Seeking future stability
For the sake of Afghanistan, and also Pakistan, we must hope issues over BSA can be sorted out as quickly as possible.
US is planning to pull out its troops completely from Afghanistan unless the BSA is signed. PHOTO: AFP/FILE
Much of what happens in our region in the future depends on what happens in Afghanistan over the coming few years — and the lack of certainty on that front can only add to the wider uncertainty over what lies ahead. This point was brought home by US President Barack Obama on February 25, as he warned his Afghan counterpart President Hamid Karzai that currently, the US was planning a full troop pullout from the country this year, and had put the steps in place to make this a logistical possibility, given the failure on the part of the unpredictable President Karzai to sign a Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) that would allow a continued Nato troop presence for security and training purposes. President Obama has also made it clear that Washington remained ready to sign the BSA with President Karzai or another leader. The need for this agreement has been strongly voiced from within Afghanistan. A council of tribal elders had already approved it and the Afghan President’s unexpected refusal to put pen to paper has strained relations with the US, which since 2001 has, of course, played a key role in Afghanistan.
It is also quite obvious that the US troop presence is required if we are to avoid Afghanistan plunging into chaos. Militant forces and warlords vying for power remain formidably strong there and most observers are convinced that an ill-trained Afghan Army on its own would be able to do very little against them. For the sake of Afghanistan, its people, and also our own country, we must hope the issues over the BSA can be sorted out as quickly as possible. The nature of the current situation is such that Washington, Kabul and Islamabad need to act jointly to tackle it. Any rifts among these three centres of power can only do harm, stripping away the chances of gaining the calm and the stability that is so desperately needed if there is to be a return to anything resembling normalcy in this part of the world.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 27th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
US entered Afghanistan to eliminate Osama and Al Qaida. Presence in Afghanistan and access through Pakistan strategically helped US scare off Iran. Now Osama is killed. Iran has put aside her nuclear program. India has become a US ally. Obama is not going to fight another election. There is nothing left for the US to be interested in Afghanistan now. Its upto Afghanistan, how it copes up with the new reality. However, peace and stability in Afghanistan is more important to Afghan, Pak and India than anyone else.
Nice editorial - now take some time and explain how Pakistan's support of the Haqqani furthers stability in Afghanistan?
@sterry:
Mr Hamid Karzai does not and cannot enter into an agreementiont with the American adminstrration who are demanding immunity from Afghan laws, whereas he holds them responsible for committing crimes on Afghan soil during their 3500 night raids in Afghan people's houses.
Rex Minor
Karzai does not want to sign the BSA because he is trying to make sure his successor is chosen without scrutiny from the US or international community. The problem is that no group has any legitimacy in Kabul which is why Afghanistan is ranked among the bottom three of corrupt world nations with Somalia and North Korea. The best Pakistan can do is deport all of the Afghan refugees back to Afghanistan and seal the border with a fence and mines. Nothing can be done in Afghanistan because the groups there all hate each other and are not ready for reconciliation. Tajiks, Hazaras and Uzbeks will continue to be controlled by India and the Afghan Pashtuns there don't understand how they are being manipulated by the Farsiwan.