Govt expresses 'inability' to remove Musharraf's name from exit control

Short, vaguely-worded communique from Interior Ministry to Musharraf passes buck back to judiciary


Azam Khan April 02, 2014
PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE

ISLAMABAD: In an ambiguously-worded communique, the Interior Ministry has informed General (retd) Pervez Musharraf that the government was "unable to accede to his requests" to remove his name from the Exist Control List (ECL) "on the basis of record pronouncements of the superior courts."

The communication read:
To: General Pervez Musharraf

Subject: Deletion of name from ECL.

I am directed by the competent authority to communicate with you with reference to your request on the subject cited above dated March 31, 2014. The requests have been considered on the basis of record pronouncements of the superior courts on the cited subject and pending criminal cases in various courts. The federal government is unable to accede to your requests in public interest.

Sources privy to the developments and meetings say, however, that the vaguely-worded communique has its reasons - mostly political. It has been suggested that Musharraf's legal team approach relevant courts in order to have the defendant's name removed from the ECL (which is why it was placed on the ECL to begin with).

Last year, the Sindh High Court had put Musharraf’s name on the Exit Control List (ECL), asking him not to leave the country without seeking prior permission from the concerned courts.

Musharraf's lawyer Dr Farogh Naseem had already said that he would move the Supreme Court if the government did not respond favourably.

After the special court read out charges to Musharraf on March 31, and said that it did not have jurisdiction over the ECL matter and it was for the government to decide, Naseem had filed an application with the Interior Ministry to allow Musharraf to travel abroad to seek medical treatment and see his ailing mother.

An Interior Ministry official said that after a high-level meeting and deliberations it was decided that it would be a better option that any decision on the matter should be taken in light of a judicial order. “This is a win-win situation for all,” he added.

“It is more of a political decision and has minimal legal hurdles,” the interior ministry official told The Express Tribune. The government is perhaps weighing its options and possible repercussions of the decision, he added.

A day after the special court indicted General (retd) Pervez Musharraf on treason charges, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif consulted senior members of his party on whether or not to allow the former military ruler to travel abroad to seek medical treatment and see his ailing mother.

Most participants of the meeting – including Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, Information Minister Pervaiz Rashid, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal and Senators Raja Zafarul Haq and Sardar Mehtab Abbasi – opposed the idea of giving concessions to Musharraf.

Meanwhile, a member of Musharraf’s legal defence team, Rana Ejaz, on Wednesday stated that it was with “secret diplomacy” that Musharraf appeared in court and that the government had deceived Musharraf, Express News reported. Musharraf’s spokesperson Rashid Qureshi denied having any knowledge of Ejaz’s statements.

COMMENTS (24)

Pakistani Patriot | 10 years ago | Reply

@Jehan Zeb: I said nothing about this case being illegal. Please read my comments carefully. What I stated is the gov't cannot hold Musharraf legally, meaning the court has already said there is no reason to have his name on the ECL. Yet Nawaz Sharif uses the court's excuse. The world knows it is a personal vendatta and nothing else. Why else is Musharraf singled out while the aiders and abettors who under Article 6 are equally liable of treason sit in the assemblies and are in the NS government as well? This gov't and its supporters are two-faced.

Aam Aadmi | 10 years ago | Reply

@M A Mujeeb: sheikh Rasheed is the most untrustworthy person in Pakistan. On many occasions he has backed out of his words. He is rightly being denied visas by different countries.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ