab ‘cabinet’ has tweeted:
Nawaz Sharif to meet his mentor Asif Zardari...Agenda?...tips on how to remain in Govt despite ruining the country!!!
— Andleeb Abbas (@AndleebAbbas) April 16, 2014
More Royal than the King, no?
Published in The Express Tribune, April 18th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (39)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Rex Minor: Dear Rex, You may be right, but your reasoning sounds like gobbledygook to me. Sorry.
@Sexton Blake:
There are two kinds of truths, those of reasoning and those of facts. Truths of reasoning are necessary and the opposite is impossible, truths of facts are contingent and the opposite is possible.When a truth is necessary, the reason can be found by analysis, resolving into more simple ideas and truths, until we come to those which are primary(Gottfried Leibniz)
Rex Minor
@Abid P. Khan: In the media / press business certain standards establish the credentials of a media house........I am least bothered about the NY Times ( as I don't read it ) but ET has over the years established a high standard and credibility. What I have observed and mentioned in a lighter tone before is that I notice that Mr. Kamran Shafi's articles seem to have more than one moderating team......and this truely seems absurd.
@Rex Minor: Dear Rex, By following your logic the readers are really between a rock and a hard place. I think you are saying that the media generally is not obliged to tell the populace what is happening. However, if people make their own decisions as to what may have happened in a particular situation they are then accused of being conspiracy theorists. It is my view, for better or worse, that there is no substitute for full truthful disclosure by the media. It is just as well to realize that in a democracy the people are supposedly in charge, and the politicians are their servants. Unfortunately, this has been lost sight of. Shadowy figures are in the background, and quite often the media is unaware of what is happening
Kamran Shafi derides Pervez Musharaff prematurely.The democratic dispensations with a manifesto to cling to power at all cost will undo Pakistan as usual.Democracy that endangers sovereignty is the dilemma that forces the hands of the army,despite the army discipline that restrains officers from being part of any political party or dabbling in politics.A dispassionate appraisal of the events in 1999; the hijacking of the plane will unearth the truth.It is obvious that Musharaff was not a solitary General acting on personal whims or fancies. Pakistan was and is passing through a phase confounds and confuses anyone.deciding any course of action is a risky job. At times the decision has to evaluate which course of action will be less damaging.The critics.the media with a craving for sensationalism portrays the minimum damage scenario as an act of treason. Musharaf acted with sagacity and patriotism and is naturally embarassed, being accused of treason.Taunting remarks by our politicians and journalist,mocking his courage as a commando and a General tarnishes the image of the army personnel.
@Sexton Blake:
It is all a matter of judgement sir, and will not serve anyones interest, if ET were to explain that they are being asked to ignore, delete and trash certain input by authorities who are invisible to the readers.
Rex Minor
@Rex Minor: I'm surprised that without seeing both of my comments that were ' shot down ' you chose to express your views........
@Parvez: "Its a shame that legitimate comments are being shot down……..the reputation that ET has as an open, forward looking, courageous site……..is fast eroding. " . Every publication has its own editorial policy. Why should we object to New York Times or it's Paki version's (ET) editors being selective in their choice of publishable material.
@a_writer: KS style is unique and hard hitting ...someone who exposes the the degeneration of the Armed Forces plus the corruption of the Politicians ...I am sure it was Mr Shafi who blew the whistle on the large scale transfer of antiques from Pakistan to Shaheed Mohterma Ms Bhutto's Mansion in the U.K. ...that is the sort of daring man he is ...
@Rex Minor: Dear Rex, You are correct to some extent. ET moderators usually let a missive through if Pakistan is being trashed, but are much more circumspect when a missive is critical of the US or Zion.
@Parvez: Madrassas are where people go for learning; ET moderators will trash what they view as inappropriate for the readers. My comments did not show up for one or other reason or got lost in transit. Please resubmit if you are proud of the input, but please do not lament or squawk if they get filtered away.
Rex Minor
It's about violation of service values, rules, traditions and above all, the abrogation of the supreme law of any country or state, the constitution on which state is made functional. Dis-plume, non compliance, suspension and ultimate abrogation to the constitution is the root cause of all problems including the deprivations of minorities, humble segments of society which has crossed multiple red lines. It's about the use of power protected with the sense of responsibility within jurisdictional domain and distribution of resources defined in the constitution. It is consistently violated. This is sharply polarizing the country and reaching to the core of the last citadel of security. Senior journalist has pulsed and reflected it and is commendably committed.
@M Afzal Jatt: Hahaha. So it WAS posted, no? THIS is freedom of expression!
The media is using this Musharraf trial and ploy to make the ppl forget about the real problems and just stay focused on petty issues. If there was a real charter for democracy, y local body elections not being held.
I agree with the author's point about the Mush camp using unsavoury tactics to influence the outcome. The rest is, oh well, five hundred words.
....and in the end PTI bashing as usual...though few lines of PTI bashing would have not given you the sense of satisfaction till your next piece...must tweeet anti PTI
Maj (Retd.) Shafi, While I do look forward to reading your weekly articles for their literary content but to be honest I am starting to get sick of your 'Commando Bashing'. Do you hold some personal grudge against the man from your days of the army? There is so much more to write about like the population explosion, the lack of fair and swift justice, illiteracy, lack of potable water, poor health care for the masses, miserable state of economy, power shortages and so on. So can you please stop writing about what to you seems the most important issue in Pakistan - Gen (Retd.) Musharraf, and give us some enlightened pieces on what effects the common man?
@Motiwala:
Strongly agreed, old wine in new bottle.
@sabi: @numbersnumbers: Nothing to do with truth. It is the same diatribe. Every week. Dressed in different clothes. Like a broken record. Again and again. Points of disagreements?? Read all the previous comments. Going back weeks.
Losing it.. slowly.
@M Afzal Jatt: Truth hurts isn't it? bear with it.
@M Afzal Jatt: Oh Please, another poster who throws rocks at the author's work BUT can't take the time to point out just where you disagree with the author's positions!!!
Mr.Shafi:
I have always enjoyed your writing style. However, 'watching' the dirty linen of Pakistan being washed week after week does get somewhat tiresome. This is from somebody who under best of circumstances is ambivalent about Pakistan ( you don't want to know about 'not so good' circumstances !)
How about taking a violent and sharp turn of the steering wheel and write something bright and nostalgic about Pakistan, about your country from years gone by, without the politics and treachery - something from your childhood memories? I bet you can do it !
Well written thank you.Shame on anti democratic forces they have no roots in masses. Credit must be given to pmln and ppp leadership for peaceful transaction.Chest thumping is the fate of ideologists.I enjoy it (chest thumping). Musharaff chapter is coming to close??.
Everything this author writes is so biased as to be laughable. The fact is that Musharraf didn't rule alone..he was assisted by innumerable civil and political leaders. Regardless, at the end of the day, Pakistan was much better with him at the helm than it ever was under PPP (the authors preferred party, obviously) and PML-N. Until that is not the case, he should remain free and treated as the hero he is.
What is generally known as COD, has manifested as CHARTER OF CORRUPTION WITH MUTUAL IMPUNITY and after 18th Amendment, Pakistan has virtually turned into a dynastic monarchy. As such, Nawaz-Zardari's meeting was more to do with securing their fortunes/dynasty for their kids, than democracy, which is nowhere to be seen in Pakistan. .
KS/Author,
How do you know Musharraf put these folks up to this banner? Blind hate leads you to write such frivolous charges. For god sake man, can you deny that there are countless people who oppose the victimization of Musharraf? On one end you cry about the deep state muzzling the supporters of democracy but your writings and infatuation with Musharraf and his supporters is no different. You too are all about muzzling up private citizens who have all the right to put the picture of the current Army Chief and a former Army chief on the same banner. How so would these people be subject to the PAA?
You are just as much of an "extremist" as any of the other kind you hate so much. Your extremism comes up when it has to do with covering the shortfalls of the PPP which you rabidly and blindly do and secondly when it comes to bashing Musharraf.