We could not agree more and have been saying from the very beginning of this administration’s tenure — and throughout most of the last one’s as well — that the government appears to have only mastered the art of commenting about the economy, rather than making the tough decisions necessary to shape its future. His predecessor was not a raving success, but Finance Minister Ishaq Dar appears bent on setting new records. His obsession with the wrong metrics such as the currency exchange rate, his refusal to acknowledge the tax problem and his insistence on privatisation as the solution to everything are just some of the reasons why an economy with as much potential as ours is languishing with low growth and high inflation.
But it is not just the minister’s fault. All of Islamabad appears to be concerned only with getting through one year. Hardly anyone in government gives any thought to the next year, let alone a decade or two down the road. This adhoc approach to policymaking is why we make supremely irrational decisions like cutting investments in infrastructure to spend more money on subsidies and to bail out grossly inefficient state-owned companies. Meanwhile, millions of children go without access to schools and millions more of our citizens have no access to even primary healthcare. We spend more on electricity subsidies than on education and health combined.
Perhaps we should not be surprised that nobody in government seems to understand the linkages between these numbers. With such a low investment in education, perhaps nobody taught them the math.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 3rd, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (6)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Hey, the 3.4% growth is paltry only if you want to take all of Pakistan's 180 million citizens along toward prosperity. It is not paltry if you consider that only 10% of the population matters. The top 20 million will get adequate growth, the bottom 160 million never mattered anyway - and never will. See? Look at the bright side.
With such a low investment in education, perhaps nobody taught them the math.
Talking about public, right? That's whom you should refer. Key to our problems.
Pretty much sums it all up: We spend more on electricity subsidies than on education and health combined.
Last paragraph, best.
Previous government is responsible for slow-economic-growth