Kashmir, let this be pointed out, is in one respect more of a problem for India than it is for Pakistan. The world’s biggest democracy has miserably failed to resolve its dispute with what it claims to be its integral part without the use of brute force. And this continues to bleed the occupied territory. In pressing ahead with the unfinished Kashmir agenda, the prime minister should try to build on whatever progress was made during his predecessor’s time. General (retd) Pervez Musharraf couldn’t move forward as he didn’t have the required mandate, but Nawaz Sharif does have that requisite electoral backing and he should take advantage of that. We, at the same time, concede that India has some justified demands that should be addressed before the dialogue process can move forward meaningfully, such as pursuing the perpetrators of the Mumbai attack.
We should also be mindful of the fact that there will soon be a new government in India and, hopefully, that government will have the mandate to move forward on bilateral relations, too.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 7th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
It is nice of the Prime Minister to utter meaningful dialogue with India. However, Sharif's dialogue with militants over which he has complete control and jurisdiction are not going anywhere!!! Pakistan's celebration of Kashmir solidarity day, and not talking about PAK occupied Kashmir is not a starter. With positions on Kashmir so solidified, myths and misinformation prevail about Kashmir. It will require more than words on both sides to move forward on the issue.
"We should also be mindful of the fact that there will soon be a new government in India and, hopefully, that government will have the mandate to move forward on bilateral relations, too." couple of points here...foreign policy is not hostage to change of govt in a democratic nation. just had a chance to watch some Pakistani news channels spewing venom against the " enemy country" and one anchor almost pointed an accusing finger at India for the success of Indian-Americans. To say the least it was disgusting. I am sure news anchors and their guests are literate people. If they use such language, what would a main in the street be saying. We are stuck because we are neighbours and let us remain two neighbours who just don't see eye to eye on any issue. regards
Good editorial
We should also be mindful of the fact that there will soon be a new government in India and, hopefully, that government will have the mandate to move forward on bilateral relations, too.
I fully agree with you but the problem we are facing now is India become a Europe Union now Provincial chief ministers are powerful than our prime minister because of the coalition poltics we jokingly use to say oprime minister of bengal,tamil nadu,karnataka and chief minister of india. No body going to have strong political mandate to solve big problem like kashmir.
For example kejriwal generation poltician after meeting the pakisthani journalist he said to them where the pakisthan is in the world map. That much knowledge he possessing now.
We also blinking how to solve the big problem like kashmir.
I hope ET moderator publish my article. good luck
@Lolllipoopisthan: All major indian cities will be covered and protected by Ballistic Missile Defense system in the next 10 years.
If Kashmir is more of a problem for India than Pakistan as the Editorial suggests, then when did Pakistan become so altruistic that it cared about solving India's problems first? Doesn't Pakistan have enough problems of its own besides Kashmir?
Unconvincing editorial.
In order to 'SOLVE' Kashmir issue, the cards are with India and the hard work has to be done by Pakistan.
I read all articles about kashmiri solidarity day, but not even one article says about plan and future of people of other religions living in J & K. The people who have been displaced, ie the kashmiri hindus.
Is this solidarity only for kashmiri muslims??
Great Editorial -sensible and worth pursuing.
We dont want to talk to Pakistan, whats all this hoopla about talking to India? its all just hot air, which makes noo sense at all.We would like to build a wall from Gujarat to Kashmir and seal the border with Pakistan, permanently and for good, by consolidating Bharatiyah territory, in a not soo distant future, one can eveb think of Bangladesh integrating into India, atleast as a satellite state, along with other Eastern states, which dont want to be drubbed by China.One should give Christians, Hindus and Sikhs from Pakistan a chance to migrate into India - one last chance and then the borders should and will be sealed forever .Opened only for controlled, restricted trade.No one will bother Pakistan.Pakistan will do good by increasing trade relations with sister countries like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan ,Oman, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Iran, Tajiskistan and the likes. And thus it too can prosper.India has chosen to culturally link up more with the East, like Japan, Myanmmar, Thailand, Korea and China-with which Indians share a lot in common culturally/since India is spot in the center it can relate to almost all races and tribes and in most likely cases, would have been the cradle of all these peoples - so, west front is sealed,I think for the next 300 years, East front will be opened. I think this is the best way forward and this is what the GOI is doing by building a wall in LOC and opening up trade to the East via Kaladan Multi Modal Transport.As for Kashmir, we can go on fighting wars, which Pakistan will keep on loosing.Given this scenario, why choose war at all?.Pakistan should be ok with Pakistani occupied Kashmir and India with Jammu Kashmir.